From: Felipe Balbi <balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Keerthy <j-keerthy-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
LAK
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] mfd: palmas: Add support for optional wakeup
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:19:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141114161901.GG11538@saruman> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141113174030.GM26481-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10495 bytes --]
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 09:40:31AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
[snip]
> From: Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:53:55 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] genirq: Add support for wake-up interrupts to fix irq reentry issues in drivers
>
> As pointed out by Thomas Gleixner, at least omap wake-up interrupts
> have an issue with re-entrant interrupts because the wake-up interrupts
> are now handled as a secondary interrupt controller. Further, the
> wake-up interrupt just needs wake the system at least for omaps. So we
> should make the wake-up interrupt handling generic.
>
> Note that at least initially we are keeping things simple by assuming the
> wake-up interrupt is level sensitive, and the device pm_runtime_resume()
> can deal with the situation, and no replaying of the lost device interrupts
> is needed.
>
> After tinkering with replaying of the lost device interrupts, my opinion is
> that it should be avoided because of the issues listed in the comments of
> this patch.
>
> Let's also add a minimal manage.h to allow us keeping the separation
> of devm functions and without having to include internals.h in devres.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
>
> --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
> @@ -139,11 +139,15 @@ extern int __must_check
> request_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
> const char *devname, void __percpu *percpu_dev_id);
>
> +struct device;
> +
> +extern int __must_check
> +request_wake_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long irqflags);
> +
> extern void free_irq(unsigned int, void *);
> extern void free_percpu_irq(unsigned int, void __percpu *);
>
> -struct device;
> -
> extern int __must_check
> devm_request_threaded_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq,
> irq_handler_t handler, irq_handler_t thread_fn,
> @@ -163,6 +167,10 @@ devm_request_any_context_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq,
> irq_handler_t handler, unsigned long irqflags,
> const char *devname, void *dev_id);
>
> +extern int __must_check
> +devm_request_wake_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long irqflags);
> +
> extern void devm_free_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq, void *dev_id);
>
> /*
> --- a/kernel/irq/devres.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/devres.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
>
> +#include "manage.h"
> +
> /*
> * Device resource management aware IRQ request/free implementation.
> */
> @@ -118,6 +120,30 @@ int devm_request_any_context_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq,
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_request_any_context_irq);
>
> /**
> + * devm_request_wake_irq - request a wake-up interrupt for a device
> + * @dev: device to wake on the wake-up interrupt
> + * @wakeirq: wake-up interrupt for the device
> + * @wakeirq: wake-up interrupt flags
> + *
> + * The wake-up interrupt starts disabled and is typically enabled
> + * when needed by the device driver runtime PM calls.
> + */
> +int devm_request_wake_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long wakeflags)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = init_disabled_wakeirq(dev, wakeirq, wakeflags);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, wakeirq, NULL,
> + handle_wakeirq_thread,
> + wakeflags, dev_name(dev), dev);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_request_wake_irq);
> +
> +/**
> * devm_free_irq - free an interrupt
> * @dev: device to free interrupt for
> * @irq: Interrupt line to free
> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> @@ -14,12 +14,14 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/random.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/sched/rt.h>
> #include <linux/task_work.h>
>
> #include "internals.h"
> +#include "manage.h"
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
> __read_mostly bool force_irqthreads;
> @@ -1564,6 +1566,112 @@ int request_any_context_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(request_any_context_irq);
>
> +/**
> + * handle_wakeirq_thread - call device runtime pm calls on wake-up interrupt
> + * @wakeirq: device specific wake-up interrupt
> + * @dev_id: struct device entry
> + */
> +irqreturn_t handle_wakeirq_thread(int wakeirq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = dev_id;
> + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) {
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> + pm_request_resume(dev);
this assumes that every driver's ->resume() callback has a:
if (pending)
handle_pending_irqs();
which might not be very nice. I'd rather follow what Thomas suggested
and always pass device irq so this can mark it pending. Keep in mind
that we *don't* need a pm_runtime_get_sync() in every IRQ handler
because of that. Adding it is but the easiest way to get things working
and, quite frankly, very silly.
what we want is rather:
irqreturn_t my_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct device *dev = dev_id;
if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) {
pending_irqs_to_be_handled_from_runtime_resume = true;
pm_runtime_get(dev);
clear_irq_source(dev);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
}
or something similar.
> + ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> + }
you're not masking the wake irq here which means that when this handler
returns, wake irq will be unmasked by core IRQ subsystem leaving it
unmasked after ->resume().
