All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, keir@xen.org, jbeulich@suse.com,
	jun.nakajima@intel.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, tim@xen.org,
	dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
	Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 19/20] x86/VPMU: NMI-based VPMU support
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:52:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140923185225.GU3007@laptop.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411430281-6132-20-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 07:58:00PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Add support for using NMIs as PMU interrupts.

Could you explain what the benefits are vs using the regular vector?

Any why one would wnat to use this?

> 
> Most of processing is still performed by vpmu_do_interrupt(). However, since
> certain operations are not NMI-safe we defer them to a softint that vpmu_do_interrupt()
> will schedule:
> * For PV guests that would be send_guest_vcpu_virq()
> * For HVM guests it's VLAPIC accesses and hvm_get_segment_register() (the later
> can be called in privileged profiling mode when the interrupted guest is an HVM one).
> 
> With send_guest_vcpu_virq() and hvm_get_segment_register() for PV(H) and vlapic
> accesses for HVM moved to sofint, the only routines/macros that vpmu_do_interrupt()
> calls in NMI mode are:
> * memcpy()
> * querying domain type (is_XX_domain())
> * guest_cpu_user_regs()
> * XLAT_cpu_user_regs()
> * raise_softirq()
> * vcpu_vpmu()
> * vpmu_ops->arch_vpmu_save()
> * vpmu_ops->do_interrupt() (in the future for PVH support)

I think you can drop the 'in the future for PVH support' as the codebase until
now looks to have the right bits for PVH support?

