From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 10/10] sched: make scale_rt invariant with frequency
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:51:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141103155129.GK12706@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414745252-4895-11-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 09:47:32AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The call to arch_scale_frequency_capacity in the rt scheduling path might be
> a concern for RT folks because I'm not sure whether we can rely on
> arch_scale_freq_capacity to be short and efficient ?
Well, you put it in quite a hot path on the CFS side too, so it had
better be blazing fast anyhow.
That said, can you move all the running + invariance bits at the
beginning of the patch set, these appear to be the least controversial
bits and 'desired' by quite a few people, so we'll try and get those
agreed upon and merged first.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com,
kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, riel@redhat.com,
efault@gmx.de, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] sched: make scale_rt invariant with frequency
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:51:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141103155129.GK12706@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414745252-4895-11-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 09:47:32AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The call to arch_scale_frequency_capacity in the rt scheduling path might be
> a concern for RT folks because I'm not sure whether we can rely on
> arch_scale_freq_capacity to be short and efficient ?
Well, you put it in quite a hot path on the CFS side too, so it had
better be blazing fast anyhow.
That said, can you move all the running + invariance bits at the
beginning of the patch set, these appear to be the least controversial
bits and 'desired' by quite a few people, so we'll try and get those
agreed upon and merged first.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-03 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-31 8:47 [PATCH v8 00/10] sched: consolidation of CPU capacity and usage Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] sched: add per rq cpu_capacity_orig Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] sched: remove frequency scaling from cpu_capacity Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher capacity Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-04 8:30 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-04 8:30 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-04 9:41 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-04 9:41 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-04 10:42 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-04 10:42 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-04 11:10 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-04 11:10 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-18 10:47 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-18 10:47 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-18 11:00 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-18 11:00 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` [PATCH v8 04/10] sched: add utilization_avg_contrib Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] sched: Track group sched_entity usage contributions Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] sched: get CPU's usage statistic Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] sched: replace capacity_factor by usage Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-03 7:01 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-03 7:01 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-03 10:59 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-03 10:59 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-03 15:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-03 15:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-31 8:47 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] sched: add SD_PREFER_SIBLING for SMT level Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-04 3:21 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-04 3:21 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-04 8:58 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-04 8:58 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] sched: Make sched entity usage tracking scale-invariant Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] sched: make scale_rt invariant with frequency Vincent Guittot
2014-10-31 8:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-03 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-11-03 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-03 16:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-03 16:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-03 2:12 ` [PATCH v8 00/10] sched: consolidation of CPU capacity and usage Wanpeng Li
2014-11-03 2:12 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-03 10:55 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-03 10:55 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-03 13:03 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-03 13:03 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141103155129.GK12706@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.