* [PATCH v2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: discard unavailable timers correctly
@ 2014-09-17 19:39 ` Sudeep Holla
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2014-09-17 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: Daniel Lezcano, Thomas Gleixner, Sudeep Holla, Stephen Boyd,
Mark Rutland
Currently we wait until both cp15 and mem timers are probed if we
have both timer device nodes present in the device tree without
checking if the device is actually available. If one of the timer
device node present is disabled, the system locks up on the boot
as no timer gets registered.
This patch adds the check for the availablity of the timer device
so that we unavailable timers are discarded correctly. It also adds
the missing of_node_put.
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Changes v1->v2:
- Added missing of_node_put in the original code
- Updated the commit log as suggested
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index 5163ec13429d..7e267e3990ab 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -616,17 +616,29 @@ static const struct of_device_id arch_timer_mem_of_match[] __initconst = {
{},
};
+static bool __init
+arch_timer_probed(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
+{
+ struct device_node *dn;
+ bool probed = false;
+
+ dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches);
+ if (dn && of_device_is_available(dn) && (arch_timers_present & type))
+ probed = true;
+ of_node_put(dn);
+
+ return probed;
+}
+
static void __init arch_timer_common_init(void)
{
unsigned mask = ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER;
/* Wait until both nodes are probed if we have two timers */
if ((arch_timers_present & mask) != mask) {
- if (of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_mem_of_match) &&
- !(arch_timers_present & ARCH_MEM_TIMER))
+ if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_MEM_TIMER, arch_timer_mem_of_match))
return;
- if (of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_of_match) &&
- !(arch_timers_present & ARCH_CP15_TIMER))
+ if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_CP15_TIMER, arch_timer_of_match))
return;
}
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: discard unavailable timers correctly
2014-09-17 19:39 ` Sudeep Holla
@ 2014-09-17 19:51 ` Stephen Boyd
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2014-09-17 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 09/17, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Currently we wait until both cp15 and mem timers are probed if we
> have both timer device nodes present in the device tree without
> checking if the device is actually available. If one of the timer
> device node present is disabled, the system locks up on the boot
> as no timer gets registered.
>
> This patch adds the check for the availablity of the timer device
> so that we unavailable timers are discarded correctly. It also adds
s/we//
> the missing of_node_put.
>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: discard unavailable timers correctly
@ 2014-09-17 19:51 ` Stephen Boyd
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2014-09-17 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sudeep Holla
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, Mark Rutland, Thomas Gleixner,
Daniel Lezcano
On 09/17, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Currently we wait until both cp15 and mem timers are probed if we
> have both timer device nodes present in the device tree without
> checking if the device is actually available. If one of the timer
> device node present is disabled, the system locks up on the boot
> as no timer gets registered.
>
> This patch adds the check for the availablity of the timer device
> so that we unavailable timers are discarded correctly. It also adds
s/we//
> the missing of_node_put.
>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: discard unavailable timers correctly
2014-09-17 19:39 ` Sudeep Holla
@ 2014-09-24 15:16 ` Sudeep Holla
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2014-09-24 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Mark,
On 17/09/14 20:39, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Currently we wait until both cp15 and mem timers are probed if we
> have both timer device nodes present in the device tree without
> checking if the device is actually available. If one of the timer
> device node present is disabled, the system locks up on the boot
> as no timer gets registered.
>
> This patch adds the check for the availablity of the timer device
> so that we unavailable timers are discarded correctly. It also adds
> the missing of_node_put.
>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
If your are fine with this, can I ask Daniel you pick this up ?
