From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: UKSM: What's maintainers think about it?
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 21:32:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141025213201.005762f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGqmi77uR2Nems6fE_XM1t3a06OwuqJP-0yOMOQh7KH13vzdzw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 22:25:56 +0300 Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good time of day, people.
> I try to find 'mm' subsystem specific people and lists, but list
> linux-mm looks dead and mail archive look like deprecated.
> If i must to sent this message to another list or add CC people, let me know.
linux-mm@kvack.org is alive and well.
> If questions are already asked (i can't find activity before), feel
> free to kick me.
>
> The main questions:
> 1. Somebody test it? I see many reviews about it.
> I already port it to latest linux-next-git kernel and its work without issues.
> http://pastebin.com/6FMuKagS
> (if it matter, i can describe use cases and results, if somebody ask it)
>
> 2. Developers of UKSM already tried to merge it? Somebody talked with uksm devs?
> offtop: now i try to communicate with dev's on kerneldedup.org forum,
> but i have problems with email verification and wait admin
> registration approval.
> (i already sent questions to
> http://kerneldedup.org/forum/home.php?mod=space&username=xianai ,
> because him looks like team leader)
>
> 3. I just want collect feedbacks from linux maintainers team, if you
> decide what UKSM not needed in kernel, all other comments (as i
> understand) not matter.
>
> Like KSM, but better.
> UKSM - Ultra Kernel Samepage Merging
> http://kerneldedup.org/en/projects/uksm/introduction/
It's the first I've heard of it. No, as far as I know there has been
no attempt to upstream UKSM.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: UKSM: What's maintainers think about it?
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 21:32:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141025213201.005762f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGqmi77uR2Nems6fE_XM1t3a06OwuqJP-0yOMOQh7KH13vzdzw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 22:25:56 +0300 Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good time of day, people.
> I try to find 'mm' subsystem specific people and lists, but list
> linux-mm looks dead and mail archive look like deprecated.
> If i must to sent this message to another list or add CC people, let me know.
linux-mm@kvack.org is alive and well.
> If questions are already asked (i can't find activity before), feel
> free to kick me.
>
> The main questions:
> 1. Somebody test it? I see many reviews about it.
> I already port it to latest linux-next-git kernel and its work without issues.
> http://pastebin.com/6FMuKagS
> (if it matter, i can describe use cases and results, if somebody ask it)
>
> 2. Developers of UKSM already tried to merge it? Somebody talked with uksm devs?
> offtop: now i try to communicate with dev's on kerneldedup.org forum,
> but i have problems with email verification and wait admin
> registration approval.
> (i already sent questions to
> http://kerneldedup.org/forum/home.php?mod=space&username=xianai ,
> because him looks like team leader)
>
> 3. I just want collect feedbacks from linux maintainers team, if you
> decide what UKSM not needed in kernel, all other comments (as i
> understand) not matter.
>
> Like KSM, but better.
> UKSM - Ultra Kernel Samepage Merging
> http://kerneldedup.org/en/projects/uksm/introduction/
It's the first I've heard of it. No, as far as I know there has been
no attempt to upstream UKSM.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-26 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-25 19:25 UKSM: What's maintainers think about it? Timofey Titovets
2014-10-26 4:32 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2014-10-26 4:32 ` Andrew Morton
2014-10-28 13:31 ` Marco A Benatto
2014-10-28 13:31 ` Marco A Benatto
2014-10-28 13:59 ` Timofey Titovets
2014-10-28 13:59 ` Timofey Titovets
2014-10-28 16:08 ` Marco A Benatto
2014-10-28 16:08 ` Marco A Benatto
2014-10-28 17:40 ` Marco A Benatto
2014-10-28 17:40 ` Marco A Benatto
2014-10-28 21:36 ` Timofey Titovets
2014-11-08 0:58 ` [RFC PATCH] KSM: Auto add flag new VMA as VM_MERGEABLE Timofey Titovets
2014-11-08 0:58 ` Timofey Titovets
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-10-30 3:19 UKSM: What's maintainers think about it? Matt
2014-10-30 4:40 ` Timofey Titovets
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141025213201.005762f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nefelim4ag@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.