Re: [PATCHv6 8/8] usb: dwc2: move usb_disabled() call to host driver only

[Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2471 bytes --]

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:35:24AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/28/14, 8:26 PM, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> >> From: dinguyen@opensource.altera.com [mailto:dinguyen@opensource.altera.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 4:26 PM
> >>
> >> Now that platform.c will get built for both Host and Gadget, if we leave the
> >> usb_disabled() call in platform.c, it results in the following build error
> >> when (!USB && USB_GADGET) condition is met.
> >>
> >> ERROR: "usb_disabled" [drivers/usb/dwc2/dwc2_platform.ko] undefined!
> >>
> >> Since usb_disabled() is mostly used to disable USB host functionality, move
> >> the call the host portion for the DWC2 driver.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd.c      | 3 +++
> >>  drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c | 3 ---
> >>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd.c
> >> index fa49c72..b741997 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd.c
> >> @@ -2780,6 +2780,9 @@ int dwc2_hcd_init(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg, int irq,
> >>  	int i, num_channels;
> >>  	int retval;
> >>
> >> +	if (usb_disabled())
> >> +		return -ENODEV;
> >> +
> >>  	dev_dbg(hsotg->dev, "DWC OTG HCD INIT\n");
> >>
> >>  	/* Detect config values from hardware */
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c
> >> index 77c8417..123cf54 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c
> >> @@ -157,9 +157,6 @@ static int dwc2_driver_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> >>  	int retval;
> >>  	int irq;
> >>
> >> -	if (usb_disabled())
> >> -		return -ENODEV;
> >> -
> >>  	match = of_match_device(dwc2_of_match_table, &dev->dev);
> >>  	if (match && match->data) {
> >>  		params = match->data;
> > 
> > I'm confused. You are saying the build is broken until patch 8/8 is
> > applied? As always, that is not acceptable. You need to fix the
> > breakage at the point where it was introduced, not leave it broken
> > until the last patch in the series.
> > 
> 
> The build gets broken when patch 7/8 of is applied. That is the patch
> that finally allows platform.c to get built for host and gadget. I can
> fold this patch into patch 7/8.

then you invert things, make $subject patch 7 (or even patch 1) and
patch 7 becomes patch 8.

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]