From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu: Implement a dummy bus_set_iommu()
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:10:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141015091043.GA13162@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140818165750.GE9809@8bytes.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1159 bytes --]
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 06:57:50PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 02:45:13PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >
> > This allows IOMMU drivers to compile even if IOMMU_API is not selected
> > and helps improve compile coverage.
>
> IOMMU drivers usually implement the IOMMU-API, so they have a strong
> dependency to it. Why do you want to compile-test an iommu driver
> without testing the iommu core-code as well?
It seems like I never got back to you on this. The reason here is that
for Tegra the IOMMU is part of a larger IP block. The IP block is
primarily a memory controller with a bunch of configuration knobs for
arbitration, prioritization and whatnot. A smaller part of the device
does the IOMMU translation. Therefore the IOMMU implementation would
be part of a larger driver, and having this dummy would reduce the
amount of #ifdefs required.
bus_set_iommu() is also the only function in include/linux/iommu.h that
doesn't have a dummy, so it seemed like a natural thing to do.
That said, I can work around this being absent for !IOMMU_API.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: thierry.reding@gmail.com (Thierry Reding)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] iommu: Implement a dummy bus_set_iommu()
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:10:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141015091043.GA13162@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140818165750.GE9809@8bytes.org>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 06:57:50PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 02:45:13PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >
> > This allows IOMMU drivers to compile even if IOMMU_API is not selected
> > and helps improve compile coverage.
>
> IOMMU drivers usually implement the IOMMU-API, so they have a strong
> dependency to it. Why do you want to compile-test an iommu driver
> without testing the iommu core-code as well?
It seems like I never got back to you on this. The reason here is that
for Tegra the IOMMU is part of a larger IP block. The IP block is
primarily a memory controller with a bunch of configuration knobs for
arbitration, prioritization and whatnot. A smaller part of the device
does the IOMMU translation. Therefore the IOMMU implementation would
be part of a larger driver, and having this dummy would reduce the
amount of #ifdefs required.
bus_set_iommu() is also the only function in include/linux/iommu.h that
doesn't have a dummy, so it seemed like a natural thing to do.
That said, I can work around this being absent for !IOMMU_API.
Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141015/cc11222d/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-15 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-01 12:45 [PATCH 1/2] iommu: Always define struct iommu_ops Thierry Reding
2014-08-01 12:45 ` Thierry Reding
2014-08-01 12:45 ` Thierry Reding
[not found] ` <1406897113-20099-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-08-01 12:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu: Implement a dummy bus_set_iommu() Thierry Reding
2014-08-01 12:45 ` Thierry Reding
2014-08-01 12:45 ` Thierry Reding
[not found] ` <1406897113-20099-2-git-send-email-thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-08-18 16:57 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-08-18 16:57 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-08-18 16:57 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-10-15 9:10 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2014-10-15 9:10 ` Thierry Reding
2014-10-22 14:29 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-10-22 14:29 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-10-22 14:29 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <20141022142922.GH10074-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-10-23 8:09 ` Thierry Reding
2014-10-23 8:09 ` Thierry Reding
2014-10-23 8:09 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141015091043.GA13162@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.