All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: rockchip: add bindings for the mmc clock phases
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:39:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141117193902.25314.97687@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1416009604-31545-2-git-send-email-amstan@chromium.org>

Quoting Alexandru M Stan (2014-11-14 16:00:03)
> This will be used in a later patch for clock phase tuning.
> 
> Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru M Stan <amstan@chromium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2: None
> 
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h
> index 100a08c..465d0f6 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,16 @@
>  #define SCLK_HEVC_CABAC                111
>  #define SCLK_HEVC_CORE         112
>  
> +#define SCLK_SDMMC_DRV_PHASE   113
> +#define SCLK_SDIO0_DRV_PHASE   114
> +#define SCLK_SDIO1_DRV_PHASE   115
> +#define SCLK_EMMC_DRV_PHASE    116
> +
> +#define SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE_PHASE        117
> +#define SCLK_SDIO0_SAMPLE_PHASE        118
> +#define SCLK_SDIO1_SAMPLE_PHASE        119
> +#define SCLK_EMMC_SAMPLE_PHASE 120

It looks like you are adding new clocks to handle the phase requirement.
Is that the right thing to do? Don't these clks already exist (e.g.
SCLK_SDMMC)?

Regards,
Mike

> +
>  #define DCLK_VOP0              190
>  #define DCLK_VOP1              191
>  
> -- 
> 2.1.0.rc2.206.gedb03e5
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Turquette <mturquette-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	addy ke <addy.ke-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	Kever Yang <kever.yang-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Alexandru M Stan <amstan-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org,
	galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
	mark.yao-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: rockchip: add bindings for the mmc clock phases
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:39:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141117193902.25314.97687@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1416009604-31545-2-git-send-email-amstan-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>

Quoting Alexandru M Stan (2014-11-14 16:00:03)
> This will be used in a later patch for clock phase tuning.
> 
> Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru M Stan <amstan-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2: None
> 
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h
> index 100a08c..465d0f6 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,16 @@
>  #define SCLK_HEVC_CABAC                111
>  #define SCLK_HEVC_CORE         112
>  
> +#define SCLK_SDMMC_DRV_PHASE   113
> +#define SCLK_SDIO0_DRV_PHASE   114
> +#define SCLK_SDIO1_DRV_PHASE   115
> +#define SCLK_EMMC_DRV_PHASE    116
> +
> +#define SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE_PHASE        117
> +#define SCLK_SDIO0_SAMPLE_PHASE        118
> +#define SCLK_SDIO1_SAMPLE_PHASE        119
> +#define SCLK_EMMC_SAMPLE_PHASE 120

It looks like you are adding new clocks to handle the phase requirement.
Is that the right thing to do? Don't these clks already exist (e.g.
SCLK_SDMMC)?

Regards,
Mike

> +
>  #define DCLK_VOP0              190
>  #define DCLK_VOP1              191
>  
> -- 
> 2.1.0.rc2.206.gedb03e5
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
To: Alexandru M Stan <amstan@chromium.org>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Doug Anderson" <dianders@chromium.org>,
	"addy ke" <addy.ke@rock-chips.com>
Cc: "Sonny Rao" <sonnyrao@chromium.org>,
	"Kever Yang" <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	"Alexandru M Stan" <amstan@chromium.org>,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
	mark.yao@rock-chips.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: rockchip: add bindings for the mmc clock phases
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:39:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141117193902.25314.97687@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1416009604-31545-2-git-send-email-amstan@chromium.org>

Quoting Alexandru M Stan (2014-11-14 16:00:03)
> This will be used in a later patch for clock phase tuning.
> 
> Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru M Stan <amstan@chromium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2: None
> 
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h
> index 100a08c..465d0f6 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3288-cru.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,16 @@
>  #define SCLK_HEVC_CABAC                111
>  #define SCLK_HEVC_CORE         112
>  
> +#define SCLK_SDMMC_DRV_PHASE   113
> +#define SCLK_SDIO0_DRV_PHASE   114
> +#define SCLK_SDIO1_DRV_PHASE   115
> +#define SCLK_EMMC_DRV_PHASE    116
> +
> +#define SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE_PHASE        117
> +#define SCLK_SDIO0_SAMPLE_PHASE        118
> +#define SCLK_SDIO1_SAMPLE_PHASE        119
> +#define SCLK_EMMC_SAMPLE_PHASE 120

It looks like you are adding new clocks to handle the phase requirement.
Is that the right thing to do? Don't these clks already exist (e.g.
SCLK_SDMMC)?

Regards,
Mike

> +
>  #define DCLK_VOP0              190
>  #define DCLK_VOP1              191
>  
> -- 
> 2.1.0.rc2.206.gedb03e5
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-17 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-15  0:00 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for the rockchip mmc clock phases using the framework Alexandru M Stan
2014-11-15  0:00 ` Alexandru M Stan
2014-11-15  0:00 ` Alexandru M Stan
2014-11-15  0:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: rockchip: add bindings for the mmc clock phases Alexandru M Stan
2014-11-15  0:00   ` Alexandru M Stan
2014-11-17 19:39   ` Mike Turquette [this message]
2014-11-17 19:39     ` Mike Turquette
2014-11-17 19:39     ` Mike Turquette
2014-11-17 19:47     ` Alexandru Stan
2014-11-17 19:50     ` Alexandru Stan
2014-11-17 19:50       ` Alexandru Stan
2014-11-17 19:50       ` Alexandru Stan
2014-11-17 21:16       ` Mike Turquette
2014-11-17 21:16         ` Mike Turquette
2014-11-15  0:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: rockchip: Add support for the mmc clock phases using the framework Alexandru M Stan
2014-11-15  0:00   ` Alexandru M Stan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141117193902.25314.97687@quantum \
    --to=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.