All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Andrew Morton' <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	'Rik van Riel' <riel@redhat.com>,
	'Johannes Weiner' <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	rientjes@google.com, 'Weijie Yang' <weijie.yang.kh@gmail.com>,
	'linux-kernel' <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	'Linux-MM' <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: avoid wakeup kswapd on the unintended node
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:12:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140829081211.GF12424@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001cfc357$74db64a0$5e922de0$%yang@samsung.com>

On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 03:03:19PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
> When enter page_alloc slowpath, we wakeup kswapd on every pgdat
> according to the zonelist and high_zoneidx. However, this doesn't
> take nodemask into account, and could prematurely wakeup kswapd on
> some unintended nodes.
> 
> This patch uses for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask() instead of
> for_each_zone_zonelist() in wake_all_kswapds() to avoid the above situation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>

Just out of curiousity, did you measure a problem due to this or is
the patch due to code inspection? It was known that we examined useless
nodes but assumed to not be a problem because the watermark check should
prevent spurious wakeups.  However, we do a cpuset check and this patch
is consistent with that so regardless of why you wrote the patch

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>
Cc: "'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"'Rik van Riel'" <riel@redhat.com>,
	"'Johannes Weiner'" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	rientjes@google.com, "'Weijie Yang'" <weijie.yang.kh@gmail.com>,
	"'linux-kernel'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'Linux-MM'" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: avoid wakeup kswapd on the unintended node
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:12:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140829081211.GF12424@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001cfc357$74db64a0$5e922de0$%yang@samsung.com>

On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 03:03:19PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
> When enter page_alloc slowpath, we wakeup kswapd on every pgdat
> according to the zonelist and high_zoneidx. However, this doesn't
> take nodemask into account, and could prematurely wakeup kswapd on
> some unintended nodes.
> 
> This patch uses for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask() instead of
> for_each_zone_zonelist() in wake_all_kswapds() to avoid the above situation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>

Just out of curiousity, did you measure a problem due to this or is
the patch due to code inspection? It was known that we examined useless
nodes but assumed to not be a problem because the watermark check should
prevent spurious wakeups.  However, we do a cpuset check and this patch
is consistent with that so regardless of why you wrote the patch

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-29  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-29  7:03 [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: avoid wakeup kswapd on the unintended node Weijie Yang
2014-08-29  7:03 ` Weijie Yang
2014-08-29  8:12 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2014-08-29  8:12   ` Mel Gorman
2014-08-29  9:12   ` Weijie Yang
2014-08-29  9:12     ` Weijie Yang
2014-08-29 13:09 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-08-29 13:09   ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140829081211.GF12424@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=weijie.yang.kh@gmail.com \
    --cc=weijie.yang@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.