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * init_disabled_wakeirq - initialize a wake-up interrupt for a device
> + * @dev: device to wake up on the wake-up interrupt
> + * @wakeirq: wake-up interrupt for the device
> + * @wakeflags: wake-up interrupt flags
> + *
> + * Note that the wake-up interrupt starts disabled. The wake-up interrupt
> + * is typically enabled from the device pm_runtime_suspend() and disabled
> + * again in the device pm_runtime_resume(). For runtime PM, the wake-up
> + * interrupt should be always enabled, and for device suspend and resume,
> + * the wake-up interrupt should be enabled depending on the device specific
> + * configuration for device_can_wakeup().
> + *
> + * Note also that we are not resending the lost device interrupts.
> + * We assume that the wake-up interrupt just needs to wake-up the device,
> + * and then device pm_runtime_resume() can deal with the situation.
> + *
> + * There are at least the following reasons to not resend the lost device
> + * interrupts automatically based on the wake-up interrupt:
> + *
> + * 1. There can be interrupt reentry issues calling the device interrupt
> + * based on the wake-up interrupt if done in the device driver. It
> + * could be done with check_irq_resend() after checking the device
> + * interrupt mask if we really wanted to though.
> + *
> + * 2. The device interrupt handler would need to be set up properly with
> + * pm_runtime_irq_safe(). Ideally you don't want to call pm_runtime
> + * calls from the device interrupt handler at all.
> + *
> + * 3. The IRQ subsystem may not know if it's safe to call the device
> + * interrupt unless the driver updates the interrupt status with
> + * disable_irq() and enable_irq() in addition to just disabling the
> + * interrupt at the hardware level in the device registers.
> + *
> + * So if replaying the lost device interrupts is absolutely needed from the
> + * hardware point of view, it's probably best to set up a completely
> + * separate wake-up interrupt handler for the wake-up interrupt in the
> + * device driver because of the reasons above.
> + */
> +int init_disabled_wakeirq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long wakeflags)
> +{
> + if (!(dev && wakeirq)) {
> + pr_err("Missing device or wakeirq for %s irq %d\n",
> + dev_name(dev), wakeirq);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (!(wakeflags & IRQF_ONESHOT)) {
> + pr_err("Invalid wakeirq for %s irq %d, must be oneshot\n",
> + dev_name(dev), wakeirq);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
you *know* you'll pass a NULL top half handler, why don't you just force
IRQF_ONESHOT instead of erroring out ? Just add:
wakeflags |= IRQF_ONESHOT;
and get it over with :-)
> + if (wakeflags & (IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING))
> + pr_warn("Not replaying device IRQs for %s on wakeirq%d\n",
> + dev_name(dev), wakeirq);
> +
> + irq_set_status_flags(wakeirq, _IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * request_wake_irq - request a wake-up interrupt for a device
> + * @dev: device to wake on the wake-up interrupt
> + * @wakeirq: wake-up interrupt for the device
> + * @wakeirq: wake-up interrupt flags
> + *
> + * The wake-up interrupt starts disabled and is typically enabled
> + * when needed by the device driver runtime PM calls.
> + */
> +int request_wake_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long wakeflags)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = init_disabled_wakeirq(dev, wakeirq, wakeflags);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return request_threaded_irq(wakeirq, NULL,
> + handle_wakeirq_thread,
> + wakeflags, dev_name(dev), dev);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(request_wake_irq);
> +
> void enable_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type)
> {
> unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +/*
> + * IRQ subsystem internal management functions and variables:
> + *
> + * Do not ever include this file from anything else than
> + * kernel/irq/. Do not even think about using any information outside
> + * of this file for your non core code.
> + */
> +
> +irqreturn_t handle_wakeirq_thread(int wakeirq, void *dev_id);
> +int init_disabled_wakeirq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long wakeflags);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 3/3] mfd: palmas: Add support for optional wakeup
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:19:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141114161901.GG11538@saruman> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141113174030.GM26481@atomide.com>
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 09:40:31AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
[snip]
> From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:53:55 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] genirq: Add support for wake-up interrupts to fix irq reentry issues in drivers
>
> As pointed out by Thomas Gleixner, at least omap wake-up interrupts
> have an issue with re-entrant interrupts because the wake-up interrupts
> are now handled as a secondary interrupt controller. Further, the
> wake-up interrupt just needs wake the system at least for omaps. So we
> should make the wake-up interrupt handling generic.
