From: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com (Dmitry Torokhov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: rockchip: add suspend/resume functions
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:50:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141021165013.GD8609@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413862968-2691-1-git-send-email-zyw@rock-chips.com>
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:42:48PM -0700, zyw at rock-chips.com wrote:
> From: Chris <zyw@rock-chips.com>
>
> support suspend/resume of pinctrl, it allows handling sleep mode
> for hogged pins in pinctrl
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris <zyw@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Zhong <zyw@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
>
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
> index d0f3c18..d384d99 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
> @@ -1795,6 +1795,31 @@ static struct rockchip_pin_ctrl *rockchip_pinctrl_get_soc_data(
> return ctrl;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int rockchip_pinctrl_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + pm_message_t state)
> +{
> + struct rockchip_pinctrl *info;
> +
> + info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + if (!info)
> + return -EINVAL;
I do not think info can ever be NULL here, can it?
> +
> + return pinctrl_force_sleep(info->pctl_dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int rockchip_pinctrl_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct rockchip_pinctrl *info;
> +
> + info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + if (!info)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return pinctrl_force_default(info->pctl_dev);
> +}
> +#endif
You are using legacy-style PM methods which we are trying to get away
from. The preferred style is:
static int __maybe_unused rockchip_pinctrl_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
...
}
static in __maybe_unused rockchip_pinctrl_resume(struct device *dev)
{
...
}
static SIMPLE_DE_PM_OPS(rockchip_pinctrl_pm_ops,
rockchip_pinctrl_suspend, rockchip_pinctrl_resume);
> +
> static int rockchip_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct rockchip_pinctrl *info;
> @@ -2010,6 +2035,10 @@ static struct platform_driver rockchip_pinctrl_driver = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .of_match_table = rockchip_pinctrl_dt_match,
And here
.pm = &rockchip_pinctrl_pm_ops,
> },
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: zyw@rock-chips.com
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
dianders@chromium.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: rockchip: add suspend/resume functions
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:50:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141021165013.GD8609@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413862968-2691-1-git-send-email-zyw@rock-chips.com>
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:42:48PM -0700, zyw@rock-chips.com wrote:
> From: Chris <zyw@rock-chips.com>
>
> support suspend/resume of pinctrl, it allows handling sleep mode
> for hogged pins in pinctrl
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris <zyw@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Zhong <zyw@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
>
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
> index d0f3c18..d384d99 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
> @@ -1795,6 +1795,31 @@ static struct rockchip_pin_ctrl *rockchip_pinctrl_get_soc_data(
> return ctrl;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int rockchip_pinctrl_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + pm_message_t state)
> +{
> + struct rockchip_pinctrl *info;
> +
> + info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + if (!info)
> + return -EINVAL;
I do not think info can ever be NULL here, can it?
> +
> + return pinctrl_force_sleep(info->pctl_dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int rockchip_pinctrl_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct rockchip_pinctrl *info;
> +
> + info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + if (!info)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return pinctrl_force_default(info->pctl_dev);
> +}
> +#endif
You are using legacy-style PM methods which we are trying to get away
from. The preferred style is:
static int __maybe_unused rockchip_pinctrl_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
...
}
static in __maybe_unused rockchip_pinctrl_resume(struct device *dev)
{
...
}
static SIMPLE_DE_PM_OPS(rockchip_pinctrl_pm_ops,
rockchip_pinctrl_suspend, rockchip_pinctrl_resume);
> +
> static int rockchip_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct rockchip_pinctrl *info;
> @@ -2010,6 +2035,10 @@ static struct platform_driver rockchip_pinctrl_driver = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .of_match_table = rockchip_pinctrl_dt_match,
And here
.pm = &rockchip_pinctrl_pm_ops,
> },
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-21 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-21 3:41 [PATCH v3 0/6] add suspend support for RK3288 zyw at rock-chips.com
2014-10-21 3:41 ` zyw
2014-10-21 3:41 ` zyw-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw
2014-10-21 3:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: rockchip: add suspend/resume functions zyw at rock-chips.com
2014-10-21 3:42 ` zyw
2014-10-21 16:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2014-10-21 16:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-10-21 21:20 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-10-21 21:20 ` Heiko Stübner
2014-10-21 3:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] pinctrl: rockchip: save and restore gpio6_c6 pinmux in suspend/resume zyw at rock-chips.com
2014-10-21 3:43 ` zyw
2014-10-28 15:52 ` Linus Walleij
2014-10-28 15:52 ` Linus Walleij
2014-10-28 16:05 ` Doug Anderson
2014-10-28 16:05 ` Doug Anderson
2014-10-21 3:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] clk: rockchip: RK3288: add suspend and resume zyw at rock-chips.com
2014-10-21 3:44 ` zyw
2014-10-21 3:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] ARM: rockchip: add suspend and resume for RK3288 zyw at rock-chips.com
2014-10-21 3:44 ` zyw
2014-10-24 21:47 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-10-24 21:47 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-10-24 21:47 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-10-27 17:42 ` Doug Anderson
2014-10-27 17:42 ` Doug Anderson
2014-10-21 3:44 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ARM: rockchip: Add pmu-sram binding zyw at rock-chips.com
2014-10-21 3:44 ` zyw
2014-10-21 3:45 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] ARM: dts: add RK3288 suspend support zyw at rock-chips.com
2014-10-21 3:45 ` zyw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141021165013.GD8609@dtor-ws \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.