Regards,
Sudeep
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Changes v1->v2:
> - Added missing of_node_put in the original code
> - Updated the commit log as suggested
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index 5163ec13429d..7e267e3990ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -616,17 +616,29 @@ static const struct of_device_id arch_timer_mem_of_match[] __initconst = {
> {},
> };
>
> +static bool __init
> +arch_timer_probed(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
> +{
> + struct device_node *dn;
> + bool probed = false;
> +
> + dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches);
> + if (dn && of_device_is_available(dn) && (arch_timers_present & type))
> + probed = true;
> + of_node_put(dn);
> +
> + return probed;
> +}
> +
> static void __init arch_timer_common_init(void)
> {
> unsigned mask = ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER;
>
> /* Wait until both nodes are probed if we have two timers */
> if ((arch_timers_present & mask) != mask) {
> - if (of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_mem_of_match) &&
> - !(arch_timers_present & ARCH_MEM_TIMER))
> + if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_MEM_TIMER, arch_timer_mem_of_match))
> return;
> - if (of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_of_match) &&
> - !(arch_timers_present & ARCH_CP15_TIMER))
> + if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_CP15_TIMER, arch_timer_of_match))
> return;
> }
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: discard unavailable timers correctly
@ 2014-09-24 15:16 ` Sudeep Holla
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2014-09-24 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland
Cc: Daniel Lezcano, Thomas Gleixner, Sudeep Holla, Stephen Boyd
Hi Mark,
On 17/09/14 20:39, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Currently we wait until both cp15 and mem timers are probed if we
> have both timer device nodes present in the device tree without
> checking if the device is actually available. If one of the timer
> device node present is disabled, the system locks up on the boot
> as no timer gets registered.
>
> This patch adds the check for the availablity of the timer device
> so that we unavailable timers are discarded correctly. It also adds
> the missing of_node_put.
>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
If your are fine with this, can I ask Daniel you pick this up ?
Regards,
Sudeep
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Changes v1->v2:
> - Added missing of_node_put in the original code
> - Updated the commit log as suggested
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index 5163ec13429d..7e267e3990ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -616,17 +616,29 @@ static const struct of_device_id arch_timer_mem_of_match[] __initconst = {
> {},
> };
>
> +static bool __init
> +arch_timer_probed(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
> +{
> + struct device_node *dn;
> + bool probed = false;
> +
> + dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches);
> + if (dn && of_device_is_available(dn) && (arch_timers_present & type))
> + probed = true;
> + of_node_put(dn);
> +
> + return probed;
> +}
> +
> static void __init arch_timer_common_init(void)
> {
> unsigned mask = ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER;
>
> /* Wait until both nodes are probed if we have two timers */
> if ((arch_timers_present & mask) != mask) {
> - if (of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_mem_of_match) &&
> - !(arch_timers_present & ARCH_MEM_TIMER))
> + if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_MEM_TIMER, arch_timer_mem_of_match))
> return;
> - if (of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_of_match) &&
> - !(arch_timers_present & ARCH_CP15_TIMER))
> + if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_CP15_TIMER, arch_timer_of_match))
> return;
> }
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: discard unavailable timers correctly
2014-09-24 15:16 ` Sudeep Holla
@ 2014-09-24 15:48 ` Mark Rutland
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2014-09-24 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 04:16:47PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 17/09/14 20:39, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Currently we wait until both cp15 and mem timers are probed if we
> > have both timer device nodes present in the device tree without
> > checking if the device is actually available. If one of the timer
> > device node present is disabled, the system locks up on the boot
> > as no timer gets registered.
> >
> > This patch adds the check for the availablity of the timer device
> > so that we unavailable timers are discarded correctly. It also adds
> > the missing of_node_put.
> >
> > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>
> If your are fine with this, can I ask Daniel you pick this up ?
While I'd prefer to see the cp15 and mmio timer driver pulled apart,
that's not going to happen at any point soon. For the moment, this is
far better than the current state of affairs. So:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
>
> Regards,
> Sudeep
>
> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > Changes v1->v2:
> > - Added missing of_node_put in the original code
> > - Updated the commit log as suggested
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > index 5163ec13429d..7e267e3990ab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > @@ -616,17 +616,29 @@ static const struct of_device_id arch_timer_mem_of_match[] __initconst = {
> > {},
> > };
> >
> > +static bool __init
> > +arch_timer_probed(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *dn;
> > + bool probed = false;
> > +
> > + dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches);
> > + if (dn && of_device_is_available(dn) && (arch_timers_present & type))
> > + probed = true;
> > + of_node_put(dn);
> > +
> > + return probed;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void __init arch_timer_common_init(void)
> > {
> > unsigned mask = ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER;
> >
> > /* Wait until both nodes are probed if we have two timers */
> > if ((arch_timers_present & mask) != mask) {
> > - if (of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_mem_of_match) &&
> > - !(arch_timers_present & ARCH_MEM_TIMER))
> > + if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_MEM_TIMER, arch_timer_mem_of_match))
> > return;
> > - if (of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_of_match) &&
> > - !(arch_timers_present & ARCH_CP15_TIMER))
> > + if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_CP15_TIMER, arch_timer_of_match))
> > return;
> > }
> >
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: discard unavailable timers correctly
@ 2014-09-24 15:48 ` Mark Rutland
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2014-09-24 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sudeep Holla
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Daniel Lezcano,
Thomas Gleixner, Stephen Boyd
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 04:16:47PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 17/09/14 20:39, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Currently we wait until both cp15 and mem timers are probed if we
> > have both timer device nodes present in the device tree without
> > checking if the device is actually available. If one of the timer
> > device node present is disabled, the system locks up on the boot
> > as no timer gets registered.