>
> Note that at least initially we are keeping things simple by assuming the
> wake-up interrupt is level sensitive, and the device pm_runtime_resume()
> can deal with the situation, and no replaying of the lost device interrupts
> is needed.
>
> After tinkering with replaying of the lost device interrupts, my opinion is
> that it should be avoided because of the issues listed in the comments of
> this patch.
>
> Let's also add a minimal manage.h to allow us keeping the separation
> of devm functions and without having to include internals.h in devres.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>
> --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
> @@ -139,11 +139,15 @@ extern int __must_check
> request_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
> const char *devname, void __percpu *percpu_dev_id);
>
> +struct device;
> +
> +extern int __must_check
> +request_wake_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long irqflags);
> +
> extern void free_irq(unsigned int, void *);
> extern void free_percpu_irq(unsigned int, void __percpu *);
>
> -struct device;
> -
> extern int __must_check
> devm_request_threaded_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq,
> irq_handler_t handler, irq_handler_t thread_fn,
> @@ -163,6 +167,10 @@ devm_request_any_context_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq,
> irq_handler_t handler, unsigned long irqflags,
> const char *devname, void *dev_id);
>
> +extern int __must_check
> +devm_request_wake_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long irqflags);
> +
> extern void devm_free_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq, void *dev_id);
>
> /*
> --- a/kernel/irq/devres.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/devres.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
>
> +#include "manage.h"
> +
> /*
> * Device resource management aware IRQ request/free implementation.
> */
> @@ -118,6 +120,30 @@ int devm_request_any_context_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq,
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_request_any_context_irq);
>
> /**
> + * devm_request_wake_irq - request a wake-up interrupt for a device
> + * @dev: device to wake on the wake-up interrupt
> + * @wakeirq: wake-up interrupt for the device
> + * @wakeirq: wake-up interrupt flags
> + *
> + * The wake-up interrupt starts disabled and is typically enabled
> + * when needed by the device driver runtime PM calls.
> + */
> +int devm_request_wake_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long wakeflags)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = init_disabled_wakeirq(dev, wakeirq, wakeflags);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, wakeirq, NULL,
> + handle_wakeirq_thread,
> + wakeflags, dev_name(dev), dev);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_request_wake_irq);
> +
> +/**
> * devm_free_irq - free an interrupt
> * @dev: device to free interrupt for
> * @irq: Interrupt line to free
> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> @@ -14,12 +14,14 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/random.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/sched/rt.h>
> #include <linux/task_work.h>
>
> #include "internals.h"
> +#include "manage.h"
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
> __read_mostly bool force_irqthreads;
> @@ -1564,6 +1566,112 @@ int request_any_context_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(request_any_context_irq);
>
> +/**
> + * handle_wakeirq_thread - call device runtime pm calls on wake-up interrupt
> + * @wakeirq: device specific wake-up interrupt
> + * @dev_id: struct device entry
> + */
> +irqreturn_t handle_wakeirq_thread(int wakeirq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = dev_id;
> + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) {
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> + pm_request_resume(dev);
this assumes that every driver's ->resume() callback has a:
if (pending)
handle_pending_irqs();
which might not be very nice. I'd rather follow what Thomas suggested
and always pass device irq so this can mark it pending. Keep in mind
that we *don't* need a pm_runtime_get_sync() in every IRQ handler
because of that. Adding it is but the easiest way to get things working
and, quite frankly, very silly.
what we want is rather:
irqreturn_t my_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct device *dev = dev_id;
if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) {
pending_irqs_to_be_handled_from_runtime_resume = true;
pm_runtime_get(dev);
clear_irq_source(dev);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
}
or something similar.
> + ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> + }
you're not masking the wake irq here which means that when this handler
returns, wake irq will be unmasked by core IRQ subsystem leaving it
unmasked after ->resume().
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * init_disabled_wakeirq - initialize a wake-up interrupt for a device
> + * @dev: device to wake up on the wake-up interrupt
> + * @wakeirq: wake-up interrupt for the device
> + * @wakeflags: wake-up interrupt flags
> + *
> + * Note that the wake-up interrupt starts disabled. The wake-up interrupt
> + * is typically enabled from the device pm_runtime_suspend() and disabled
> + * again in the device pm_runtime_resume(). For runtime PM, the wake-up
> + * interrupt should be always enabled, and for device suspend and resume,
> + * the wake-up interrupt should be enabled depending on the device specific
> + * configuration for device_can_wakeup().
> + *
> + * Note also that we are not resending the lost device interrupts.
> + * We assume that the wake-up interrupt just needs to wake-up the device,
> + * and then device pm_runtime_resume() can deal with the situation.
