From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Put each per-cpu kdump ELF notes into a single page
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:52:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140912115230.GA29945@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140912001537.5f877fe7@hananiah.suse.cz>
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:15:37AM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:16:37 -0400
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:43:30PM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:01:10 -0400
> > > Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:33:14PM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > > > > On architectures that use percpu-vm, the percpu region is not guaranteed
> > > > > to be contiguous in physical space.
> > > >
> > > > Petr,
> > > >
> > > > Which are those arches?
> > >
> > > All except nommu. Actually, percpu-km will be used instead even on MMU
> > > if SMP is disabled, but since SMP is pretty standard now, I guess the
> > > vast majority of all kernels out there is affected. ;-)
> >
> > Hi Petr,
> >
> > To make sure I understand it correctly I will just summarize what you
> > said.
> >
> > alloc_percpu() code does not guarantee that an object will be on physically
> > contiguous pages if object crosses page boundary. That's why we are forcing
> > allocation of object aligned to nearest higher power of two boundary of
> > object size and that way object will always be on same page (as long as object
> > is not bigger than a page).
> >
> > Is that a fair summary?
>
> Yes. I might add a note why physically contiguous memory is needed
> here, but maybe it's obvious to anyone dealing with kdump.
I think adding couple of lines to explain why physically contiguous notes
are needed is a good idea. It will not be ovious to anybody new to kdump.
Thanks
Vivek
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Put each per-cpu kdump ELF notes into a single page
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:52:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140912115230.GA29945@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140912001537.5f877fe7@hananiah.suse.cz>
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:15:37AM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:16:37 -0400
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:43:30PM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:01:10 -0400
> > > Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:33:14PM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > > > > On architectures that use percpu-vm, the percpu region is not guaranteed
> > > > > to be contiguous in physical space.
> > > >
> > > > Petr,
> > > >
> > > > Which are those arches?
> > >
> > > All except nommu. Actually, percpu-km will be used instead even on MMU
> > > if SMP is disabled, but since SMP is pretty standard now, I guess the
> > > vast majority of all kernels out there is affected. ;-)
> >
> > Hi Petr,
> >
> > To make sure I understand it correctly I will just summarize what you
> > said.
> >
> > alloc_percpu() code does not guarantee that an object will be on physically
> > contiguous pages if object crosses page boundary. That's why we are forcing
> > allocation of object aligned to nearest higher power of two boundary of
> > object size and that way object will always be on same page (as long as object
> > is not bigger than a page).
> >
> > Is that a fair summary?
>
> Yes. I might add a note why physically contiguous memory is needed
> here, but maybe it's obvious to anyone dealing with kdump.
I think adding couple of lines to explain why physically contiguous notes
are needed is a good idea. It will not be ovious to anybody new to kdump.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-12 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-05 16:33 [PATCH] Put each per-cpu kdump ELF notes into a single page Petr Tesarik
2014-09-05 16:33 ` Petr Tesarik
2014-09-11 19:37 ` Petr Tesarik
2014-09-11 19:37 ` Petr Tesarik
2014-09-11 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-09-11 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-09-11 20:43 ` Petr Tesarik
2014-09-11 20:43 ` Petr Tesarik
2014-09-11 21:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-09-11 21:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-09-11 22:15 ` Petr Tesarik
2014-09-11 22:15 ` Petr Tesarik
2014-09-12 11:52 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2014-09-12 11:52 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140912115230.GA29945@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.