Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] devicetree: bindings: Document Renesas JPEG Processing Unit.

[Mikhail Ulianov <mikhail.ulyanov@cogentembedded.com>]

On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:42:57 +0900
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:02:00AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> > 
> > On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:57:20 Simon Horman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:59:46PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Mikhail Ulyanov wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +  - compatible: should containg one of the following:
> > > > > +                       - "renesas,jpu-r8a7790" for R-Car H2
> > > > > +                       - "renesas,jpu-r8a7791" for R-Car M2
> > > > > +                       - "renesas,jpu-gen2" for R-Car second
> > > > > generation
> > > > 
> > > > Isn't "renesas,jpu-gen2" meant as a fallback?
> > > > 
> > > > I.e. the DTS should have one of '7790 and '7791, AND the gen2
> > > > fallback, so we can make the driver match against '7790 and
> > > > '7791 is we find out about an incompatibility.
> > > 
> > > Is there a document that clearly states that there is such a thing
> > > as jpu-gen2 in hardware? If not I would prefer not to add a
> > > binding for it.
> > 
> > How about going the other way around and requesting that document ?
> 
> Good idea, I will make a request.

Hi Simon,

Is there any update on this topic from HW team? 
If no, should i left it as is?