From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: [PATCH] netdev: Fix sleeping inside wait event
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:16:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141029161657.GF3337@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141028142541.GA19097@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4046 bytes --]
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:25:41PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> [ 122.247299] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 122.247328] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 61 at kernel/sched/core.c:7312 __might_sleep+0x50/0x249()
> [ 122.247334] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=2 set at [<c106ffd9>] prepare_to_wait+0x3c/0x5f
> [ 122.247339] Modules linked in:
> [ 122.247349] CPU: 0 PID: 61 Comm: kworker/u2:1 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc2-00037-g24574709 #136
> [ 122.247350] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> [ 122.247368] Workqueue: netns cleanup_net
> [ 122.247377] c1071d83 d2b83dd8 d2b83dac c15887b1 d2b83dc8 c104c4c6 00001c90 c1068ebf
> [ 122.247383] 00000000 c17b67e3 0000026d d2b83de0 c104c508 00000009 d2b83dd8 c17b5d4b
> [ 122.247388] d2b83df4 d2b83e0c c1068ebf c17b5cec 00001c90 c17b5d4b 00000002 c106ffd9
> [ 122.247389] Call Trace:
> [ 122.247393] [<c1071d83>] ? down_trylock+0x23/0x2c
> [ 122.247402] [<c15887b1>] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
> [ 122.247413] [<c104c4c6>] warn_slowpath_common+0x66/0x7d
> [ 122.247416] [<c1068ebf>] ? __might_sleep+0x50/0x249
> [ 122.247419] [<c104c508>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x2b/0x2f
> [ 122.247422] [<c1068ebf>] __might_sleep+0x50/0x249
> [ 122.247424] [<c106ffd9>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x3c/0x5f
> [ 122.247426] [<c106ffd9>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x3c/0x5f
> [ 122.247432] [<c158c364>] mutex_lock_nested+0x23/0x347
> [ 122.247436] [<c1075105>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd
> [ 122.247439] [<c158eb0c>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x66/0x78
> [ 122.247445] [<c1570e10>] rtnl_lock+0x14/0x16
> [ 122.247449] [<c156516b>] default_device_exit_batch+0x54/0xf3
> [ 122.247452] [<c1570e1f>] ? rtnl_unlock+0xd/0xf
> [ 122.247454] [<c1070233>] ? __wake_up_sync+0x12/0x12
> [ 122.247461] [<c155e35d>] ops_exit_list+0x20/0x40
> [ 122.247464] [<c155ec96>] cleanup_net+0xbe/0x140
> [ 122.247473] [<c105ffe4>] process_one_work+0x29e/0x643
> [ 122.247479] [<c1061215>] worker_thread+0x23a/0x311
> [ 122.247482] [<c1060fdb>] ? rescuer_thread+0x204/0x204
> [ 122.247486] [<c10648cc>] kthread+0xbe/0xc3
> [ 122.247490] [<c158f4c0>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x30
> [ 122.247492] [<c106480e>] ? kthread_stop+0x364/0x364
> [ 122.247495] ---[ end trace 2073c37ae3c8b3b4 ]---
Ah, more of that. Thanks!
Dave, this relies on bits currently in tip/sched/core, if you're ok I'll
merge it through that tree.
---
Subject: netdev: Fix sleeping inside wait event
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Wed Oct 29 17:04:56 CET 2014
rtnl_lock_unregistering() takes rtnl_lock() -- a mutex -- inside a
wait loop. The wait loop relies on current->state to function, but so
does mutex_lock(), nesting them makes for the inner to destroy the
outer state.
Fix this using the new wait_woken() bits.