> 
> The latter two only access PMU MSRs with {rd,wr}msrl() (not the _safe versions
> which would not be NMI-safe).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
> ---
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c       |   3 +-
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vpmu_core2.c |   3 +-
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c           | 184 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vpmu.h    |   4 +-
>  xen/include/xen/softirq.h         |   1 +
>  5 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c
> index 055b21c..9db0559 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static void amd_vpmu_unset_msr_bitmap(struct vcpu *v)
>      msr_bitmap_off(vpmu);
>  }
>  
> -static int amd_vpmu_do_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> +static int amd_vpmu_do_interrupt(const struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>  {
>      return 1;
>  }
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ static inline void context_save(struct vcpu *v)
>          rdmsrl(counters[i], counter_regs[i]);
>  }
>  
> +/* Must be NMI-safe */
>  static int amd_vpmu_save(struct vcpu *v)
>  {
>      struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v);
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vpmu_core2.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vpmu_core2.c
> index ff0f890..37266ca 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vpmu_core2.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vpmu_core2.c
> @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static inline void __core2_vpmu_save(struct vcpu *v)
>          rdmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS, core2_vpmu_cxt->global_status);
>  }
>  
> +/* Must be NMI-safe */
>  static int core2_vpmu_save(struct vcpu *v)
>  {
>      struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v);
> @@ -707,7 +708,7 @@ static void core2_vpmu_dump(const struct vcpu *v)
>      }
>  }
>  
> -static int core2_vpmu_do_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> +static int core2_vpmu_do_interrupt(const struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>  {
>      struct vcpu *v = current;
>      u64 msr_content;
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c
> index 1e0575a..52f5ce8 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  #include <asm/hvm/svm/svm.h>
>  #include <asm/hvm/svm/vmcb.h>
>  #include <asm/apic.h>
> +#include <asm/nmi.h>
>  #include <public/pmu.h>
>  #include <xen/tasklet.h>
>  
> @@ -53,36 +54,57 @@ uint64_t __read_mostly vpmu_features = 0;
>  static void parse_vpmu_param(char *s);
>  custom_param("vpmu", parse_vpmu_param);
>  
> +static void pmu_softnmi(void);
> +
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vcpu *, last_vcpu);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vcpu *, sampled_vcpu);
> +
> +static uint32_t __read_mostly vpmu_interrupt_type = PMU_APIC_VECTOR;
>  
>  static void __init parse_vpmu_param(char *s)
>  {
> -    switch ( parse_bool(s) )
> -    {
> -    case 0:
> -        break;
> -    default:
> -        if ( !strcmp(s, "bts") )
> -            vpmu_features |= XENPMU_FEATURE_INTEL_BTS;
> -        else if ( *s )
> +    char *ss;
> +
> +    vpmu_mode = XENPMU_MODE_SELF;
> +    if (*s == '\0')
> +        return;
> +
> +    do {
> +        ss = strchr(s, ',');
> +        if ( ss )
> +            *ss = '\0';
> +
> +        switch  ( parse_bool(s) )
>          {
> -            printk("VPMU: unknown flag: %s - vpmu disabled!\n", s);
> -            break;
> +        case 0:
> +            vpmu_mode = XENPMU_MODE_OFF;
> +            /* FALLTHROUGH */
> +        case 1:
> +            return;
> +        default:
> +            if ( !strcmp(s, "nmi") )
> +                vpmu_interrupt_type = APIC_DM_NMI;
> +            else if ( !strcmp(s, "bts") )
> +                vpmu_features |= XENPMU_FEATURE_INTEL_BTS;
> +            else
> +            {
> +                printk("VPMU: unknown flag: %s - vpmu disabled!\n", s);
> +                vpmu_mode = XENPMU_MODE_OFF;
> +                return;
> +            }
>          }
> -        /* fall through */
> -    case 1:
> -        /* Default VPMU mode */
> -        vpmu_mode = XENPMU_MODE_SELF;
> -        break;
> -    }
> +
> +        s = ss + 1;
> +    } while ( ss );
>  }
>  
> +
>  void vpmu_lvtpc_update(uint32_t val)
>  {
>      struct vcpu *curr = current;
>      struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(curr);
>  
> -    vpmu->hw_lapic_lvtpc = PMU_APIC_VECTOR | (val & APIC_LVT_MASKED);
> +    vpmu->hw_lapic_lvtpc = vpmu_interrupt_type | (val & APIC_LVT_MASKED);
>  
>      /* Postpone APIC updates for PV(H) guests if PMU interrupt is pending */
>      if ( is_hvm_domain(curr->domain) ||
> @@ -90,6 +112,24 @@ void vpmu_lvtpc_update(uint32_t val)
>          apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, vpmu->hw_lapic_lvtpc);
>  }
>  
> +static void vpmu_send_interrupt(struct vcpu *v)
> +{
> +    struct vlapic *vlapic;
> +    u32 vlapic_lvtpc;
> +
> +    ASSERT( is_hvm_vcpu(v) );
> +
> +    vlapic = vcpu_vlapic(v);
> +    if ( !is_vlapic_lvtpc_enabled(vlapic) )
> +        return;
> +
> +    vlapic_lvtpc = vlapic_get_reg(vlapic, APIC_LVTPC);
> +    if ( GET_APIC_DELIVERY_MODE(vlapic_lvtpc) == APIC_MODE_FIXED )
> +        vlapic_set_irq(vcpu_vlapic(v), vlapic_lvtpc & APIC_VECTOR_MASK, 0);
> +    else
> +        v->nmi_pending = 1;
> +}
> +
>  int vpmu_do_msr(unsigned int msr, uint64_t *msr_content,
>                  uint64_t supported, bool_t is_write)
>  {
> @@ -150,7 +190,8 @@ static struct vcpu *choose_hwdom_vcpu(void)
>      return v;
>  }
>  
> -int vpmu_do_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> +/* This routine may be called in NMI context */
> +int vpmu_do_interrupt(const struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>  {
>      struct vcpu *sampled = current, *sampling;
>      struct vpmu_struct *vpmu;
> @@ -231,8 +272,9 @@ int vpmu_do_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>                  if ( sampled->arch.flags & TF_kernel_mode )
>                      r->cs &= ~3;
>              }
> -            else
> +            else if ( !(vpmu_interrupt_type & APIC_DM_NMI) )
>              {
> +                /* Unsafe in NMI context, defer to softint later */
>                  struct segment_register seg_cs;
>  
>                  hvm_get_segment_register(sampled, x86_seg_cs, &seg_cs);
> @@ -250,30 +292,30 @@ int vpmu_do_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>          vpmu->hw_lapic_lvtpc |= APIC_LVT_MASKED;
>          apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, vpmu->hw_lapic_lvtpc);
>  
> -        send_guest_vcpu_virq(sampling, VIRQ_XENPMU);
> +        if ( vpmu_interrupt_type & APIC_DM_NMI )
> +        {
> +            this_cpu(sampled_vcpu) = sampled;
> +            raise_softirq(PMU_SOFTIRQ);
> +        }
> +        else
> +            send_guest_vcpu_virq(sampling, VIRQ_XENPMU);
>  
>          return 1;
>      }
>  
>      if ( vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops )
>      {
> -        struct vlapic *vlapic = vcpu_vlapic(sampling);
> -        u32 vlapic_lvtpc;
> -        unsigned char int_vec;
> -
>          if ( !vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->do_interrupt(regs) )
>              return 0;
>  
> -        if ( !is_vlapic_lvtpc_enabled(vlapic) )
> -            return 1;
> -
> -        vlapic_lvtpc = vlapic_get_reg(vlapic, APIC_LVTPC);
> -        int_vec = vlapic_lvtpc & APIC_VECTOR_MASK;
> -
> -        if ( GET_APIC_DELIVERY_MODE(vlapic_lvtpc) == APIC_MODE_FIXED )
> -            vlapic_set_irq(vcpu_vlapic(sampling), int_vec, 0);
> +        if ( vpmu_interrupt_type & APIC_DM_NMI )
> +        {
> +            this_cpu(sampled_vcpu) = sampled;
> +            raise_softirq(PMU_SOFTIRQ);
> +        }
>          else
> -            sampling->nmi_pending = 1;
> +            vpmu_send_interrupt(sampling);
> +
>          return 1;
>      }
>  
> @@ -306,6 +348,8 @@ static void vpmu_save_force(void *arg)
>      vpmu_reset(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_SAVE);
>  
>      per_cpu(last_vcpu, smp_processor_id()) = NULL;
> +
> +    pmu_softnmi();
>  }
>  
>  void vpmu_save(struct vcpu *v)
> @@ -323,7 +367,10 @@ void vpmu_save(struct vcpu *v)
>          if ( vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->arch_vpmu_save(v) )
>              vpmu_reset(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED);
>  
> -    apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, PMU_APIC_VECTOR | APIC_LVT_MASKED);
> +    apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, vpmu_interrupt_type | APIC_LVT_MASKED);
> +
> +    /* Make sure there are no outstanding PMU NMIs */

