From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"ohering@suse.com" <ohering@suse.com>,
"jbottomley@parallels.com" <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"hare@suse.de" <hare@suse.de>,
"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Force discovery of LUNs that may have been removed.
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:11:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140829011129.GA22458@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c5da85b38a2a4b26b9a7a7fadc40bcc2@BY2PR0301MB0711.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:54:51PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > This looks pretty reasonable to me, but I wonder if we should move this up
> > to common code so that it happens for any host rescan triggered by sysfs or
> > other drivers as well.
> Ping. Any decision on if/when this patch may be checked in.
I'll need a review or two for it still..
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"hare@suse.de" <hare@suse.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
"ohering@suse.com" <ohering@suse.com>,
"jbottomley@parallels.com" <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Force discovery of LUNs that may have been removed.
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:11:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140829011129.GA22458@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c5da85b38a2a4b26b9a7a7fadc40bcc2@BY2PR0301MB0711.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:54:51PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > This looks pretty reasonable to me, but I wonder if we should move this up
> > to common code so that it happens for any host rescan triggered by sysfs or
> > other drivers as well.
> Ping. Any decision on if/when this patch may be checked in.
I'll need a review or two for it still..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-29 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-17 3:09 [PATCH 0/2] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Fix issues with hot-add/remove of LUNs K. Y. Srinivasan
2014-08-17 3:09 ` K. Y. Srinivasan
2014-08-17 3:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: In responce to a scan event, scan the host K. Y. Srinivasan
2014-08-17 3:09 ` K. Y. Srinivasan
2014-08-17 3:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Force discovery of LUNs that may have been removed K. Y. Srinivasan
2014-08-17 3:09 ` K. Y. Srinivasan
2014-08-19 17:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-19 17:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-26 22:54 ` KY Srinivasan
2014-08-26 22:54 ` KY Srinivasan
2014-08-29 1:11 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-08-29 1:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-27 14:31 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-08-27 14:31 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-08-29 2:42 ` Mike Christie
2014-08-29 6:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-08-29 6:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-08-29 7:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-08-29 8:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-08-29 8:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-08-29 13:53 ` James Bottomley
2014-08-29 13:53 ` James Bottomley
2014-08-29 15:01 ` Ewan Milne
2014-08-29 15:01 ` Ewan Milne
2014-09-25 13:47 ` [PATCH 0/2] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Fix issues with hot-add/remove of LUNs Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-29 1:47 ` KY Srinivasan
2014-09-29 1:47 ` KY Srinivasan
2014-10-07 17:44 ` KY Srinivasan
2014-10-07 17:44 ` KY Srinivasan
2014-10-17 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-17 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140829011129.GA22458@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ohering@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.