From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>,
Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 09/10] memory-hotplug: Remove "weak" from memory_block_size_bytes() declaration
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:23:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141016092307.4a5981f7@mschwide> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo4fS1fdNvur13LZVYomWdmjZnYO49Gc9BJv_BRxAXX3GA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:38:02 -0600
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
> [+cc Rashika, Nathan, Anton, Blanchard, Heiko, Yinghai, Martin,
> linux-s390; sorry, I botched my "stg mail" so you weren't included the
> first time. s390 and x86 define their own memory_block_size_bytes()
> and are at risk for this problem.]
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
> > drivers/base/memory.c provides a default memory_block_size_bytes()
> > definition explicitly marked "weak". Several architectures provide their
> > own definitions intended to override the default, but the "weak" attribute
> > on the declaration applied to the arch definitions as well, so the linker
> > chose one based on link order (see 10629d711ed7 ("PCI: Remove __weak
> > annotation from pcibios_get_phb_of_node decl")).
> >
> > Remove the "weak" attribute from the declaration so we always prefer a
> > non-weak definition over the weak one, independent of link order.
> >
> > Fixes: 41f107266b19 ("drivers: base: Add prototype declaration to the header file")
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > CC: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>
> > CC: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com>
> > CC: Anton Blanchard <anton@au1.ibm.com>
> > CC: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> > CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > include/linux/memory.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memory.h b/include/linux/memory.h
> > index bb7384e3c3d8..8b8d8d12348e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memory.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memory.h
> > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct memory_block {
> > };
> >
> > int arch_get_memory_phys_device(unsigned long start_pfn);
> > -unsigned long __weak memory_block_size_bytes(void);
> > +unsigned long memory_block_size_bytes(void);
> >
> > /* These states are exposed to userspace as text strings in sysfs */
> > #define MEM_ONLINE (1<<0) /* exposed to userspace */
> >
s390 works fine with the __weak on memory_bloc_size_bytes.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-16 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-15 17:05 [PATCH v1 00/10] Remove weak function declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 17:05 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] audit: Remove "weak" from audit_classify_compat_syscall() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 17:02 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-15 17:05 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] x86, intel-mid: Remove "weak" from function declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-17 0:42 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2014-10-17 1:41 ` David Cohen
2014-10-20 16:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-20 17:55 ` David Cohen
2014-10-16 5:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] MIPS: CPC: Make mips_cpc_phys_base() static Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-21 20:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] MIPS: Remove "weak" from platform_maar_init() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-21 20:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] MIPS: MT: Move "weak" from vpe_run() declaration to definition Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 13:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-21 20:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] clocksource: Remove "weak" from clocksource_default_clock() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 17:36 ` John Stultz
2014-10-15 23:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 7:22 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2014-10-16 13:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 13:45 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2014-10-16 5:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] vmcore: Remove "weak" from function declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 7:23 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2014-10-16 20:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] kgdb: Remove "weak" from kgdb_arch_pc() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 13:38 ` Vineet Gupta
2014-10-17 7:59 ` Vineet Gupta
2014-10-20 16:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 0:07 ` Harvey Harrison
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] memory-hotplug: Remove "weak" from memory_block_size_bytes() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 7:23 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] uprobes: Remove "weak" from function declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 5:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-10-16 5:57 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-10-15 18:27 ` [PATCH v1 00/10] Remove weak " Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141016092307.4a5981f7@mschwide \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nfont@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rashika.kheria@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.