From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Milosz Tanski <milosz@adfin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: add RWF_NONBLOCK support
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 13:29:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141002112952.GA32112@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141001222327.GT4758@dastard>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 08:23:27AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Shouldn't that be:
>
> if (type & XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL) {
> mutex_unlock(&VFS_I(ip)->i_mutex);
Yes, I will resend the fixed version.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Milosz Tanski <milosz@adfin.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: add RWF_NONBLOCK support
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 13:29:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141002112952.GA32112@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141001222327.GT4758@dastard>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 08:23:27AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Shouldn't that be:
>
> if (type & XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL) {
> mutex_unlock(&VFS_I(ip)->i_mutex);
Yes, I will resend the fixed version.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-02 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-01 21:04 preadv2/pwritev2 updates Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 21:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 21:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: add RWF_NONBLOCK support Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 21:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 22:23 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-01 22:23 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-02 11:29 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-10-02 11:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-02 17:33 ` [PATCH 1/3 v2] " Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 21:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs: pass iocb to generic_write_sync Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 21:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 21:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] fs: add a flag for per-operation O_DSYNC semantics Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 21:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-01 22:26 ` preadv2/pwritev2 updates Dave Chinner
2014-10-01 22:26 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-02 11:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-02 11:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-02 21:05 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-02 21:05 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-08 2:58 ` Milosz Tanski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141002112952.GA32112@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=milosz@adfin.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.