All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>,
	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zsmalloc: correct fragile [kmap|kunmap]_atomic use
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:21:39 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141118232139.GA7393@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141118150138.668c81fda55c3ce39d7b2aac@linux-foundation.org>

Hello Andrew,

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 03:01:38PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:07:32 -0600 Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:11:01AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > The kunmap_atomic should use virtual address getting by kmap_atomic.
> > > However, some pieces of code in zsmalloc uses modified address,
> > > not the one got by kmap_atomic for kunmap_atomic.
> > > 
> > > It's okay for working because zsmalloc modifies the address
> > > inner PAGE_SIZE bounday so it works with current kmap_atomic's
> > > implementation. But it's still fragile with potential changing
> > > of kmap_atomic so let's correct it.
> 
> It is a bit alarming, but I've seen code elsewhere in which a modified
> pointer is passed to kunmap_atomic().  So the kunmap_atomic() interface
> is "kvaddr should point somewhere into the page" and that won't be
> changing without a big effort.
> 
> > Seems like you could just use PAGE_MASK to get the base page address
> > from link like this:
> 
> I think Minchan's approach is better: it explicitly retains the
> kmap_atomic() return value for passing to kunmap_atomic().  That's
> nicer than modifying it and then setting it back again.
> 
> I mean, a cleaner way of implementing your suggestion would be
> 
> void kunmap_atomic_unaligned(void *p)
> {
> 	kunmap_atomic(void *)((unsigned long)p & PAGE_MASK);
> }
> 
> but then one looks at
> 
> void __kunmap_atomic(void *kvaddr)
> {
> 	unsigned long vaddr = (unsigned long) kvaddr & PAGE_MASK;
> 
> and asks "what the heck".
> 
> 
> So I dunno.  We could leave the code as-is.  I have no strong feelings
> either way.  Minchan's patch has no effect on zsmalloc.o section sizes
> with my compiler.

I hope to merge my patch.

Main reason I sent the patch is I got a subtle bug when I implement
new feature of zsmalloc(ie, compaction) due to link's mishandling
(ie, link was over page boundary by my fault).
Although it was totally my mistake, it took time for a while
to find a root cause because unpredictable kmapped address should
be unmapped so it's almost random crash.

IOW, it's fragile to depend on kunmap_atomic's internal and at least,
I wanted to make zram code more robust.

Thanks.

> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>,
	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zsmalloc: correct fragile [kmap|kunmap]_atomic use
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:21:39 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141118232139.GA7393@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141118150138.668c81fda55c3ce39d7b2aac@linux-foundation.org>

Hello Andrew,

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 03:01:38PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:07:32 -0600 Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:11:01AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > The kunmap_atomic should use virtual address getting by kmap_atomic.
> > > However, some pieces of code in zsmalloc uses modified address,
> > > not the one got by kmap_atomic for kunmap_atomic.
> > > 
> > > It's okay for working because zsmalloc modifies the address
> > > inner PAGE_SIZE bounday so it works with current kmap_atomic's
> > > implementation. But it's still fragile with potential changing
> > > of kmap_atomic so let's correct it.
> 
> It is a bit alarming, but I've seen code elsewhere in which a modified
> pointer is passed to kunmap_atomic().  So the kunmap_atomic() interface
> is "kvaddr should point somewhere into the page" and that won't be
> changing without a big effort.
> 
> > Seems like you could just use PAGE_MASK to get the base page address
> > from link like this:
> 
> I think Minchan's approach is better: it explicitly retains the
> kmap_atomic() return value for passing to kunmap_atomic().  That's
> nicer than modifying it and then setting it back again.
> 
> I mean, a cleaner way of implementing your suggestion would be
> 
> void kunmap_atomic_unaligned(void *p)
> {
> 	kunmap_atomic(void *)((unsigned long)p & PAGE_MASK);
> }
> 
> but then one looks at
> 
> void __kunmap_atomic(void *kvaddr)
> {
> 	unsigned long vaddr = (unsigned long) kvaddr & PAGE_MASK;
> 
> and asks "what the heck".
> 
> 
> So I dunno.  We could leave the code as-is.  I have no strong feelings
> either way.  Minchan's patch has no effect on zsmalloc.o section sizes
> with my compiler.

I hope to merge my patch.

Main reason I sent the patch is I got a subtle bug when I implement
new feature of zsmalloc(ie, compaction) due to link's mishandling
(ie, link was over page boundary by my fault).
Although it was totally my mistake, it took time for a while
to find a root cause because unpredictable kmapped address should
be unmapped so it's almost random crash.

IOW, it's fragile to depend on kunmap_atomic's internal and at least,
I wanted to make zram code more robust.

Thanks.

> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-18 23:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-14  1:11 [PATCH] zsmalloc: correct fragile [kmap|kunmap]_atomic use Minchan Kim
2014-11-14  1:11 ` Minchan Kim
2014-11-14 15:07 ` Seth Jennings
2014-11-14 15:07   ` Seth Jennings
2014-11-15 13:20   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-11-15 13:20     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-11-18 23:01   ` Andrew Morton
2014-11-18 23:01     ` Andrew Morton
2014-11-18 23:21     ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2014-11-18 23:21       ` Minchan Kim
2014-11-18 23:34       ` Andrew Morton
2014-11-18 23:34         ` Andrew Morton
2014-11-16 11:41 ` Ganesh Mahendran
2014-11-16 11:41   ` Ganesh Mahendran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141118232139.GA7393@bbox \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ddstreet@ieee.org \
    --cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=sjennings@variantweb.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.