Could this comment be replicated across all of the callers of
of this function?
> +    pmu_softnmi();
>  }
>  
>  void vpmu_load(struct vcpu *v)
> @@ -377,6 +424,8 @@ void vpmu_load(struct vcpu *v)
>            (vpmu->xenpmu_data->pmu_flags & PMU_CACHED)) )
>          return;
>  
> +    pmu_softnmi();
> +
>      if ( vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops && vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops->arch_vpmu_load )
>      {
>          apic_write_around(APIC_LVTPC, vpmu->hw_lapic_lvtpc);
> @@ -399,7 +448,7 @@ void vpmu_initialise(struct vcpu *v)
>          vpmu_destroy(v);
>      vpmu_clear(vpmu);
>      vpmu->context = NULL;
> -    vpmu->hw_lapic_lvtpc = PMU_APIC_VECTOR | APIC_LVT_MASKED;
> +    vpmu->hw_lapic_lvtpc = vpmu_interrupt_type | APIC_LVT_MASKED;
>  
>      switch ( vendor )
>      {
> @@ -435,11 +484,55 @@ void vpmu_destroy(struct vcpu *v)
>      }
>  }
>  
> +/* Process the softirq set by PMU NMI handler */
> +static void pmu_softnmi(void)
> +{
> +    struct vcpu *v, *sampled = this_cpu(sampled_vcpu);
> +
> +    if ( sampled == NULL )
> +        return;

Add a new line here.
> +    this_cpu(sampled_vcpu) = NULL;

Andrew mentioned to me that doing a single 'this_cpu' means
using 'smp_processor_id()'. And since we are doing this twice, we could
just introduce 'unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id()' and 
then use 'per_cpu(samples_vcpu, cpu)' in this code.