> + *
> + * There are at least the following reasons to not resend the lost device
> + * interrupts automatically based on the wake-up interrupt:
> + *
> + * 1. There can be interrupt reentry issues calling the device interrupt
> + * based on the wake-up interrupt if done in the device driver. It
> + * could be done with check_irq_resend() after checking the device
> + * interrupt mask if we really wanted to though.
> + *
> + * 2. The device interrupt handler would need to be set up properly with
> + * pm_runtime_irq_safe(). Ideally you don't want to call pm_runtime
> + * calls from the device interrupt handler at all.
> + *
> + * 3. The IRQ subsystem may not know if it's safe to call the device
> + * interrupt unless the driver updates the interrupt status with
> + * disable_irq() and enable_irq() in addition to just disabling the
> + * interrupt at the hardware level in the device registers.
> + *
> + * So if replaying the lost device interrupts is absolutely needed from the
> + * hardware point of view, it's probably best to set up a completely
> + * separate wake-up interrupt handler for the wake-up interrupt in the
> + * device driver because of the reasons above.
> + */
> +int init_disabled_wakeirq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long wakeflags)
> +{
> + if (!(dev && wakeirq)) {
> + pr_err("Missing device or wakeirq for %s irq %d\n",
> + dev_name(dev), wakeirq);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (!(wakeflags & IRQF_ONESHOT)) {
> + pr_err("Invalid wakeirq for %s irq %d, must be oneshot\n",
> + dev_name(dev), wakeirq);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
you *know* you'll pass a NULL top half handler, why don't you just force
IRQF_ONESHOT instead of erroring out ? Just add:
wakeflags |= IRQF_ONESHOT;
and get it over with :-)
> + if (wakeflags & (IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING))
> + pr_warn("Not replaying device IRQs for %s on wakeirq%d\n",
> + dev_name(dev), wakeirq);
> +
> + irq_set_status_flags(wakeirq, _IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * request_wake_irq - request a wake-up interrupt for a device
> + * @dev: device to wake on the wake-up interrupt
> + * @wakeirq: wake-up interrupt for the device
> + * @wakeirq: wake-up interrupt flags
> + *
> + * The wake-up interrupt starts disabled and is typically enabled
> + * when needed by the device driver runtime PM calls.
> + */
> +int request_wake_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long wakeflags)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = init_disabled_wakeirq(dev, wakeirq, wakeflags);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return request_threaded_irq(wakeirq, NULL,
> + handle_wakeirq_thread,
> + wakeflags, dev_name(dev), dev);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(request_wake_irq);
> +
> void enable_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type)
> {
> unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +/*
> + * IRQ subsystem internal management functions and variables:
> + *
> + * Do not ever include this file from anything else than
> + * kernel/irq/. Do not even think about using any information outside
> + * of this file for your non core code.
> + */
> +
> +irqreturn_t handle_wakeirq_thread(int wakeirq, void *dev_id);
> +int init_disabled_wakeirq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long wakeflags);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141114/087ef6f7/attachment-0001.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
<lee.jones@linaro.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] mfd: palmas: Add support for optional wakeup
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:19:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141114161901.GG11538@saruman> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141113174030.GM26481@atomide.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10415 bytes --]
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 09:40:31AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
[snip]
> From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:53:55 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] genirq: Add support for wake-up interrupts to fix irq reentry issues in drivers
>
> As pointed out by Thomas Gleixner, at least omap wake-up interrupts
> have an issue with re-entrant interrupts because the wake-up interrupts
> are now handled as a secondary interrupt controller. Further, the
> wake-up interrupt just needs wake the system at least for omaps. So we
> should make the wake-up interrupt handling generic.
>
> Note that at least initially we are keeping things simple by assuming the
> wake-up interrupt is level sensitive, and the device pm_runtime_resume()
> can deal with the situation, and no replaying of the lost device interrupts
> is needed.
>
> After tinkering with replaying of the lost device interrupts, my opinion is
> that it should be avoided because of the issues listed in the comments of
> this patch.
