From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: mvebu: Let the device-tree determine smp_ops
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 21:03:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141106200339.GE4974@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <545BD0C2.6000408@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
> >> I'm working on a new board that uses a integrated CPU that according to the
> >> vendor is "based on the ARMADA-XP", more on that to come in the future
> >> hopefully.
> > A packet processor chip with an embedded CPU? Next generation
> > Prestera? No need to answer that if you don't want to.
> You guess correctly. Not sure how much I can say without falling foul of
> our NDA but they know I intend on trying to get this stuff upstream
> rather than being locked into their particular SDK.
Hi Chris
Nice to hear you want to upstream it. There are some interesting
chips, even in consumer level devices like the TPE-1620WS, which i
would love to play with. But the Switching part of Marvell don't seem
interested in the community, unlike the processors part of Marvell
which is engaging with the community.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-06 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-06 4:49 [RFC PATCH] ARM: mvebu: Let the device-tree determine smp_ops Chris Packham
2014-11-06 14:49 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-11-06 19:49 ` Chris Packham
2014-11-06 20:03 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2014-11-06 14:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-11-06 15:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-11-06 15:33 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-11-06 19:56 ` Chris Packham
2014-11-06 20:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-11-07 2:33 ` [RFC PATCHv2] " Chris Packham
2014-11-16 22:40 ` [RFC PATCHv3] " Chris Packham
2014-11-17 8:45 ` [RFC PATCHv2] " Thomas Petazzoni
2014-11-17 8:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-11-17 20:46 ` Chris Packham
2014-11-17 23:34 ` Chris Packham
2014-11-18 0:31 ` Chris Packham
2014-11-18 8:21 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-11-18 19:43 ` Chris Packham
2014-11-18 23:37 ` [RFC PATCHv4] ARM: mvebu: use dt_fixup to provide fallback for enable-method Chris Packham
2014-11-18 8:16 ` [RFC PATCHv2] ARM: mvebu: Let the device-tree determine smp_ops Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141106200339.GE4974@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.