All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: OMAP baseline test results for v3.18-rc1
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:53:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141027155344.GK2542@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410201810160.4472@utopia.booyaka.com>

* Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [141023 08:21]:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> 
> > Boot-time memory difference
> > (delta in bytes from test_v3.17-rc7 (fe82dcec644244676d55a1384c958d5f67979adb))
> >   avail  rsrvd   high  freed  board          kconfig
> >  -117908k -13164k      .  -148k  2420n800    omap2plus_defconfig_n800_only_a
> >  -1012k  1012k      .      .  2430sdp        omap2plus_defconfig
> >  -1268k  1268k      .    16k  3530es31beagle omap2plus_defconfig
> >  -1268k  1268k      .    16k  3530es3beagle  omap2plus_defconfig
> >  -1780k  1780k      .    16k  3730beaglexm   omap2plus_defconfig
> >  -1780k  1780k      .    16k  3730es12beaglexmomap2plus_defconfig
> >  -1268k  1268k      .    16k  37xxevm        omap2plus_defconfig
> >  -2780k  2780k -16384k    16k  4460pandaes    omap2plus_defconfig
> >  -2776k  2776k -16384k    16k  4460varsomom   omap2plus_defconfig
> >  -4848k  4848k -16384k    16k  5430es2sbct54  omap2plus_defconfig
> >  -4800k  4800k -16384k    16k  5430es2uevm    omap2plus_defconfig
> >   -996k   996k      .     8k  am335xbone     omap2plus_defconfig_am33xx_only
> >  -1268k  1268k      .    16k  am335xbonelt   omap2plus_defconfig
> > 
> > 
> > The size of an omap2plus_defconfig kernel has increased by 760K - a 
> > remarkable increase that fortunately does not appear to be matched by 
> > runtime memory consumption.
> 
> Well let's take that back.  I seem to have glazed over the 1 to 4MB (!) 
> runtime memory usage increases in boot memory consumption.  That is also 
> an extraordinary increase.

Probably mostly caused by 673ce00c5d6c (ARM: omap2plus_defconfig: Add
support for distros with systemd). But I bet actually at least ipv6
can be a loadable module here, I'll take a look.

Regards,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: OMAP baseline test results for v3.18-rc1
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:53:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141027155344.GK2542@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410201810160.4472@utopia.booyaka.com>

* Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> [141023 08:21]:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> 
> > Boot-time memory difference
> > (delta in bytes from test_v3.17-rc7 (fe82dcec644244676d55a1384c958d5f67979adb))
> >   avail  rsrvd   high  freed  board          kconfig
> >  -117908k -13164k      .  -148k  2420n800    omap2plus_defconfig_n800_only_a
> >  -1012k  1012k      .      .  2430sdp        omap2plus_defconfig
> >  -1268k  1268k      .    16k  3530es31beagle omap2plus_defconfig
> >  -1268k  1268k      .    16k  3530es3beagle  omap2plus_defconfig
> >  -1780k  1780k      .    16k  3730beaglexm   omap2plus_defconfig
> >  -1780k  1780k      .    16k  3730es12beaglexmomap2plus_defconfig
> >  -1268k  1268k      .    16k  37xxevm        omap2plus_defconfig
> >  -2780k  2780k -16384k    16k  4460pandaes    omap2plus_defconfig
> >  -2776k  2776k -16384k    16k  4460varsomom   omap2plus_defconfig
> >  -4848k  4848k -16384k    16k  5430es2sbct54  omap2plus_defconfig
> >  -4800k  4800k -16384k    16k  5430es2uevm    omap2plus_defconfig
> >   -996k   996k      .     8k  am335xbone     omap2plus_defconfig_am33xx_only
> >  -1268k  1268k      .    16k  am335xbonelt   omap2plus_defconfig
> > 
> > 
> > The size of an omap2plus_defconfig kernel has increased by 760K - a 
> > remarkable increase that fortunately does not appear to be matched by 
> > runtime memory consumption.
> 
> Well let's take that back.  I seem to have glazed over the 1 to 4MB (!) 
> runtime memory usage increases in boot memory consumption.  That is also 
> an extraordinary increase.

Probably mostly caused by 673ce00c5d6c (ARM: omap2plus_defconfig: Add
support for distros with systemd). But I bet actually at least ipv6
can be a loadable module here, I'll take a look.

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-27 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-20 18:09 OMAP baseline test results for v3.18-rc1 Paul Walmsley
2014-10-20 18:09 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-10-20 18:13 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-10-20 18:13   ` Paul Walmsley
2014-10-27 15:53   ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2014-10-27 15:53     ` Tony Lindgren
2014-10-27 19:59     ` Tony Lindgren
2014-10-27 19:59       ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141027155344.GK2542@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.