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
net/core/dev.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -7196,11 +7196,10 @@ static void __net_exit rtnl_lock_unregis
*/
struct net *net;
bool unregistering;
- DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+ DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
+ add_wait_queue(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
for (;;) {
- prepare_to_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait,
- TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
unregistering = false;
rtnl_lock();
list_for_each_entry(net, net_list, exit_list) {
@@ -7212,9 +7211,10 @@ static void __net_exit rtnl_lock_unregis
if (!unregistering)
break;
__rtnl_unlock();
- schedule();
+
+ wait_woken(&wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
}
- finish_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
+ remove_wait_queue(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
}
static void __net_exit default_device_exit_batch(struct list_head *net_list)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: LKP <lkp@01.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
ebiederm@xmission.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: [PATCH] netdev: Fix sleeping inside wait event
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:16:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141029161657.GF3337@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141028142541.GA19097@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:25:41PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> [ 122.247299] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 122.247328] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 61 at kernel/sched/core.c:7312 __might_sleep+0x50/0x249()
> [ 122.247334] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=2 set at [<c106ffd9>] prepare_to_wait+0x3c/0x5f
> [ 122.247339] Modules linked in:
> [ 122.247349] CPU: 0 PID: 61 Comm: kworker/u2:1 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc2-00037-g24574709 #136
> [ 122.247350] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> [ 122.247368] Workqueue: netns cleanup_net
> [ 122.247377] c1071d83 d2b83dd8 d2b83dac c15887b1 d2b83dc8 c104c4c6 00001c90 c1068ebf
> [ 122.247383] 00000000 c17b67e3 0000026d d2b83de0 c104c508 00000009 d2b83dd8 c17b5d4b
> [ 122.247388] d2b83df4 d2b83e0c c1068ebf c17b5cec 00001c90 c17b5d4b 00000002 c106ffd9
> [ 122.247389] Call Trace:
> [ 122.247393] [<c1071d83>] ? down_trylock+0x23/0x2c
> [ 122.247402] [<c15887b1>] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
> [ 122.247413] [<c104c4c6>] warn_slowpath_common+0x66/0x7d
> [ 122.247416] [<c1068ebf>] ? __might_sleep+0x50/0x249
> [ 122.247419] [<c104c508>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x2b/0x2f
> [ 122.247422] [<c1068ebf>] __might_sleep+0x50/0x249
> [ 122.247424] [<c106ffd9>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x3c/0x5f
> [ 122.247426] [<c106ffd9>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x3c/0x5f
> [ 122.247432] [<c158c364>] mutex_lock_nested+0x23/0x347
> [ 122.247436] [<c1075105>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd
> [ 122.247439] [<c158eb0c>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x66/0x78
> [ 122.247445] [<c1570e10>] rtnl_lock+0x14/0x16
> [ 122.247449] [<c156516b>] default_device_exit_batch+0x54/0xf3
> [ 122.247452] [<c1570e1f>] ? rtnl_unlock+0xd/0xf
> [ 122.247454] [<c1070233>] ? __wake_up_sync+0x12/0x12
> [ 122.247461] [<c155e35d>] ops_exit_list+0x20/0x40
> [ 122.247464] [<c155ec96>] cleanup_net+0xbe/0x140
> [ 122.247473] [<c105ffe4>] process_one_work+0x29e/0x643
> [ 122.247479] [<c1061215>] worker_thread+0x23a/0x311
> [ 122.247482] [<c1060fdb>] ? rescuer_thread+0x204/0x204
> [ 122.247486] [<c10648cc>] kthread+0xbe/0xc3
> [ 122.247490] [<c158f4c0>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x30
> [ 122.247492] [<c106480e>] ? kthread_stop+0x364/0x364
> [ 122.247495] ---[ end trace 2073c37ae3c8b3b4 ]---
Ah, more of that. Thanks!
Dave, this relies on bits currently in tip/sched/core, if you're ok I'll
merge it through that tree.
---
Subject: netdev: Fix sleeping inside wait event
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Wed Oct 29 17:04:56 CET 2014
rtnl_lock_unregistering() takes rtnl_lock() -- a mutex -- inside a
wait loop. The wait loop relies on current->state to function, but so
does mutex_lock(), nesting them makes for the inner to destroy the
outer state.
Fix this using the new wait_woken() bits.
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
net/core/dev.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -7196,11 +7196,10 @@ static void __net_exit rtnl_lock_unregis
*/
struct net *net;
bool unregistering;
- DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+ DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
+ add_wait_queue(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
for (;;) {
- prepare_to_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait,
- TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
unregistering = false;
rtnl_lock();
list_for_each_entry(net, net_list, exit_list) {
@@ -7212,9 +7211,10 @@ static void __net_exit rtnl_lock_unregis
if (!unregistering)
break;
__rtnl_unlock();
- schedule();
+
+ wait_woken(&wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
}
- finish_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
+ remove_wait_queue(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
}
static void __net_exit default_device_exit_batch(struct list_head *net_list)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-29 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-28 14:25 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 61 at kernel/sched/core.c:7312 __might_sleep() Fengguang Wu
2014-10-28 14:25 ` Fengguang Wu
2014-10-29 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-10-29 16:16 ` [PATCH] netdev: Fix sleeping inside wait event Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-29 16:29 ` Cong Wang
2014-10-29 16:29 ` Cong Wang
2014-10-29 17:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-29 17:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-29 17:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-29 17:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-29 17:38 ` David Miller
2014-10-29 17:38 ` David Miller
2014-11-04 16:09 ` [tip:sched/core] netdev, sched/wait: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-29 17:37 ` [PATCH] netdev: " David Miller
2014-10-29 17:37 ` David Miller
2015-02-01 3:43 ` __might_sleep() warnings on v3.19-rc6 Fengguang Wu
2015-02-01 3:43 ` Fengguang Wu
2015-02-01 23:03 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-01 23:03 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-02 4:58 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-02 4:58 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-02 5:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-02 5:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-02 6:09 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-02 6:09 ` NeilBrown
2015-02-05 16:16 ` Chris Mason
2015-02-05 16:16 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141029161657.GF3337@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.