All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] dmaengine: Make channel allocation callbacks optional
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:39:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141001083917.GG6884@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140928160757.GJ1638@intel.com>

Hi Vinod,

On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 09:37:57PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 10:54:38AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Nowadays, some drivers don't have anything in there channel allocation
> > callbacks anymore.
> > 
> > Remove the BUG_ON if those callbacks aren't implemented, in order to allow
> > drivers to not implement them.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> > index d5d30ed863ce..cfcb181b1184 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> > @@ -817,8 +817,6 @@ int dma_async_device_register(struct dma_device *device)
> >  	BUG_ON(dma_has_cap(DMA_INTERLEAVE, device->cap_mask) &&
> >  		!device->device_prep_interleaved_dma);
> >  
> > -	BUG_ON(!device->device_alloc_chan_resources);
> > -	BUG_ON(!device->device_free_chan_resources);
> Dont think we have drivers without free. IIRC cppi one might be only
> instance

It was more a matter of simmetry to be honest, I'm fine dropping it if
you want.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141001/74b512bf/attachment.sig>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	"Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Antoine Ténart" <antoine@free-electrons.com>,
	lars@metafoo.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] dmaengine: Make channel allocation callbacks optional
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:39:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141001083917.GG6884@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140928160757.GJ1638@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1305 bytes --]

Hi Vinod,

On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 09:37:57PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 10:54:38AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Nowadays, some drivers don't have anything in there channel allocation
> > callbacks anymore.
> > 
> > Remove the BUG_ON if those callbacks aren't implemented, in order to allow
> > drivers to not implement them.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> > index d5d30ed863ce..cfcb181b1184 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> > @@ -817,8 +817,6 @@ int dma_async_device_register(struct dma_device *device)
> >  	BUG_ON(dma_has_cap(DMA_INTERLEAVE, device->cap_mask) &&
> >  		!device->device_prep_interleaved_dma);
> >  
> > -	BUG_ON(!device->device_alloc_chan_resources);
> > -	BUG_ON(!device->device_free_chan_resources);
> Dont think we have drivers without free. IIRC cppi one might be only
> instance

It was more a matter of simmetry to be honest, I'm fine dropping it if
you want.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-01  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-27  8:54 [PATCH 0/9] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities retrieval Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54 ` [PATCH 1/9] dmaengine: Make the destination abbreviation coherent Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54   ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54 ` [PATCH 2/9] dmaengine: Make channel allocation callbacks optional Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54   ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-28 16:07   ` Vinod Koul
2014-09-28 16:07     ` Vinod Koul
2014-10-01  8:39     ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2014-10-01  8:39       ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54 ` [PATCH 3/9] dmaengine: Introduce a device_config callback Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54   ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-28 16:13   ` Vinod Koul
2014-09-28 16:13     ` Vinod Koul
2014-09-28 16:14     ` Vinod Koul
2014-09-28 16:14       ` Vinod Koul
2014-09-27  8:54 ` [PATCH 4/9] dmaengine: split out pause/resume operations from device_control Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54   ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54 ` [PATCH 5/9] dmaengine: Add device_terminate_all callback Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54   ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54 ` [PATCH 6/9] dmaengine: Create a generic dma_slave_caps callback Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54   ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  9:25   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-27  9:25     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-01  8:21     ` Maxime Ripard
2014-10-01  8:21       ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54 ` [PATCH 7/9] dmaengine: Move slave caps to dma_device Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54   ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  9:28   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-27  9:28     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-01  8:27     ` Maxime Ripard
2014-10-01  8:27       ` Maxime Ripard
2014-10-01  8:55       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-01  8:55         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-27  8:54 ` [PATCH 8/9] dmaengine: Mark device_control as deprecated Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54   ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54 ` [PATCH 9/9] dmaengine: sun6i: Convert to generic slave_caps Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27  8:54   ` Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141001083917.GG6884@lukather \
    --to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.