From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/iommu/ddw: Fix endianness
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 18:20:07 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140923182007.5d682c11@kryten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411437529-6126-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>
Hi Alexey,
> ddw_avail is a pointer to the "ibm,ddw-applicable" property which
> contains 3 cells which are big-endian as it is a device tree.
> rtas_call() accepts a RTAS token in CPU-endian. This converts RTAS
> tokens from big-endian to CPU-endian. Since every token is used once
> till guest is rebooted, there is no much sense in caching RTAS tokens
> in CPU-endian.
I see a few sparse endian warnings with this. This patch (that applies
on top of yours) uses of_property_read_u32_array to byte swap and avoid
the need for a number of be32_to_cpu calls.
Can you verify this works and then fold it into yours? Also mark it for
inclusion in stable v3.13+.
You can add:
Reviewed-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Thanks!
Anton
Index: b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
@@ -725,16 +725,18 @@ static void remove_ddw(struct device_nod
{
struct dynamic_dma_window_prop *dwp;
struct property *win64;
- const u32 *ddw_avail;
+ u32 ddw_avail[3];
u64 liobn;
- int len, ret = 0;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "ibm,ddw-applicable",
+ &ddw_avail[0], 3);
- ddw_avail = of_get_property(np, "ibm,ddw-applicable", &len);
win64 = of_find_property(np, DIRECT64_PROPNAME, NULL);
if (!win64)
return;
- if (!ddw_avail || len < 3 * sizeof(u32) || win64->length < sizeof(*dwp))
+ if (ret || win64->length < sizeof(*dwp))
goto delprop;
dwp = win64->value;
@@ -750,7 +752,7 @@ static void remove_ddw(struct device_nod
pr_debug("%s successfully cleared tces in window.\n",
np->full_name);
- ret = rtas_call(be32_to_cpu(ddw_avail[2]), 1, 1, NULL, liobn);
+ ret = rtas_call(ddw_avail[2], 1, 1, NULL, liobn);
if (ret)
pr_warning("%s: failed to remove direct window: rtas returned "
"%d to ibm,remove-pe-dma-window(%x) %llx\n",
@@ -841,7 +843,7 @@ static int query_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev
cfg_addr = edev->pe_config_addr;
buid = edev->phb->buid;
- ret = rtas_call(be32_to_cpu(ddw_avail[0]), 3, 5, (u32 *)query,
+ ret = rtas_call(ddw_avail[0], 3, 5, (u32 *)query,
cfg_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid));
dev_info(&dev->dev, "ibm,query-pe-dma-windows(%x) %x %x %x"
" returned %d\n", ddw_avail[0], cfg_addr, BUID_HI(buid),
@@ -872,7 +874,7 @@ static int create_ddw(struct pci_dev *de
do {
/* extra outputs are LIOBN and dma-addr (hi, lo) */
- ret = rtas_call(be32_to_cpu(ddw_avail[1]), 5, 4, (u32 *)create,
+ ret = rtas_call(ddw_avail[1], 5, 4, (u32 *)create,
cfg_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid),
page_shift, window_shift);
} while (rtas_busy_delay(ret));
@@ -911,7 +913,7 @@ static u64 enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *de
int page_shift;
u64 dma_addr, max_addr;
struct device_node *dn;
- const u32 *uninitialized_var(ddw_avail);
+ u32 ddw_avail[3];
struct direct_window *window;
struct property *win64;
struct dynamic_dma_window_prop *ddwprop;
@@ -943,8 +945,9 @@ static u64 enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *de
* for the given node in that order.
* the property is actually in the parent, not the PE
*/
- ddw_avail = of_get_property(pdn, "ibm,ddw-applicable", &len);
- if (!ddw_avail || len < 3 * sizeof(u32))
+ ret = of_property_read_u32_array(pdn, "ibm,ddw-applicable",
+ &ddw_avail[0], 3);
+ if (ret)
goto out_failed;
/*
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/iommu/ddw: Fix endianness
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 18:20:07 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140923182007.5d682c11@kryten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411437529-6126-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>
Hi Alexey,
> ddw_avail is a pointer to the "ibm,ddw-applicable" property which
> contains 3 cells which are big-endian as it is a device tree.
