All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] jbd2: fold __wait_cp_io into jbd2_log_do_checkpoint()
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:30:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140902163033.GC19412@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409624051-6902-2-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>

On Mon 01-09-14 22:14:11, Ted Tso wrote:
> __wait_cp_io() is only called by jbd2_log_do_checkpoint().  Fold it in
> to make it a bit easier to understand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
  Hum, is this really such a win? Unlike __process_buffer(), this function
is well separated so IMHO the code is better readable before the folding.

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
> index 993a187..22fcd50 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
> @@ -183,58 +183,6 @@ void __jbd2_log_wait_for_space(journal_t *journal)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * Clean up transaction's list of buffers submitted for io.
> - * We wait for any pending IO to complete and remove any clean
> - * buffers. Note that we take the buffers in the opposite ordering
> - * from the one in which they were submitted for IO.
> - *
> - * Return 0 on success, and return <0 if some buffers have failed
> - * to be written out.
> - *
> - * Called with j_list_lock held.
> - */
> -static int __wait_cp_io(journal_t *journal, transaction_t *transaction)
> -{
> -	struct journal_head *jh;
> -	struct buffer_head *bh;
> -	tid_t this_tid;
> -	int released = 0;
> -	int ret = 0;
> -
> -	this_tid = transaction->t_tid;
> -restart:
> -	/* Did somebody clean up the transaction in the meanwhile? */
> -	if (journal->j_checkpoint_transactions != transaction ||
> -			transaction->t_tid != this_tid)
> -		return ret;
> -	while (!released && transaction->t_checkpoint_io_list) {
> -		jh = transaction->t_checkpoint_io_list;
> -		bh = jh2bh(jh);
> -		get_bh(bh);
> -		if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
> -			spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
> -			wait_on_buffer(bh);
> -			/* the journal_head may have gone by now */
> -			BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "brelse");
> -			__brelse(bh);
> -			spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
> -			goto restart;
> -		}
> -		if (unlikely(buffer_write_io_error(bh)))
> -			ret = -EIO;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * Now in whatever state the buffer currently is, we know that
> -		 * it has been written out and so we can drop it from the list
> -		 */
> -		released = __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh);
> -		__brelse(bh);
> -	}
> -
> -	return ret;
> -}
> -
>  static void
>  __flush_batch(journal_t *journal, int *batch_count)
>  {
> @@ -268,7 +216,7 @@ int jbd2_log_do_checkpoint(journal_t *journal)
>  	struct buffer_head	*bh;
>  	transaction_t		*transaction;
>  	tid_t			this_tid;
> -	int			err, result, batch_count = 0;
> +	int			result, batch_count = 0, done = 0;
>  
>  	jbd_debug(1, "Start checkpoint\n");
>  
> @@ -384,9 +332,36 @@ restart:
>  	 * Now we issued all of the transaction's buffers, let's deal
>  	 * with the buffers that are out for I/O.
>  	 */
> -	err = __wait_cp_io(journal, transaction);
> -	if (!result)
> -		result = err;
> +restart2:
> +	/* Did somebody clean up the transaction in the meanwhile? */
> +	if (journal->j_checkpoint_transactions != transaction ||
> +	    transaction->t_tid != this_tid)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	while (!done && transaction->t_checkpoint_io_list) {
> +		jh = transaction->t_checkpoint_io_list;
> +		bh = jh2bh(jh);
> +		get_bh(bh);
> +		if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
> +			spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
> +			wait_on_buffer(bh);
> +			/* the journal_head may have gone by now */
> +			BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "brelse");
> +			__brelse(bh);
> +			spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
> +			goto restart2;
> +		}
> +		if (unlikely(buffer_write_io_error(bh)) && !result)
> +			result = -EIO;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Now in whatever state the buffer currently is, we
> +		 * know that it has been written out and so we can
> +		 * drop it from the list
> +		 */
> +		done = __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh);
> +		__brelse(bh);
> +	}
>  out:
>  	spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
>  	if (result < 0)
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-02 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-02  2:14 [PATCH 1/2] jbd2: fold __process_buffer() into jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() Theodore Ts'o
2014-09-02  2:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] jbd2: fold __wait_cp_io " Theodore Ts'o
2014-09-02 16:30   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2014-09-02 17:00     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-09-02 16:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] jbd2: fold __process_buffer() " Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140902163033.GC19412@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.