All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] mm: new function to forbid zeropage mappings for a process
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:19:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141023121948.51e4a6cb@mschwide> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413976170-42501-1-git-send-email-dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:09:26 +0200
Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> s390 has the special notion of storage keys which are some sort of page flags
> associated with physical pages and live outside of direct addressable memory.
> These storage keys can be queried and changed with a special set of instructions.
> The mentioned instructions behave quite nicely under virtualization, if there is: 
> - an invalid pte, then the instructions will work on memory in the host page table
> - a valid pte, then the instructions will work with the real storage key
> 
> Thanks to Martin with his software reference and dirty bit tracking,
> the kernel does not issue any storage key instructions as now a 
> software based approach will be taken, on the other hand distributions 
> in the wild are currently using them.
> 
> However, for virtualized guests we still have a problem with guest pages 
> mapped to zero pages and the kernel same page merging.  
> With each one multiple guest pages will point to the same physical page
> and share the same storage key.
> 
> Let's fix this by introducing a new function which s390 will define to
> forbid new zero page mappings.  If the guest issues a storage key related 
> instruction we flag the mm_struct, drop existing zero page mappings
> and unmerge the guest memory.
> 
> v2 -> v3:
>  - Clearing up patch description Patch 3/4
>  - removing unnecessary flag in mmu_context (Paolo)
> 
> v1 -> v2: 
>  - Following Dave and Paolo suggestion removing the vma flag
> 
> Dominik Dingel (4):
>   s390/mm: recfactor global pgste updates
>   mm: introduce mm_forbids_zeropage function
>   s390/mm: prevent and break zero page mappings in case of storage keys
>   s390/mm: disable KSM for storage key enabled pages
> 
>  arch/s390/include/asm/pgalloc.h |   2 -
>  arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h |   8 +-
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c        |   2 +-
>  arch/s390/kvm/priv.c            |  17 ++--
>  arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c          | 180 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  include/linux/mm.h              |   4 +
>  mm/huge_memory.c                |   2 +-
>  mm/memory.c                     |   2 +-
>  8 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
 
Patches look good to me and as nobody seems to disagree with the proposed
solution I will add the code to the features branch of the s390 tree.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux390@de.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] mm: new function to forbid zeropage mappings for a process
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:19:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141023121948.51e4a6cb@mschwide> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413976170-42501-1-git-send-email-dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:09:26 +0200
Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> s390 has the special notion of storage keys which are some sort of page flags
> associated with physical pages and live outside of direct addressable memory.
> These storage keys can be queried and changed with a special set of instructions.
> The mentioned instructions behave quite nicely under virtualization, if there is: 
> - an invalid pte, then the instructions will work on memory in the host page table
> - a valid pte, then the instructions will work with the real storage key
> 
> Thanks to Martin with his software reference and dirty bit tracking,
> the kernel does not issue any storage key instructions as now a 
> software based approach will be taken, on the other hand distributions 
> in the wild are currently using them.
> 
> However, for virtualized guests we still have a problem with guest pages 
> mapped to zero pages and the kernel same page merging.  
> With each one multiple guest pages will point to the same physical page
> and share the same storage key.
> 
> Let's fix this by introducing a new function which s390 will define to
> forbid new zero page mappings.  If the guest issues a storage key related 
> instruction we flag the mm_struct, drop existing zero page mappings
> and unmerge the guest memory.
> 
> v2 -> v3:
>  - Clearing up patch description Patch 3/4
>  - removing unnecessary flag in mmu_context (Paolo)
> 
> v1 -> v2: 
>  - Following Dave and Paolo suggestion removing the vma flag
> 
> Dominik Dingel (4):
>   s390/mm: recfactor global pgste updates
>   mm: introduce mm_forbids_zeropage function
>   s390/mm: prevent and break zero page mappings in case of storage keys
>   s390/mm: disable KSM for storage key enabled pages
> 
>  arch/s390/include/asm/pgalloc.h |   2 -
>  arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h |   8 +-
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c        |   2 +-
>  arch/s390/kvm/priv.c            |  17 ++--
>  arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c          | 180 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  include/linux/mm.h              |   4 +
>  mm/huge_memory.c                |   2 +-
>  mm/memory.c                     |   2 +-
>  8 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
 
