From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 3/8] arm64: introduce is_device_dma_coherent
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 10:57:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141103105716.GC23162@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1411031045340.22875@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:46:03AM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Introduce a boolean flag and an accessor function to check whether a
> > device is dma_coherent. Set the flag from set_arch_dma_coherent_ops.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > CC: will.deacon at arm.com
>
> Will, Catalin,
> are you OK with this patch?
It would be nicer if the dma_coherent flag didn't have to be duplicated by
each architecture in dev_archdata. Is there any reason not to put it in the
core code?
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"konrad.wilk@oracle.com" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"Ian.Campbell@citrix.com" <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
"david.vrabel@citrix.com" <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/8] arm64: introduce is_device_dma_coherent
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 10:57:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141103105716.GC23162@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1411031045340.22875@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:46:03AM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Introduce a boolean flag and an accessor function to check whether a
> > device is dma_coherent. Set the flag from set_arch_dma_coherent_ops.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > CC: will.deacon@arm.com
>
> Will, Catalin,
> are you OK with this patch?
It would be nicer if the dma_coherent flag didn't have to be duplicated by
each architecture in dev_archdata. Is there any reason not to put it in the
core code?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-03 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-27 15:08 [PATCH v7 0/8] introduce GNTTABOP_cache_flush Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:08 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:08 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] xen/arm: remove handling of XENFEAT_grant_map_identity Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] xen/arm: remove outer_*_range call Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] arm64: introduce is_device_dma_coherent Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-03 10:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-03 10:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-03 10:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-03 10:57 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2014-11-03 10:57 ` Will Deacon
2014-11-03 11:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-03 11:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-04 11:35 ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-04 11:35 ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-11-04 15:00 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-04 15:00 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-05 16:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-05 16:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-05 18:15 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-05 18:15 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-06 10:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-06 10:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-06 12:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-06 12:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-06 13:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-06 13:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-07 11:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-07 11:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-07 11:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-07 11:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-07 14:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-07 14:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-07 14:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-07 14:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-07 16:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-07 16:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-07 17:24 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-07 17:24 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-07 17:35 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-07 17:35 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-07 18:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-07 18:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-07 18:45 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-07 18:45 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-10 10:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-10 10:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-10 12:35 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-10 12:35 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-10 12:41 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-10 12:41 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] arm: " Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-03 10:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-03 10:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-03 10:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] xen/arm: use is_device_dma_coherent Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] xen/arm/arm64: merge xen/mm32.c into xen/mm.c Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-07 14:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-07 14:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-07 15:28 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-07 15:28 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-07 16:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-07 16:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-07 16:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-07 16:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] xen/arm/arm64: introduce xen_arch_need_swiotlb Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-03 10:45 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-03 10:45 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-03 10:45 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-11-03 11:01 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-11-03 11:01 ` David Vrabel
2014-11-03 11:01 ` David Vrabel
2014-11-03 16:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-03 16:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-10-27 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] xen/arm: introduce GNTTABOP_cache_flush Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-10-27 15:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141103105716.GC23162@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.