> rtas_call() accepts a RTAS token in CPU-endian. This converts RTAS
> tokens from big-endian to CPU-endian. Since every token is used once
> till guest is rebooted, there is no much sense in caching RTAS tokens
> in CPU-endian.
I see a few sparse endian warnings with this. This patch (that applies
on top of yours) uses of_property_read_u32_array to byte swap and avoid
the need for a number of be32_to_cpu calls.
Can you verify this works and then fold it into yours? Also mark it for
inclusion in stable v3.13+.
You can add:
Reviewed-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Thanks!
Anton
Index: b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
@@ -725,16 +725,18 @@ static void remove_ddw(struct device_nod
{
struct dynamic_dma_window_prop *dwp;
struct property *win64;
- const u32 *ddw_avail;
+ u32 ddw_avail[3];
u64 liobn;
- int len, ret = 0;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "ibm,ddw-applicable",
+ &ddw_avail[0], 3);
- ddw_avail = of_get_property(np, "ibm,ddw-applicable", &len);
win64 = of_find_property(np, DIRECT64_PROPNAME, NULL);
if (!win64)
return;
- if (!ddw_avail || len < 3 * sizeof(u32) || win64->length < sizeof(*dwp))
+ if (ret || win64->length < sizeof(*dwp))
goto delprop;
dwp = win64->value;
@@ -750,7 +752,7 @@ static void remove_ddw(struct device_nod
pr_debug("%s successfully cleared tces in window.\n",
np->full_name);
- ret = rtas_call(be32_to_cpu(ddw_avail[2]), 1, 1, NULL, liobn);
+ ret = rtas_call(ddw_avail[2], 1, 1, NULL, liobn);
if (ret)
pr_warning("%s: failed to remove direct window: rtas returned "
"%d to ibm,remove-pe-dma-window(%x) %llx\n",
@@ -841,7 +843,7 @@ static int query_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev
cfg_addr = edev->pe_config_addr;
buid = edev->phb->buid;
- ret = rtas_call(be32_to_cpu(ddw_avail[0]), 3, 5, (u32 *)query,
+ ret = rtas_call(ddw_avail[0], 3, 5, (u32 *)query,
cfg_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid));
dev_info(&dev->dev, "ibm,query-pe-dma-windows(%x) %x %x %x"
" returned %d\n", ddw_avail[0], cfg_addr, BUID_HI(buid),
@@ -872,7 +874,7 @@ static int create_ddw(struct pci_dev *de
do {
/* extra outputs are LIOBN and dma-addr (hi, lo) */
- ret = rtas_call(be32_to_cpu(ddw_avail[1]), 5, 4, (u32 *)create,
+ ret = rtas_call(ddw_avail[1], 5, 4, (u32 *)create,
cfg_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid),
page_shift, window_shift);
} while (rtas_busy_delay(ret));
@@ -911,7 +913,7 @@ static u64 enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *de
int page_shift;
u64 dma_addr, max_addr;
struct device_node *dn;
- const u32 *uninitialized_var(ddw_avail);
+ u32 ddw_avail[3];
struct direct_window *window;
struct property *win64;
struct dynamic_dma_window_prop *ddwprop;
@@ -943,8 +945,9 @@ static u64 enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *de
* for the given node in that order.
* the property is actually in the parent, not the PE
*/
- ddw_avail = of_get_property(pdn, "ibm,ddw-applicable", &len);
- if (!ddw_avail || len < 3 * sizeof(u32))
+ ret = of_property_read_u32_array(pdn, "ibm,ddw-applicable",
+ &ddw_avail[0], 3);
+ if (ret)
goto out_failed;
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-23 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-23 1:58 [PATCH v2] powerpc/iommu/ddw: Fix endianness Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-23 1:58 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-23 8:20 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2014-09-23 8:20 ` Anton Blanchard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140923182007.5d682c11@kryten \
--to=anton@samba.org \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.