From: Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas-A9uVI2HLR7kOP4wsBPIw7w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-73nT9ZVIoz3k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Stefan Kristiansson
<stefan.kristiansson-MbMCFXIvDHJFcC0YU169RA@public.gmane.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] next: openrisc: Fix build
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:08:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140926180813.GA19291@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411753981.2739.16.camel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:53:01PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> Would you like me to carry this in the audit tree, since I'm the one who
> broke it?
>
Hi Eric,
guess you are asking Jonas, but it would make sense to me.
Guenter
> -Eric
>
> On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 09:05 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > openrisc:defconfig fails to build in next-20140926 with the following error.
> >
> > In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:31:0:
> > ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h: In function 'syscall_get_arch':
> > ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h:77:9: error: 'EM_OPENRISC' undeclared
> >
> > Fix by moving EM_OPENRISC to include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h.
> >
> > Fixes: ce5d112827e5 ("ARCH: AUDIT: implement syscall_get_arch for all arches")
> > Cc: Eric Paris <eparis-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson-MbMCFXIvDHJFcC0YU169RA@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> > v2: Only move EM_OPENRISC.
> >
> > Another possible solution for the problem would be to include asm/elf.h
> > in arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c. I had actually submitted a patch with
> > that fix back in August (maybe that is where I remembered the problem from).
> > Wonder what happened with that patch.
> >
> > Would it make sense to drop EM_OR32 and replace it with EM_OPENRISC where
> > it is used ? binutils seems to suggest that EM_OPENRISC is the "official"
> > definition.
> >
> > arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h | 3 +--
> > include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h b/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> > index f02ea58..8884276 100644
> > --- a/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> > +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> > @@ -55,9 +55,8 @@ typedef elf_greg_t elf_gregset_t[ELF_NGREG];
> > /* A placeholder; OR32 does not have fp support yes, so no fp regs for now. */
> > typedef unsigned long elf_fpregset_t;
> >
> > -/* This should be moved to include/linux/elf.h */
> > +/* EM_OPENRISC is defined in linux/elf-em.h */
> > #define EM_OR32 0x8472
> > -#define EM_OPENRISC 92 /* OpenRISC 32-bit embedded processor */
> >
> > /*
> > * These are used to set parameters in the core dumps.
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h b/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> > index 01529bd..aa90bc9 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> > #define EM_V850 87 /* NEC v850 */
> > #define EM_M32R 88 /* Renesas M32R */
> > #define EM_MN10300 89 /* Panasonic/MEI MN10300, AM33 */
> > +#define EM_OPENRISC 92 /* OpenRISC 32-bit embedded processor */
> > #define EM_BLACKFIN 106 /* ADI Blackfin Processor */
> > #define EM_TI_C6000 140 /* TI C6X DSPs */
> > #define EM_AARCH64 183 /* ARM 64 bit */
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
linux@openrisc.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] next: openrisc: Fix build
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:08:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140926180813.GA19291@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411753981.2739.16.camel@redhat.com>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:53:01PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> Would you like me to carry this in the audit tree, since I'm the one who
> broke it?
>
Hi Eric,
guess you are asking Jonas, but it would make sense to me.
Guenter
> -Eric
>
> On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 09:05 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > openrisc:defconfig fails to build in next-20140926 with the following error.
> >
> > In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:31:0:
> > ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h: In function 'syscall_get_arch':
> > ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h:77:9: error: 'EM_OPENRISC' undeclared
> >
> > Fix by moving EM_OPENRISC to include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h.
> >
> > Fixes: ce5d112827e5 ("ARCH: AUDIT: implement syscall_get_arch for all arches")
> > Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>
> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> > Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > ---
> > v2: Only move EM_OPENRISC.
> >
> > Another possible solution for the problem would be to include asm/elf.h
> > in arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c. I had actually submitted a patch with
> > that fix back in August (maybe that is where I remembered the problem from).
> > Wonder what happened with that patch.
> >
> > Would it make sense to drop EM_OR32 and replace it with EM_OPENRISC where
> > it is used ? binutils seems to suggest that EM_OPENRISC is the "official"
> > definition.
> >
> > arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h | 3 +--
> > include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h b/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> > index f02ea58..8884276 100644
> > --- a/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> > +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> > @@ -55,9 +55,8 @@ typedef elf_greg_t elf_gregset_t[ELF_NGREG];
> > /* A placeholder; OR32 does not have fp support yes, so no fp regs for now. */
> > typedef unsigned long elf_fpregset_t;
> >
> > -/* This should be moved to include/linux/elf.h */
> > +/* EM_OPENRISC is defined in linux/elf-em.h */
> > #define EM_OR32 0x8472
> > -#define EM_OPENRISC 92 /* OpenRISC 32-bit embedded processor */
> >
> > /*
> > * These are used to set parameters in the core dumps.
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h b/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> > index 01529bd..aa90bc9 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> > #define EM_V850 87 /* NEC v850 */
> > #define EM_M32R 88 /* Renesas M32R */
> > #define EM_MN10300 89 /* Panasonic/MEI MN10300, AM33 */
> > +#define EM_OPENRISC 92 /* OpenRISC 32-bit embedded processor */
> > #define EM_BLACKFIN 106 /* ADI Blackfin Processor */
> > #define EM_TI_C6000 140 /* TI C6X DSPs */
> > #define EM_AARCH64 183 /* ARM 64 bit */
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-26 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-26 16:05 [PATCH v2] next: openrisc: Fix build Guenter Roeck
2014-09-26 16:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-09-26 17:51 ` Jonas Bonn
2014-09-26 17:51 ` Jonas Bonn
[not found] ` <5425A7B5.10209-A9uVI2HLR7kOP4wsBPIw7w@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-26 18:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-09-26 18:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-09-27 4:13 ` Stefan Kristiansson
2014-09-27 4:13 ` Stefan Kristiansson
2014-09-26 17:53 ` Eric Paris
[not found] ` <1411753981.2739.16.camel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-26 18:08 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-09-26 18:08 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-09-26 18:18 ` Jonas Bonn
2014-09-26 18:18 ` Jonas Bonn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140926180813.GA19291@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux-0h96xk9xttrk1umjsbkqmq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=eparis-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jonas-A9uVI2HLR7kOP4wsBPIw7w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-73nT9ZVIoz3k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=stefan.kristiansson-MbMCFXIvDHJFcC0YU169RA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.