>
> Let's also add a minimal manage.h to allow us keeping the separation
> of devm functions and without having to include internals.h in devres.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>
> --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
> @@ -139,11 +139,15 @@ extern int __must_check
> request_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
> const char *devname, void __percpu *percpu_dev_id);
>
> +struct device;
> +
> +extern int __must_check
> +request_wake_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long irqflags);
> +
> extern void free_irq(unsigned int, void *);
> extern void free_percpu_irq(unsigned int, void __percpu *);
>
> -struct device;
> -
> extern int __must_check
> devm_request_threaded_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq,
> irq_handler_t handler, irq_handler_t thread_fn,
> @@ -163,6 +167,10 @@ devm_request_any_context_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq,
> irq_handler_t handler, unsigned long irqflags,
> const char *devname, void *dev_id);
>
> +extern int __must_check
> +devm_request_wake_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long irqflags);
> +
> extern void devm_free_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq, void *dev_id);
>
> /*
> --- a/kernel/irq/devres.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/devres.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
>
> +#include "manage.h"
> +
> /*
> * Device resource management aware IRQ request/free implementation.
> */
> @@ -118,6 +120,30 @@ int devm_request_any_context_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq,
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_request_any_context_irq);
>
> /**
> + * devm_request_wake_irq - request a wake-up interrupt for a device
> + * @dev: device to wake on the wake-up interrupt
> + * @wakeirq: wake-up interrupt for the device
> + * @wakeirq: wake-up interrupt flags
> + *
> + * The wake-up interrupt starts disabled and is typically enabled
> + * when needed by the device driver runtime PM calls.
> + */
> +int devm_request_wake_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long wakeflags)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = init_disabled_wakeirq(dev, wakeirq, wakeflags);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, wakeirq, NULL,
> + handle_wakeirq_thread,
> + wakeflags, dev_name(dev), dev);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_request_wake_irq);
> +
> +/**
> * devm_free_irq - free an interrupt
> * @dev: device to free interrupt for
> * @irq: Interrupt line to free
> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> @@ -14,12 +14,14 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/random.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/sched/rt.h>
> #include <linux/task_work.h>
>
> #include "internals.h"
> +#include "manage.h"
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
> __read_mostly bool force_irqthreads;
> @@ -1564,6 +1566,112 @@ int request_any_context_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(request_any_context_irq);
>
> +/**
> + * handle_wakeirq_thread - call device runtime pm calls on wake-up interrupt
> + * @wakeirq: device specific wake-up interrupt
> + * @dev_id: struct device entry
> + */
> +irqreturn_t handle_wakeirq_thread(int wakeirq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = dev_id;
> + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) {
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> + pm_request_resume(dev);
this assumes that every driver's ->resume() callback has a:
if (pending)
handle_pending_irqs();
which might not be very nice. I'd rather follow what Thomas suggested
and always pass device irq so this can mark it pending. Keep in mind
that we *don't* need a pm_runtime_get_sync() in every IRQ handler
because of that. Adding it is but the easiest way to get things working
and, quite frankly, very silly.
what we want is rather:
irqreturn_t my_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct device *dev = dev_id;
if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) {
pending_irqs_to_be_handled_from_runtime_resume = true;
pm_runtime_get(dev);
clear_irq_source(dev);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
}
or something similar.
> + ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> + }
you're not masking the wake irq here which means that when this handler
returns, wake irq will be unmasked by core IRQ subsystem leaving it
unmasked after ->resume().
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * init_disabled_wakeirq - initialize a wake-up interrupt for a device
> + * @dev: device to wake up on the wake-up interrupt
> + * @wakeirq: wake-up interrupt for the device
> + * @wakeflags: wake-up interrupt flags
> + *
> + * Note that the wake-up interrupt starts disabled. The wake-up interrupt
> + * is typically enabled from the device pm_runtime_suspend() and disabled
> + * again in the device pm_runtime_resume(). For runtime PM, the wake-up
> + * interrupt should be always enabled, and for device suspend and resume,
> + * the wake-up interrupt should be enabled depending on the device specific
> + * configuration for device_can_wakeup().
> + *
> + * Note also that we are not resending the lost device interrupts.
> + * We assume that the wake-up interrupt just needs to wake-up the device,
> + * and then device pm_runtime_resume() can deal with the situation.
> + *
> + * There are at least the following reasons to not resend the lost device
> + * interrupts automatically based on the wake-up interrupt:
> + *
> + * 1. There can be interrupt reentry issues calling the device interrupt
> + * based on the wake-up interrupt if done in the device driver. It
> + * could be done with check_irq_resend() after checking the device
> + * interrupt mask if we really wanted to though.
> + *
> + * 2. The device interrupt handler would need to be set up properly with
> + * pm_runtime_irq_safe(). Ideally you don't want to call pm_runtime
> + * calls from the device interrupt handler at all.
