From: rric@kernel.org (Robert Richter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64, defconfig: Increase NR_CPUS default to 64
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 15:28:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140908132843.GY4703@rric.localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3450151.nDuN2aF2Xl@wuerfel>
On 08.09.14 15:00:47, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 08 September 2014 13:44:48 Robert Richter wrote:
> > From: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
> >
> > Raising the current maximum limit to 64. This is needed for Cavium's
> > Thunder systems that will have at least 48 cores per die.
> >
> > The change keeps the current memory footprint in cpu mask structures.
> > It does not break existing code. Setting the maximum to 64 cpus still
> > boots systems with less cpus.
> >
> > Mark's Juno happily booted with a NR_CPUS=64 kernel.
> >
> > Tested on our Thunder system with 48 cores. We could see interrupts to
> > all cores.
> >
> > Cc: Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <rchintakuntla@cavium.com>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
> >
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> FWIW, have you tried what happens when you increase the number further?
> We have architectures on which we support thousands of CPUs, so I wonder
> if there is a point at which this stops working on ARM64.
>
> Are you able to compile and boot a kernel built with e.g. NR_CPUS=256 or
> 4096 on your hardware?
We haven't tried this so far, but it's definitely on our list testing
this.
-Robert
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <rchintakuntla@cavium.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64, defconfig: Increase NR_CPUS default to 64
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 15:28:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140908132843.GY4703@rric.localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3450151.nDuN2aF2Xl@wuerfel>
On 08.09.14 15:00:47, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 08 September 2014 13:44:48 Robert Richter wrote:
> > From: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
> >
> > Raising the current maximum limit to 64. This is needed for Cavium's
> > Thunder systems that will have at least 48 cores per die.
> >
> > The change keeps the current memory footprint in cpu mask structures.
> > It does not break existing code. Setting the maximum to 64 cpus still
> > boots systems with less cpus.
> >
> > Mark's Juno happily booted with a NR_CPUS=64 kernel.
> >
> > Tested on our Thunder system with 48 cores. We could see interrupts to
> > all cores.
> >
> > Cc: Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <rchintakuntla@cavium.com>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>
> >
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> FWIW, have you tried what happens when you increase the number further?
> We have architectures on which we support thousands of CPUs, so I wonder
> if there is a point at which this stops working on ARM64.
>
> Are you able to compile and boot a kernel built with e.g. NR_CPUS=256 or
> 4096 on your hardware?
We haven't tried this so far, but it's definitely on our list testing
this.
-Robert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-08 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-08 11:44 [PATCH] arm64, defconfig: Increase NR_CPUS default to 64 Robert Richter
2014-09-08 11:44 ` Robert Richter
2014-09-08 13:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-08 13:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-08 13:28 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2014-09-08 13:28 ` Robert Richter
2014-09-08 18:21 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-08 18:21 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-09 8:07 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-09-09 8:07 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-09-09 9:28 ` Paul Bolle
2014-09-09 9:28 ` Paul Bolle
2014-09-23 10:44 ` Robert Richter
2014-09-23 10:44 ` Robert Richter
2014-09-23 10:46 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-23 10:46 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-23 10:51 ` Robert Richter
2014-09-23 10:51 ` Robert Richter
2014-09-23 10:47 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-23 10:47 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140908132843.GY4703@rric.localhost \
--to=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.