All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:47:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141022104742.GD22642@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413966107-11881-1-git-send-email-chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 09:21:46AM +0100, chai wen wrote:
> Idx sanity check was once implemented separately in these counter handling
> functions and then return value was treated as a judgement.
> 	armv7_pmnc_select_counter()
> 	armv7_pmnc_enable_counter()
> 	armv7_pmnc_disable_counter()
> 	armv7_pmnc_enable_intens()
> 	armv7_pmnc_disable_intens()
> But we do not need to do this now, and the return of idx is useless.
>
> Signed-off-by: chai wen <chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>

It looks like the validation was moved out of all of these functions in
7279adbd9bb8ef8f (ARM: perf: check ARMv7 counter validity on a per-pmu
basis), and we just missed the opportunity to simplify callers at the
time.

It would be nice if we mentioned that in the commit message -- it takes
a while to figure out and it's handy for reference.

> ---
>  arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c |   32 ++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
> index 116758b..f66a9b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
> @@ -564,13 +564,11 @@ static inline int armv7_pmnc_counter_has_overflowed(u32 pmnc, int idx)
>  	return pmnc & BIT(ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx));
>  }
>  
> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_select_counter(int idx)
> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_select_counter(int idx)
>  {
>  	u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 5" : : "r" (counter));
>  	isb();
> -
> -	return idx;
>  }
>  
>  static inline u32 armv7pmu_read_counter(struct perf_event *event)
> @@ -585,8 +583,10 @@ static inline u32 armv7pmu_read_counter(struct perf_event *event)
>  			smp_processor_id(), idx);
>  	else if (idx == ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER)
>  		asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : "=r" (value));
> -	else if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx)
> +	else {
> +		armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx);
>  		asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : "=r" (value));
> +	}

Please make the braces consistent -- if one branch in an if .. else
chain needs them, they all do (see Documentation/CodingStyle).

>  
>  	return value;
>  }
> @@ -602,40 +602,38 @@ static inline void armv7pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u32 value)
>  			smp_processor_id(), idx);
>  	else if (idx == ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER)
>  		asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : : "r" (value));
> -	else if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx)
> +	else {
> +		armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx);
>  		asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : : "r" (value));
> +	}

Likewise here.

Otherwise this looks like a nice cleanup to me, so with those changes:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thanks,
Mark.

>  }
>  
>  static inline void armv7_pmnc_write_evtsel(int idx, u32 val)
>  {
> -	if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx) {
> -		val &= ARMV7_EVTYPE_MASK;
> -		asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 1" : : "r" (val));
> -	}
> +	armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx);
> +	val &= ARMV7_EVTYPE_MASK;
> +	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 1" : : "r" (val));
>  }
>  
> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_enable_counter(int idx)
> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_enable_counter(int idx)
>  {
>  	u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 1" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
> -	return idx;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(int idx)
> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(int idx)
>  {
>  	u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 2" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
> -	return idx;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_enable_intens(int idx)
> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_enable_intens(int idx)
>  {
>  	u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c14, 1" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
> -	return idx;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx)
> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx)
>  {
>  	u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c14, 2" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
> @@ -643,8 +641,6 @@ static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx)
>  	/* Clear the overflow flag in case an interrupt is pending. */
>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 3" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
>  	isb();
> -
> -	return idx;
>  }
>  
>  static inline u32 armv7_pmnc_getreset_flags(void)
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: chai wen <chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"yuichi.kusakabe@jp.fujitsu.com" <yuichi.kusakabe@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:47:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141022104742.GD22642@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413966107-11881-1-git-send-email-chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 09:21:46AM +0100, chai wen wrote:
> Idx sanity check was once implemented separately in these counter handling
> functions and then return value was treated as a judgement.
> 	armv7_pmnc_select_counter()
> 	armv7_pmnc_enable_counter()
> 	armv7_pmnc_disable_counter()
> 	armv7_pmnc_enable_intens()
> 	armv7_pmnc_disable_intens()
> But we do not need to do this now, and the return of idx is useless.
>
> Signed-off-by: chai wen <chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>

It looks like the validation was moved out of all of these functions in
7279adbd9bb8ef8f (ARM: perf: check ARMv7 counter validity on a per-pmu
basis), and we just missed the opportunity to simplify callers at the
time.

It would be nice if we mentioned that in the commit message -- it takes
a while to figure out and it's handy for reference.

> ---
>  arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c |   32 ++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
> index 116758b..f66a9b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
> @@ -564,13 +564,11 @@ static inline int armv7_pmnc_counter_has_overflowed(u32 pmnc, int idx)
>  	return pmnc & BIT(ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx));
>  }
>  
> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_select_counter(int idx)
> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_select_counter(int idx)
>  {
>  	u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 5" : : "r" (counter));
>  	isb();
> -
> -	return idx;
>  }
>  
>  static inline u32 armv7pmu_read_counter(struct perf_event *event)
> @@ -585,8 +583,10 @@ static inline u32 armv7pmu_read_counter(struct perf_event *event)
>  			smp_processor_id(), idx);
>  	else if (idx == ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER)
>  		asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : "=r" (value));
> -	else if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx)
> +	else {
> +		armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx);
>  		asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : "=r" (value));
> +	}

Please make the braces consistent -- if one branch in an if .. else
chain needs them, they all do (see Documentation/CodingStyle).

>  
>  	return value;
>  }
> @@ -602,40 +602,38 @@ static inline void armv7pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u32 value)
>  			smp_processor_id(), idx);
>  	else if (idx == ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER)
>  		asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : : "r" (value));
> -	else if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx)
> +	else {
> +		armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx);
>  		asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : : "r" (value));
> +	}

Likewise here.

Otherwise this looks like a nice cleanup to me, so with those changes:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thanks,
Mark.

>  }
>  
>  static inline void armv7_pmnc_write_evtsel(int idx, u32 val)
>  {
> -	if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx) {
> -		val &= ARMV7_EVTYPE_MASK;
> -		asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 1" : : "r" (val));
> -	}
> +	armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx);
> +	val &= ARMV7_EVTYPE_MASK;
> +	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 1" : : "r" (val));
>  }
>  
> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_enable_counter(int idx)
> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_enable_counter(int idx)
>  {
>  	u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 1" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
> -	return idx;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(int idx)
> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(int idx)
>  {
>  	u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 2" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
> -	return idx;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_enable_intens(int idx)
> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_enable_intens(int idx)
>  {
>  	u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c14, 1" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
> -	return idx;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx)
> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx)
>  {
>  	u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c14, 2" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
> @@ -643,8 +641,6 @@ static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx)
>  	/* Clear the overflow flag in case an interrupt is pending. */
>  	asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 3" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
>  	isb();
> -
> -	return idx;
>  }
>  
>  static inline u32 armv7_pmnc_getreset_flags(void)
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-22 10:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-22  8:21 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling chai wen
2014-10-22  8:21 ` chai wen
2014-10-22  8:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: perf: armv7: wrap unsupported arch init functions via micro chai wen
2014-10-22  8:21   ` chai wen
2014-10-22 11:01   ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-22 11:01     ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-22 11:22     ` Chai Wen
2014-10-22 11:22       ` Chai Wen
2014-10-22 10:47 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2014-10-22 10:47   ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling Mark Rutland
2014-10-22 11:26   ` Chai Wen
2014-10-22 11:26     ` Chai Wen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141022104742.GD22642@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.