> >
> > This patch adds the check for the availablity of the timer device
> > so that we unavailable timers are discarded correctly. It also adds
> > the missing of_node_put.
> >
> > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>
> If your are fine with this, can I ask Daniel you pick this up ?
While I'd prefer to see the cp15 and mmio timer driver pulled apart,
that's not going to happen at any point soon. For the moment, this is
far better than the current state of affairs. So:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
>
> Regards,
> Sudeep
>
> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > Changes v1->v2:
> > - Added missing of_node_put in the original code
> > - Updated the commit log as suggested
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > index 5163ec13429d..7e267e3990ab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > @@ -616,17 +616,29 @@ static const struct of_device_id arch_timer_mem_of_match[] __initconst = {
> > {},
> > };
> >
> > +static bool __init
> > +arch_timer_probed(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *dn;
> > + bool probed = false;
> > +
> > + dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches);
> > + if (dn && of_device_is_available(dn) && (arch_timers_present & type))
> > + probed = true;
> > + of_node_put(dn);
> > +
> > + return probed;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void __init arch_timer_common_init(void)
> > {
> > unsigned mask = ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER;
> >
> > /* Wait until both nodes are probed if we have two timers */
> > if ((arch_timers_present & mask) != mask) {
> > - if (of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_mem_of_match) &&
> > - !(arch_timers_present & ARCH_MEM_TIMER))
> > + if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_MEM_TIMER, arch_timer_mem_of_match))
> > return;
> > - if (of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_of_match) &&
> > - !(arch_timers_present & ARCH_CP15_TIMER))
> > + if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_CP15_TIMER, arch_timer_of_match))
> > return;
> > }
> >
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: discard unavailable timers correctly
2014-09-24 15:48 ` Mark Rutland
@ 2014-09-24 15:55 ` Sudeep Holla
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2014-09-24 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 24/09/14 16:48, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 04:16:47PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> On 17/09/14 20:39, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> Currently we wait until both cp15 and mem timers are probed if we
>>> have both timer device nodes present in the device tree without
>>> checking if the device is actually available. If one of the timer
>>> device node present is disabled, the system locks up on the boot
>>> as no timer gets registered.
>>>
>>> This patch adds the check for the availablity of the timer device
>>> so that we unavailable timers are discarded correctly. It also adds
>>> the missing of_node_put.
>>>
>>> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>
>> If your are fine with this, can I ask Daniel you pick this up ?
>
> While I'd prefer to see the cp15 and mmio timer driver pulled apart,
> that's not going to happen at any point soon. For the moment, this is
Agreed :)
> far better than the current state of affairs. So:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>
Thanks
Regards,
Sudeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: discard unavailable timers correctly
@ 2014-09-24 15:55 ` Sudeep Holla
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2014-09-24 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Rutland
Cc: Sudeep Holla, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Daniel Lezcano,
Thomas Gleixner, Stephen Boyd
On 24/09/14 16:48, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 04:16:47PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> On 17/09/14 20:39, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> Currently we wait until both cp15 and mem timers are probed if we
>>> have both timer device nodes present in the device tree without
>>> checking if the device is actually available. If one of the timer
>>> device node present is disabled, the system locks up on the boot
>>> as no timer gets registered.
>>>
>>> This patch adds the check for the availablity of the timer device
>>> so that we unavailable timers are discarded correctly. It also adds
>>> the missing of_node_put.
