From: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
To: sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/10] x86, intel-mid: Remove "weak" from function declarations
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 18:41:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141017014128.GA4513@psi-dev26.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <544065E3.4060909@linux.intel.com>
Hi Bjorn and Sathya,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 05:42:11PM -0700, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On 10/15/2014 04:26 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >[+cc David, Kuppuswamy, x86; sorry, I botched my "stg mail" so you
> >weren't included the first time]
> >
> >On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
> >>For the following interfaces:
> >>
> >> get_penwell_ops()
> >> get_cloverview_ops()
> >> get_tangier_ops()
> >>
> >>there is only one implementation, so they do not need to be marked "weak".
> >>
> >>Remove the "weak" attribute from their declarations.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >>CC: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
> >>CC: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> >>CC: x86@kernel.org
> >>---
> >> arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h | 7 +++----
> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h
> >>index 46aa25c8ce06..3c1c3866d82b 100644
> >>--- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h
> Please remove this file and move the contents to asm/intel-mid.h.
I partially agree :)
Historically, this file was created because we could not build all intel
mid variants at once. So we have to select only one during compilation
time, which was fixed already.
But we don't need to expose those functions outside intel-mid's
directory, which means asm/intel-mid.h isn't the best option IMHO.
If you want, I can send a small re-work instead: we get rid of this
header file completely and simplify a bit what is exposed by
asm/intel-mid.h. Or you can keep this patch and then I send the re-work
on top of it. Anyway I'm fine.
Br, David
> >>+++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h
> >>@@ -10,10 +10,9 @@
> >> */
> >>
> >>
> >>-/* __attribute__((weak)) makes these declarations overridable */
> >> /* For every CPU addition a new get_<cpuname>_ops interface needs
> >> * to be added.
> >> */
> >>-extern void *get_penwell_ops(void) __attribute__((weak));
> >>-extern void *get_cloverview_ops(void) __attribute__((weak));
> >>-extern void *get_tangier_ops(void) __attribute__((weak));
> >>+extern void *get_penwell_ops(void);
> >>+extern void *get_cloverview_ops(void);
> >>+extern void *get_tangier_ops(void);
> >>
>
> --
> Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
> Android kernel developer
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-17 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-15 17:05 [PATCH v1 00/10] Remove weak function declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 17:05 ` [PATCH v1 01/10] audit: Remove "weak" from audit_classify_compat_syscall() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 17:02 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-15 17:05 ` [PATCH v1 02/10] x86, intel-mid: Remove "weak" from function declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-17 0:42 ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2014-10-17 1:41 ` David Cohen [this message]
2014-10-20 16:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-20 17:55 ` David Cohen
2014-10-16 5:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 03/10] MIPS: CPC: Make mips_cpc_phys_base() static Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-21 20:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 04/10] MIPS: Remove "weak" from platform_maar_init() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-21 20:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 05/10] MIPS: MT: Move "weak" from vpe_run() declaration to definition Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 13:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-21 20:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 06/10] clocksource: Remove "weak" from clocksource_default_clock() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 17:36 ` John Stultz
2014-10-15 23:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 7:22 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2014-10-16 13:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 13:45 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2014-10-16 5:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 07/10] vmcore: Remove "weak" from function declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 7:23 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2014-10-16 20:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 08/10] kgdb: Remove "weak" from kgdb_arch_pc() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 13:38 ` Vineet Gupta
2014-10-17 7:59 ` Vineet Gupta
2014-10-20 16:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 0:07 ` Harvey Harrison
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 09/10] memory-hotplug: Remove "weak" from memory_block_size_bytes() declaration Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 7:23 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2014-10-15 17:06 ` [PATCH v1 10/10] uprobes: Remove "weak" from function declarations Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-15 23:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-16 5:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-10-16 5:57 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-10-15 18:27 ` [PATCH v1 00/10] Remove weak " Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141017014128.GA4513@psi-dev26.jf.intel.com \
--to=david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.