From: steve.capper@linaro.org (Steve Capper)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/4] arm64:numa: adding numa support for arm64 platforms.
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:30:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141020143045.GA10233@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141020142555.GA9968@linaro.org>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:25:56PM +0100, Steve Capper wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:49:56PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
[...]
> /*Proximity Distance matrix for 4Node system
> > <from-node to-node distance>
> > */
> > node-matrix= <0 0 10>,
> > <0 1 20>,
> > <0 2 30>,
> > <0 3 10>,
> > <1 0 20>,
> > <1 1 10>,
> > <1 2 30>,
> > <1 3 10>,
> > <2 0 30>,
> > <2 1 20>,
> > <2 2 10>,
> > <2 3 10>,
> > <3 0 10>,
> > <3 1 20>,
> > <3 2 30>,
> > <3 3 10>,
> > }
>
> Hi Ganapat,
> The above caught my attention.
>
> For a 4-node system do we not need 16 distances; the implication of that
> would be that the distance between node A-B could be different from the
> distance between B-A? Also the distance from a node to itself could be
> safely assumed to be zero?
>
> I think we should have a symmetric matrix with zero-diagonals so strictly
> only seven values would need specifying for a 4-node system.
s/seven/six/
I really need to learn how to count.... :-/
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Steve
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steve Capper <steve.capper-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni
<ganapatrao.kulkarni-M3mlKVOIwJVv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
"grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
<grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
<robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Leif Lindholm
<leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Roy Franz <roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] arm64:numa: adding numa support for arm64 platforms.
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:30:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141020143045.GA10233@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141020142555.GA9968-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:25:56PM +0100, Steve Capper wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:49:56PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
[...]
> /*Proximity Distance matrix for 4Node system
> > <from-node to-node distance>
> > */
> > node-matrix= <0 0 10>,
> > <0 1 20>,
> > <0 2 30>,
> > <0 3 10>,
> > <1 0 20>,
> > <1 1 10>,
> > <1 2 30>,
> > <1 3 10>,
> > <2 0 30>,
> > <2 1 20>,
> > <2 2 10>,
> > <2 3 10>,
> > <3 0 10>,
> > <3 1 20>,
> > <3 2 30>,
> > <3 3 10>,
> > }
>
> Hi Ganapat,
> The above caught my attention.
>
> For a 4-node system do we not need 16 distances; the implication of that
> would be that the distance between node A-B could be different from the
> distance between B-A? Also the distance from a node to itself could be
> safely assumed to be zero?
>
> I think we should have a symmetric matrix with zero-diagonals so strictly
> only seven values would need specifying for a 4-node system.
s/seven/six/
I really need to learn how to count.... :-/
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-20 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-25 9:03 [RFC PATCH 0/4] arm64:numa: Add numa support for arm64 platforms Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-09-25 9:03 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-09-25 9:03 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] arm64: defconfig: increase NR_CPUS range to 2-128 Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-09-25 9:03 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-10-03 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-03 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-06 4:29 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-10-06 4:29 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-09-25 9:03 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] arm/arm64:dt:numa: adding numa node mapping for memory nodes Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-09-25 9:03 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-10-03 11:05 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-03 11:05 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-06 4:20 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-10-06 4:20 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-10-06 11:08 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-06 11:08 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-06 17:26 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-10-06 17:26 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-09-25 9:03 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] arm64:thunder: Add initial dts for Cavium Thunder SoC in 2 Node topology Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-09-25 9:03 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-10-03 11:19 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-03 11:19 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-25 9:03 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] arm64:numa: adding numa support for arm64 platforms Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-09-25 9:03 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-10-03 12:13 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-03 12:13 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-06 5:14 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-10-06 5:14 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-10-06 11:26 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-06 11:26 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-06 17:52 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-10-06 17:52 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-10-17 17:19 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-10-17 17:19 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-10-20 14:25 ` Steve Capper
2014-10-20 14:25 ` Steve Capper
2014-10-20 14:30 ` Steve Capper [this message]
2014-10-20 14:30 ` Steve Capper
2014-10-22 11:27 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-10-22 11:27 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-10-28 8:48 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-10-29 7:20 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-09-25 9:04 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2014-09-25 9:04 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141020143045.GA10233@linaro.org \
--to=steve.capper@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.