> + *
> + * 3. The IRQ subsystem may not know if it's safe to call the device
> + * interrupt unless the driver updates the interrupt status with
> + * disable_irq() and enable_irq() in addition to just disabling the
> + * interrupt at the hardware level in the device registers.
> + *
> + * So if replaying the lost device interrupts is absolutely needed from the
> + * hardware point of view, it's probably best to set up a completely
> + * separate wake-up interrupt handler for the wake-up interrupt in the
> + * device driver because of the reasons above.
> + */
> +int init_disabled_wakeirq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long wakeflags)
> +{
> + if (!(dev && wakeirq)) {
> + pr_err("Missing device or wakeirq for %s irq %d\n",
> + dev_name(dev), wakeirq);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (!(wakeflags & IRQF_ONESHOT)) {
> + pr_err("Invalid wakeirq for %s irq %d, must be oneshot\n",
> + dev_name(dev), wakeirq);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
you *know* you'll pass a NULL top half handler, why don't you just force
IRQF_ONESHOT instead of erroring out ? Just add:
wakeflags |= IRQF_ONESHOT;
and get it over with :-)
> + if (wakeflags & (IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING))
> + pr_warn("Not replaying device IRQs for %s on wakeirq%d\n",
> + dev_name(dev), wakeirq);
> +
> + irq_set_status_flags(wakeirq, _IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * request_wake_irq - request a wake-up interrupt for a device
> + * @dev: device to wake on the wake-up interrupt
> + * @wakeirq: wake-up interrupt for the device
> + * @wakeirq: wake-up interrupt flags
> + *
> + * The wake-up interrupt starts disabled and is typically enabled
> + * when needed by the device driver runtime PM calls.
> + */
> +int request_wake_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long wakeflags)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = init_disabled_wakeirq(dev, wakeirq, wakeflags);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return request_threaded_irq(wakeirq, NULL,
> + handle_wakeirq_thread,
> + wakeflags, dev_name(dev), dev);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(request_wake_irq);
> +
> void enable_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type)
> {
> unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +/*
> + * IRQ subsystem internal management functions and variables:
> + *
> + * Do not ever include this file from anything else than
> + * kernel/irq/. Do not even think about using any information outside
> + * of this file for your non core code.
> + */
> +
> +irqreturn_t handle_wakeirq_thread(int wakeirq, void *dev_id);
> +int init_disabled_wakeirq(struct device *dev, unsigned int wakeirq,
> + unsigned long wakeflags);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-14 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-18 19:04 [PATCH V3 0/3] mfd: palmas: add optional wakeup irq Nishanth Menon
2014-09-18 19:04 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-09-18 19:04 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-09-18 19:04 ` [PATCH V3 1/3] Documentation: dt-bindings: mfd: palmas: Fix example style of i2c peripheral Nishanth Menon
2014-09-18 19:04 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-09-18 19:04 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-09-18 19:04 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] Documentation: dt-bindings: mfd: palmas: document optional wakeup IRQ Nishanth Menon
2014-09-18 19:04 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-09-18 19:04 ` Nishanth Menon
[not found] ` <1411067086-16613-1-git-send-email-nm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-18 19:04 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] mfd: palmas: Add support for optional wakeup Nishanth Menon
2014-09-18 19:04 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-09-18 19:04 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-09-19 0:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-19 0:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-19 3:03 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-09-19 3:03 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-09-19 3:03 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-09-19 15:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-19 15:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-19 15:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-19 16:19 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-09-19 16:19 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-09-19 16:19 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-09-19 17:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-19 17:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-19 17:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-19 19:16 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-09-19 19:16 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-09-19 19:16 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <20140919191649.GQ14505-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-19 19:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-19 19:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-19 19:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-19 19:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-09-19 19:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-09-19 19:57 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <20140919195738.GR14505-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-20 2:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-20 2:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-20 2:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-20 14:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-09-20 14:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-09-20 14:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-10-02 3:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-10-02 3:43 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <20141002034345.GH3122-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-06 20:46 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-06 20:46 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-06 20:46 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <20141106204629.GF31454-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-13 10:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-13 10:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-13 10:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-13 17:40 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-13 17:40 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <20141113174030.GM26481-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-13 22:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-13 22:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-13 22:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-13 23:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-13 23:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-13 23:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-14 16:19 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2014-11-14 16:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-11-14 16:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-11-14 17:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-14 17:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-14 17:08 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <20141114170816.GW26481-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-14 17:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-11-14 17:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-11-14 17:21 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141114161901.GG11538@saruman \
--to=balbi-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=j-keerthy-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khilman-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.