> +
> +    if ( (vpmu_mode & XENPMU_MODE_ALL) ||
> +         (sampled->domain->domain_id >= DOMID_FIRST_RESERVED) )
> +    {
> +            v = choose_hwdom_vcpu();
> +            if ( !v )
> +                return;
> +    }
> +    else
> +    {
> +        if ( is_hvm_domain(sampled->domain) )
> +        {
> +            vpmu_send_interrupt(sampled);
> +            return;
> +        }
> +        v = sampled;
> +    }
> +
> +    if ( has_hvm_container_domain(sampled->domain) )
> +    {
> +        struct segment_register seg_cs;
> +
> +        hvm_get_segment_register(sampled, x86_seg_cs, &seg_cs);
> +        v->arch.vpmu.xenpmu_data->pmu.r.regs.cs = seg_cs.sel;
> +    }
> +
> +    send_guest_vcpu_virq(v, VIRQ_XENPMU);
> +}
> +
> +int pmu_nmi_interrupt(const struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int cpu)
> +{
> +    return vpmu_do_interrupt(regs);
> +}
> +
>  static int pvpmu_init(struct domain *d, xen_pmu_params_t *params)
>  {
>      struct vcpu *v;
>      struct page_info *page;
>      uint64_t gfn = params->val;
> +    static bool_t __read_mostly pvpmu_init_done;
> +    static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(init_lock);
>  
>      if ( (params->vcpu >= d->max_vcpus) || (d->vcpu == NULL) ||
>           (d->vcpu[params->vcpu] == NULL) )
> @@ -463,6 +556,27 @@ static int pvpmu_init(struct domain *d, xen_pmu_params_t *params)
>          return -EINVAL;
>      }
>  
> +    spin_lock(&init_lock);
> +
> +    if ( !pvpmu_init_done )
> +    {
> +        if ( reserve_lapic_nmi() != 0 )
> +        {
> +            spin_unlock(&init_lock);
> +            printk(XENLOG_G_ERR "Failed to reserve PMU NMI\n");
> +            put_page(page);
> +            return -EBUSY;
> +        }
> +
> +        set_nmi_callback(pmu_nmi_interrupt);
> +
> +        open_softirq(PMU_SOFTIRQ, pmu_softnmi);
> +
> +        pvpmu_init_done = 1;
> +    }
> +
> +    spin_unlock(&init_lock);
> +
>      vpmu_initialise(v);
>  
>      return 0;
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vpmu.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vpmu.h
> index a6e7934..7d86f64 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vpmu.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vpmu.h
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct arch_vpmu_ops {
>      int (*do_wrmsr)(unsigned int msr, uint64_t msr_content,
>                      uint64_t supported);
>      int (*do_rdmsr)(unsigned int msr, uint64_t *msr_content);
> -    int (*do_interrupt)(struct cpu_user_regs *regs);
> +    int (*do_interrupt)(const struct cpu_user_regs *regs);
>      void (*do_cpuid)(unsigned int input,
>                       unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx,
>                       unsigned int *ecx, unsigned int *edx);
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static inline bool_t vpmu_are_all_set(const struct vpmu_struct *vpmu,
>  void vpmu_lvtpc_update(uint32_t val);
>  int vpmu_do_msr(unsigned int msr, uint64_t *msr_content,
>                  uint64_t supported, bool_t is_write);
> -int vpmu_do_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs);
> +int vpmu_do_interrupt(const struct cpu_user_regs *regs);
>  void vpmu_do_cpuid(unsigned int input, unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx,
>                                         unsigned int *ecx, unsigned int *edx);
>  void vpmu_initialise(struct vcpu *v);
> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/softirq.h b/xen/include/xen/softirq.h
> index 0c0d481..5829fa4 100644
> --- a/xen/include/xen/softirq.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/softirq.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ enum {
>      NEW_TLBFLUSH_CLOCK_PERIOD_SOFTIRQ,
>      RCU_SOFTIRQ,
>      TASKLET_SOFTIRQ,
> +    PMU_SOFTIRQ,
>      NR_COMMON_SOFTIRQS
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-23 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-22 23:57 [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 00/20] x86/PMU: Xen PMU PV(H) support Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 01/20] common/symbols: Export hypervisor symbols to privileged guest Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 14:28   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 02/20] x86/VPMU: Manage VPMU_CONTEXT_SAVE flag in vpmu_save_force() Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 14:44   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-23 15:06     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 15:26       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 03/20] x86/VPMU: Set MSR bitmaps only for HVM/PVH guests Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 04/20] x86/VPMU: Make vpmu macros a bit more efficient Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 05/20] intel/VPMU: Clean up Intel VPMU code Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 06/20] vmx: Merge MSR management routines Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 14:48   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 07/20] x86/VPMU: Handle APIC_LVTPC accesses Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 08/20] intel/VPMU: MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL should be initialized to zero Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 09/20] x86/VPMU: Add public xenpmu.h Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 10/20] x86/VPMU: Make vpmu not HVM-specific Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 11/20] x86/VPMU: Interface for setting PMU mode and flags Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 14:55   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-23 18:58   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-23 19:24     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 20:47       ` Daniel De Graaf
2014-09-23 21:06         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-24  8:31           ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 12/20] x86/VPMU: Initialize PMU for PV(H) guests Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 14:59   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 13/20] x86/VPMU: Save VPMU state for PV guests during context switch Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 15:01   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-23 15:10     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 15:18       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 14/20] x86/VPMU: When handling MSR accesses, leave fault injection to callers Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 15/20] x86/VPMU: Add support for PMU register handling on PV guests Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 15:08   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-23 15:49     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 16/20] x86/VPMU: Handle PMU interrupts for " Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 17:18   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-23 17:36     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 18:31   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-23 18:36     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-23 18:57     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 19:07       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 17/20] x86/VPMU: Merge vpmu_rdmsr and vpmu_wrmsr Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 18:38   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-22 23:57 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 18/20] x86/VPMU: Add privileged PMU mode Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 18:40   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-22 23:58 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 19/20] x86/VPMU: NMI-based VPMU support Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 18:52   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2014-09-23 19:18     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 19:27       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-22 23:58 ` [PATCH v11 for-xen-4.5 20/20] x86/VPMU: Move VPMU files up from hvm/ directory Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 18:53   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140923185225.GU3007@laptop.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.