From: Brian Vandre <bvandre@gmail.com>
To: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jic23@kernel.org,
alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
marex@denx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Staging: iio: adc: fix line over 80 characters
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 21:02:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141023020213.GA30907@brian-U> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54484219.5000708@gmx.de>
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:47:37AM +0200, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> Sudip Mukherjee schrieb am 22.10.2014 06:21:
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 05:56:47PM -0500, Brian Vandre wrote:
> >> This fixes the 2 checkpatch.pl warnings:
> >> WARNING: line over 80 characters
> >>
> > please check your patch with --strict option of checkpatch.pl , and you will get :
> > "Alignment should match open parenthesis" .
> >
> Good point, but what solution would you propose?
Hey All,
Thanks for all the feedback. This is my first attempt at a patch so I thank you all
for helping me through it. I have a question about the strict option on checkpatch.pl.
I thought that the stict option was not necessarily part of the coding standards but
more of a nice to have. Should I be always using the strict option?
On this particular patch if I were to align to the open parenthesis it would push the
comment "/* trigger DELAY unit#3 */" off to the next line which I thought we be less
clear. If --strict is optional then I would argue to leave it the way it is, but again
this is my first time and I am learning.
If I were to align to the parenthesis should I just move the comment to the next line
or possibly delete the comment altogether? The code is clear and the comment might not
be necessary but I didn't want to remove anything the original author wrote.
Thanks,
Brian Vandre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-23 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-21 2:48 [PATCH 0/2] Staging: iio: adc: Checkpatch.pl warning cleanups Brian Vandre
2014-10-21 2:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] Staging: iio: adc: fix line over 80 characters Brian Vandre
2014-10-23 10:39 ` Daniel Baluta
2014-10-21 2:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Brian Vandre
2014-10-21 7:29 ` [PATCH 0/2] Staging: iio: adc: Checkpatch.pl warning cleanups Alexandre Belloni
2014-10-21 22:56 ` [PATCH v2] " Brian Vandre
2014-10-21 22:56 ` [PATCH v2] Staging: iio: adc: fix line over 80 characters Brian Vandre
2014-10-22 4:21 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2014-10-22 23:47 ` Hartmut Knaack
2014-10-23 2:02 ` Brian Vandre [this message]
2014-10-23 3:23 ` Joe Perches
2014-10-23 9:46 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2014-10-23 10:50 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-10-23 12:42 ` Brian Vandre
2014-10-23 12:53 ` Brian Vandre
2014-10-23 13:27 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141023020213.GA30907@brian-U \
--to=bvandre@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.