From: b.galvani@gmail.com (Beniamino Galvani)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] ARM: meson: add meson8 machine definition
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 19:05:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141002170519.GA29052@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11073411.IcmTkIICYA@wuerfel>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 11:24:54AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 October 2014 23:29:41 Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> >
> > +static const char * const m8_common_board_compat[] = {
> > + "amlogic,meson8",
> > + NULL,
> > +};
> > +
> > DT_MACHINE_START(AML8726_MX, "Amlogic Meson6 platform")
> > .dt_compat = m6_common_board_compat,
> > MACHINE_END
> >
> > +DT_MACHINE_START(MESON8, "Amlogic Meson8 platform")
> > + .dt_compat = m8_common_board_compat,
> > +MACHINE_END
> >
>
> I'd just add the meson8 string to the m6_common_board_compat list and
> rename it.
>From what I've seen so far the two families are very similar and share
most of the IP cores, so a unique DT machine is a good idea.
Does the MACH_MESON8 Kconfig symbol still make sense or can I drop it
and rename MACH_MESON6 to MACH_MESON?
Beniamino
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Victor Wan <victor.wan-LpR1jeaWuhtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Ian Campbell
<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
Carlo Caione <carlo-KA+7E9HrN00dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Jerry Cao <jerry.cao-LpR1jeaWuhtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ARM: meson: add meson8 machine definition
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 19:05:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141002170519.GA29052@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11073411.IcmTkIICYA@wuerfel>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 11:24:54AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 October 2014 23:29:41 Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> >
> > +static const char * const m8_common_board_compat[] = {
> > + "amlogic,meson8",
> > + NULL,
> > +};
> > +
> > DT_MACHINE_START(AML8726_MX, "Amlogic Meson6 platform")
> > .dt_compat = m6_common_board_compat,
> > MACHINE_END
> >
> > +DT_MACHINE_START(MESON8, "Amlogic Meson8 platform")
> > + .dt_compat = m8_common_board_compat,
> > +MACHINE_END
> >
>
> I'd just add the meson8 string to the m6_common_board_compat list and
> rename it.
>From what I've seen so far the two families are very similar and share
most of the IP cores, so a unique DT machine is a good idea.
Does the MACH_MESON8 Kconfig symbol still make sense or can I drop it
and rename MACH_MESON6 to MACH_MESON?
Beniamino
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Victor Wan <victor.wan@amlogic.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@caione.org>,
Jerry Cao <jerry.cao@amlogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ARM: meson: add meson8 machine definition
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 19:05:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141002170519.GA29052@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11073411.IcmTkIICYA@wuerfel>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 11:24:54AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 October 2014 23:29:41 Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> >
> > +static const char * const m8_common_board_compat[] = {
> > + "amlogic,meson8",
> > + NULL,
> > +};
> > +
> > DT_MACHINE_START(AML8726_MX, "Amlogic Meson6 platform")
> > .dt_compat = m6_common_board_compat,
> > MACHINE_END
> >
> > +DT_MACHINE_START(MESON8, "Amlogic Meson8 platform")
> > + .dt_compat = m8_common_board_compat,
> > +MACHINE_END
> >
>
> I'd just add the meson8 string to the m6_common_board_compat list and
> rename it.
>From what I've seen so far the two families are very similar and share
most of the IP cores, so a unique DT machine is a good idea.
Does the MACH_MESON8 Kconfig symbol still make sense or can I drop it
and rename MACH_MESON6 to MACH_MESON?
Beniamino
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-02 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-01 21:29 [PATCH 0/6] ARM: add machine and dts files for Amlogic Meson8 Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-01 21:29 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-01 21:29 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-01 21:29 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: meson: add meson8 machine definition Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-01 21:29 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-01 21:29 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-02 9:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-02 9:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-02 17:05 ` Beniamino Galvani [this message]
2014-10-02 17:05 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-02 17:05 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-02 18:29 ` Carlo Caione
2014-10-02 18:29 ` Carlo Caione
2014-10-02 9:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-02 9:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-02 9:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-02 17:08 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-02 17:08 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-02 17:08 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-01 21:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: dts: add dtsi for Amlogic Meson8 SoCs Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-01 21:29 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-01 21:29 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: dts: add dts for Tronsmart S89 Elite TV box Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-01 21:29 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-01 21:29 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-01 21:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] of: add vendor prefix for Tronsmart Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-01 21:29 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-01 21:29 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: document Tronsmart compatible properties Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-01 21:29 ` Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-01 21:29 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: meson: document meson8 " Beniamino Galvani
2014-10-01 21:29 ` Beniamino Galvani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141002170519.GA29052@gmail.com \
--to=b.galvani@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.