From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] gpu/radeon: Move 64-bit MSI quirk from arch to driver
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 09:34:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141002153402.GC18056@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412210062.10667.1.camel@pasglop>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 10:34:22AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> A number of radeon cards have a HW limitation causing them to be
> unable to generate the full 64-bit of address bits for MSIs. This
> breaks MSIs on some platforms such as POWER machines.
>
> We used to have a powerpc specific quirk to address that on a
> single card, but this doesn't scale very well, this is better
> put under control of the drivers who know precisely what a given
> HW revision can do.
>
> This moves the setting of the quirk flag to the radeon driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
>
> v2: This is just adjusted to the new flag name
I'm sorta confused because I got two "v2 2/4" emails a minute or so apart.
I assume they're the same.
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c
> index d41a831..5330f6d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c
> @@ -271,5 +271,4 @@ static void quirk_radeon_32bit_msi(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> dev->no_64bit_msi = true;
> }
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x68f2, quirk_radeon_32bit_msi);
> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0xaa68, quirk_radeon_32bit_msi);
Why do we keep the 0xaa68 quirk? Shouldn't that be made generic, too?
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
> index 16807af..e760671 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
> @@ -202,6 +202,16 @@ static bool radeon_msi_ok(struct radeon_device *rdev)
> if (rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_AGP)
> return false;
>
> + /*
> + * Older chips have a HW limitation, they can only generate 40 bits
> + * of address for "64-bit" MSIs which breaks on some platforms, notably
> + * IBM POWER servers, so we limit them
> + */
> + if (rdev->family < CHIP_BONAIRE) {
> + dev_info(rdev->dev, "radeon: MSI limited to 32-bit\n");
> + rdev->pdev->no_64bit_msi = true;
> + }
> +
> /* force MSI on */
> if (radeon_msi == 1)
> return true;
>
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>,
Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] gpu/radeon: Move 64-bit MSI quirk from arch to driver
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 09:34:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141002153402.GC18056@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412210062.10667.1.camel@pasglop>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 10:34:22AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> A number of radeon cards have a HW limitation causing them to be
> unable to generate the full 64-bit of address bits for MSIs. This
> breaks MSIs on some platforms such as POWER machines.
>
> We used to have a powerpc specific quirk to address that on a
> single card, but this doesn't scale very well, this is better
> put under control of the drivers who know precisely what a given
> HW revision can do.
>
> This moves the setting of the quirk flag to the radeon driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
>
> v2: This is just adjusted to the new flag name
I'm sorta confused because I got two "v2 2/4" emails a minute or so apart.
I assume they're the same.
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c
> index d41a831..5330f6d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c
> @@ -271,5 +271,4 @@ static void quirk_radeon_32bit_msi(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> dev->no_64bit_msi = true;
> }
> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0x68f2, quirk_radeon_32bit_msi);
> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, 0xaa68, quirk_radeon_32bit_msi);
Why do we keep the 0xaa68 quirk? Shouldn't that be made generic, too?
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
> index 16807af..e760671 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq_kms.c
> @@ -202,6 +202,16 @@ static bool radeon_msi_ok(struct radeon_device *rdev)
> if (rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_AGP)
> return false;
>
> + /*
> + * Older chips have a HW limitation, they can only generate 40 bits
> + * of address for "64-bit" MSIs which breaks on some platforms, notably
> + * IBM POWER servers, so we limit them
> + */
> + if (rdev->family < CHIP_BONAIRE) {
> + dev_info(rdev->dev, "radeon: MSI limited to 32-bit\n");
> + rdev->pdev->no_64bit_msi = true;
> + }
> +
> /* force MSI on */
> if (radeon_msi == 1)
> return true;
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-02 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-02 0:34 [PATCH v2 2/4] gpu/radeon: Move 64-bit MSI quirk from arch to driver Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-10-02 0:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-10-02 1:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-10-02 1:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-10-02 15:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2014-10-02 15:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-02 21:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-10-02 21:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-10-02 21:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-02 21:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-02 22:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-10-02 22:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-02 0:33 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-10-02 0:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-10-02 2:18 ` Alex Deucher
2014-10-02 2:18 ` Alex Deucher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141002153402.GC18056@google.com \
--to=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=anton@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.