All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: vfp: Fix VFPv3 hwcap detection on CPUID based cpus
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:54:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141028175459.GE12469@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141028121154.GA12136@arm.com>

On 10/28, Will Deacon wrote:
> 
> Sure. There's a spelling mistake ("arhitecture") which you should fix,
> but the code looks ok.

Ok I'll fix it up and send it off to the patch tracker if I don't
hear anything else.

> > 
> > I have an RFC for the undef handler written up, except for the
> > big/little thing. Let me post it. Is there anyone from the userspace
> > side that can be on Cc?
> 
> Off the top of my head:
> 
>   Mans Rullgard (already replied to this thread)
>   Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> [QEMU]
>   Jacob Bramley <jacob.bramley@arm.com> [JITs]
>   Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com> [GCC]
> 

Thanks. I'll add them to the patch for next round and add them on
Cc for the current patch on the list.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: vfp: Fix VFPv3 hwcap detection on CPUID based cpus
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:54:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141028175459.GE12469@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141028121154.GA12136@arm.com>

On 10/28, Will Deacon wrote:
> 
> Sure. There's a spelling mistake ("arhitecture") which you should fix,
> but the code looks ok.

Ok I'll fix it up and send it off to the patch tracker if I don't
hear anything else.

> > 
> > I have an RFC for the undef handler written up, except for the
> > big/little thing. Let me post it. Is there anyone from the userspace
> > side that can be on Cc?
> 
> Off the top of my head:
> 
>   Mans Rullgard (already replied to this thread)
>   Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> [QEMU]
>   Jacob Bramley <jacob.bramley@arm.com> [JITs]
>   Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com> [GCC]
> 

Thanks. I'll add them to the patch for next round and add them on
Cc for the current patch on the list.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-28 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-14 13:48 [PATCH v2 0/3] VFP fixes Stephen Boyd
2014-10-14 13:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-14 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: vfp: Workaround bad MVFR1 register on some Kraits Stephen Boyd
2014-10-14 13:48   ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-14 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: vfp: Fix VFPv3 hwcap detection on CPUID based cpus Stephen Boyd
2014-10-14 13:48   ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-27 10:31   ` Will Deacon
2014-10-27 10:31     ` Will Deacon
2014-10-27 11:49     ` Måns Rullgård
2014-10-27 11:49       ` Måns Rullgård
2014-10-27 11:49       ` Måns Rullgård
2014-10-27 19:50     ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-27 19:50       ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-28 12:11       ` Will Deacon
2014-10-28 12:11         ` Will Deacon
2014-10-28 17:54         ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2014-10-28 17:54           ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-14 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm: vfp: Bounce undefined instructions in vectored mode Stephen Boyd
2014-10-14 13:48   ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-16 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] VFP fixes Rob Clark
2014-10-16 13:14   ` Rob Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141028175459.GE12469@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.