>>>
>>> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>
>> If your are fine with this, can I ask Daniel you pick this up ?
>
> While I'd prefer to see the cp15 and mmio timer driver pulled apart,
> that's not going to happen at any point soon. For the moment, this is
Agreed :)
> far better than the current state of affairs. So:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>
Thanks
Regards,
Sudeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: discard unavailable timers correctly
2014-09-17 19:39 ` Sudeep Holla
@ 2014-09-24 16:23 ` Sudeep Holla
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2014-09-24 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Currently we wait until both cp15 and mem timers are probed if we
have both timer device nodes present in the device tree without
checking if the device is actually available. If one of the timer
device node present is disabled, the system locks up on the boot
as no timer gets registered.
This patch adds the check for the availability of the timer device
so that unavailable timers are discarded correctly. It also adds
the missing of_node_put.
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
---
drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Hi Daniel,
Can you pick up this fix for v3.18 ?
Regards,
Sudeep
Changes v2->v3:
- Minor nit in the commit message
- Added acks/review tags
Changes v1->v2:
- Added missing of_node_put in the original code
- Updated the commit log as suggested
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index 5163ec13429d..7e267e3990ab 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -616,17 +616,29 @@ static const struct of_device_id arch_timer_mem_of_match[] __initconst = {
{},
};
+static bool __init
+arch_timer_probed(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
+{
+ struct device_node *dn;
+ bool probed = false;
+
+ dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches);
+ if (dn && of_device_is_available(dn) && (arch_timers_present & type))
+ probed = true;
+ of_node_put(dn);
+
+ return probed;
+}
+
static void __init arch_timer_common_init(void)
{
unsigned mask = ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER;
/* Wait until both nodes are probed if we have two timers */
if ((arch_timers_present & mask) != mask) {
- if (of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_mem_of_match) &&
- !(arch_timers_present & ARCH_MEM_TIMER))
+ if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_MEM_TIMER, arch_timer_mem_of_match))
return;
- if (of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_of_match) &&
- !(arch_timers_present & ARCH_CP15_TIMER))
+ if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_CP15_TIMER, arch_timer_of_match))
return;
}
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: discard unavailable timers correctly
@ 2014-09-24 16:23 ` Sudeep Holla
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2014-09-24 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, Daniel Lezcano
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Sudeep Holla
Currently we wait until both cp15 and mem timers are probed if we
have both timer device nodes present in the device tree without
checking if the device is actually available. If one of the timer
device node present is disabled, the system locks up on the boot
as no timer gets registered.
This patch adds the check for the availability of the timer device
so that unavailable timers are discarded correctly. It also adds
the missing of_node_put.
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
---
drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Hi Daniel,
Can you pick up this fix for v3.18 ?
Regards,
Sudeep
Changes v2->v3:
- Minor nit in the commit message
- Added acks/review tags
Changes v1->v2:
- Added missing of_node_put in the original code
- Updated the commit log as suggested
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index 5163ec13429d..7e267e3990ab 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -616,17 +616,29 @@ static const struct of_device_id arch_timer_mem_of_match[] __initconst = {
{},
};
+static bool __init
+arch_timer_probed(int type, const struct of_device_id *matches)
+{
+ struct device_node *dn;
+ bool probed = false;
+
+ dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches);
+ if (dn && of_device_is_available(dn) && (arch_timers_present & type))
+ probed = true;
+ of_node_put(dn);
+
+ return probed;
+}
+
static void __init arch_timer_common_init(void)
{
unsigned mask = ARCH_CP15_TIMER | ARCH_MEM_TIMER;
/* Wait until both nodes are probed if we have two timers */
if ((arch_timers_present & mask) != mask) {
- if (of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_mem_of_match) &&
- !(arch_timers_present & ARCH_MEM_TIMER))
+ if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_MEM_TIMER, arch_timer_mem_of_match))
return;
- if (of_find_matching_node(NULL, arch_timer_of_match) &&
- !(arch_timers_present & ARCH_CP15_TIMER))
+ if (!arch_timer_probed(ARCH_CP15_TIMER, arch_timer_of_match))
return;
}
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread