All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: don't take vcpu mutex for obviously invalid vcpu ioctls
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:08:12 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140922200812.GA9217@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411167805-2458-1-git-send-email-dmatlack@google.com>

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 04:03:25PM -0700, David Matlack wrote:
> vcpu ioctls can hang the calling thread if issued while a vcpu is
> running. 

There is a mutex per-vcpu, so thats expected, OK...

> If we know ioctl is going to be rejected as invalid anyway,
> we can fail before trying to take the vcpu mutex.

Consider a valid ioctl that takes the vcpu mutex. If you need immediate
access for that valid ioctl, it is necessary to interrupt thread
which KVM_RUN ioctl executes. 

So knowledge of whether KVM_RUN is being executed is expected in
userspace (either
that or ask the KVM_RUN thread to run the ioctl for you, as qemu does).

Can't see why having different behaviour for valid/invalid ioctls
is a good thing.

> This patch does not change functionality, it just makes invalid ioctls
> fail faster.

Should not be executing vcpu ioctls without interrupt KVM_RUN in the
first place.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-09-22 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-19 23:03 [PATCH] kvm: don't take vcpu mutex for obviously invalid vcpu ioctls David Matlack
2014-09-22 10:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-22 13:45   ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-09-22 14:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-22 18:35       ` David Matlack
2014-09-22 19:20       ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-09-22 19:29         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-23  6:49           ` Gleb Natapov
2014-09-23  8:06             ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-09-23  8:23               ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-22 19:40         ` David Matlack
2014-09-22 20:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2014-09-22 21:29   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-22 23:00     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-09-22 22:58   ` David Matlack
2014-09-23  0:13     ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140922200812.GA9217@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.