Patches look good to me and as nobody seems to disagree with the proposed
solution I will add the code to the features branch of the s390 tree.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux390@de.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] mm: new function to forbid zeropage mappings for a process
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:19:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141023121948.51e4a6cb@mschwide> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413976170-42501-1-git-send-email-dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:09:26 +0200
Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> s390 has the special notion of storage keys which are some sort of page flags
> associated with physical pages and live outside of direct addressable memory.
> These storage keys can be queried and changed with a special set of instructions.
> The mentioned instructions behave quite nicely under virtualization, if there is: 
> - an invalid pte, then the instructions will work on memory in the host page table
> - a valid pte, then the instructions will work with the real storage key
> 
> Thanks to Martin with his software reference and dirty bit tracking,
> the kernel does not issue any storage key instructions as now a 
> software based approach will be taken, on the other hand distributions 
> in the wild are currently using them.
> 
> However, for virtualized guests we still have a problem with guest pages 
> mapped to zero pages and the kernel same page merging.  
> With each one multiple guest pages will point to the same physical page
> and share the same storage key.
> 
> Let's fix this by introducing a new function which s390 will define to
> forbid new zero page mappings.  If the guest issues a storage key related 
> instruction we flag the mm_struct, drop existing zero page mappings
> and unmerge the guest memory.
> 
> v2 -> v3:
>  - Clearing up patch description Patch 3/4
>  - removing unnecessary flag in mmu_context (Paolo)
> 
> v1 -> v2: 
>  - Following Dave and Paolo suggestion removing the vma flag
> 
> Dominik Dingel (4):
>   s390/mm: recfactor global pgste updates
>   mm: introduce mm_forbids_zeropage function
>   s390/mm: prevent and break zero page mappings in case of storage keys
>   s390/mm: disable KSM for storage key enabled pages
> 
>  arch/s390/include/asm/pgalloc.h |   2 -
>  arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h |   8 +-
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c        |   2 +-
>  arch/s390/kvm/priv.c            |  17 ++--
>  arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c          | 180 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  include/linux/mm.h              |   4 +
>  mm/huge_memory.c                |   2 +-
>  mm/memory.c                     |   2 +-
>  8 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
 
Patches look good to me and as nobody seems to disagree with the proposed
solution I will add the code to the features branch of the s390 tree.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-23 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-22 11:09 [PATCH v3 0/4] mm: new function to forbid zeropage mappings for a process Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09 ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09 ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09 ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] s390/mm: recfactor global pgste updates Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09   ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09   ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09   ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: introduce mm_forbids_zeropage function Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09   ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09   ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09   ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 13:59   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-22 13:59     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-22 13:59     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-22 13:59     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-22 19:22   ` Andrew Morton
2014-10-22 19:22     ` Andrew Morton
2014-10-22 19:22     ` Andrew Morton
2014-10-22 19:22     ` Andrew Morton
2014-10-22 19:45     ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 19:45       ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 19:45       ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 19:49       ` Andrew Morton
2014-10-22 19:49         ` Andrew Morton
2014-10-22 19:49         ` Andrew Morton
2014-10-22 19:49         ` Andrew Morton
2014-10-22 11:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] s390/mm: prevent and break zero page mappings in case of storage keys Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09   ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09   ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09   ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 14:00   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-22 14:00     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-22 14:00     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-22 14:00     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-22 11:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] s390/mm: disable KSM for storage key enabled pages Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09   ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09   ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 11:09   ` Dominik Dingel
2014-10-22 14:00   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-22 14:00     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-22 14:00     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-22 14:00     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-22 13:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] mm: new function to forbid zeropage mappings for a process Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-22 13:59   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-22 13:59   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-22 13:59   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-23 10:19 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2014-10-23 10:19   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2014-10-23 10:19   ` Martin Schwidefsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141023121948.51e4a6cb@mschwide \
    --to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lliubbo@gmail.com \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nasa4836@gmail.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.