From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: implement chage_attr_type attribute
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:54:00 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141113235400.GM28565@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHQdGtRvaOTT7375p0eDjPPm+uFc19AJkf-NWDAKq-=goqZSpA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 08:02:43AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:26:16AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:27:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> >> To clarify what Christoph wrote, XFS updates i_version is updated
> >> >> once per transaction that modifies the inode. So if a VFS level
> >> >> operation results in multiple transactions then each transaction
> >> >> will but the version.
> >> >>
> >> >> It was implemented that way because nobody could tell me what the
> >> >> actual granularity requirement for change detection was. Hence what
> >> >> I implemented was "be able to detect any persistent change that is
> >> >> made" to cover all bases.
FWIW, ext4 takes the same approach. See Ted's post today:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg46194.html
"The inode_inc_iversion() in mark4_ext4_iloc_dirty() is probably not
necessary, since we already should be incrementing i_version whenever
ctime and mtime gets updated. The inode_inc_iversion() there is more
of a "belt and suspenders" safety thing, on the theory that the extra
bump in i_version won't hurt anything."
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-13 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-08 12:11 nfsd: add support for the chage_attr_type attribute Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-08 12:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: correctly define v4.2 support attributes Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-10 22:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-11-11 10:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-08 12:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: implement chage_attr_type attribute Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-10 17:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-11-11 10:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-11 12:36 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-11-11 16:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-11 22:27 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-12 10:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-12 14:26 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-11-13 0:28 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-13 13:02 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-11-13 21:47 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-13 23:54 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-11-14 0:43 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-11-14 4:35 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-14 14:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-11-15 1:24 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-11 21:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-12-01 19:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-12-02 17:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-10 21:42 ` nfsd: add support for the " J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141113235400.GM28565@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.