All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/11] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91rm9200
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:12:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141127171243.GL4508@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3550407.q87bWB4Jdt@wuerfel>

On 27/11/2014 at 17:49:50 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> On Thursday 27 November 2014 17:06:28 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > This is the last series of patches that removes the non-Device-Tree board
> > support for older Atmel SoCs.
> > Again, for the record, it was announced here
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/10/293 ([ANNOUNCE] ARM: at91: removal of board
> > files) two months ago.
> > Several files beyond at91rm9200 are touched this time as I tried to remove the
> > biggest parts that were related to !DT SoC initializations. More cleanup is
> > certainly needed to remove dead code.
> > 
> > The diffstat is also pretty big as a lot of at91rm9200 boards were remaining.
> > 
> 
> Awesome stuff!
> 
> Two questions:
> 
> - is anything holding this up from getting merged in 3.19?
> 

If you think this is not too late in the cycle, I would say go ahead ;)

> - Are there any remaining issues that keep us from using multiplatform?
>   I know you all have been working on those a lot, but I haven't
>   checked what is still missing.
> 

As discussed some weeks ago, I prepared patches to switch sama5d[3-4] to
multiplatform. We are still missing the SMC and matrix drivers to switch
sam9 and rm9200.

The currently affected drivers are:
 - drivers/ata/pata_at91.c (SMC)
 - drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c (SMC)
 - drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c (Matrix, this is the only one
   for sam9)
 - sound/atmel/ac97c.c (that one is still not converted to DT anyway...)
 - drivers/watchdog/at91rm9200_wdt.c (WIP, will be converted properly to
   an MFD)

I'll resume working on that in December.

Do you want me to submit the sama5d[3-4] switch for 3.19? I'll have to
rebase on that series. The main remaining issue is that I couldn't work
out a way not breaking the defconfigs, even after talking with the
Kconfig maintainer so doing first sama5 then sam9/rm9200 will break the
defconfigs for sam9/rm9200 twice.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91rm9200
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:12:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141127171243.GL4508@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3550407.q87bWB4Jdt@wuerfel>

On 27/11/2014 at 17:49:50 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> On Thursday 27 November 2014 17:06:28 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > This is the last series of patches that removes the non-Device-Tree board
> > support for older Atmel SoCs.
> > Again, for the record, it was announced here
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/10/293 ([ANNOUNCE] ARM: at91: removal of board
> > files) two months ago.
> > Several files beyond at91rm9200 are touched this time as I tried to remove the
> > biggest parts that were related to !DT SoC initializations. More cleanup is
> > certainly needed to remove dead code.
> > 
> > The diffstat is also pretty big as a lot of at91rm9200 boards were remaining.
> > 
> 
> Awesome stuff!
> 
> Two questions:
> 
> - is anything holding this up from getting merged in 3.19?
> 

If you think this is not too late in the cycle, I would say go ahead ;)

> - Are there any remaining issues that keep us from using multiplatform?
>   I know you all have been working on those a lot, but I haven't
>   checked what is still missing.
> 

As discussed some weeks ago, I prepared patches to switch sama5d[3-4] to
multiplatform. We are still missing the SMC and matrix drivers to switch
sam9 and rm9200.

The currently affected drivers are:
 - drivers/ata/pata_at91.c (SMC)
 - drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c (SMC)
 - drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c (Matrix, this is the only one
   for sam9)
 - sound/atmel/ac97c.c (that one is still not converted to DT anyway...)
 - drivers/watchdog/at91rm9200_wdt.c (WIP, will be converted properly to
   an MFD)

I'll resume working on that in December.

Do you want me to submit the sama5d[3-4] switch for 3.19? I'll have to
rebase on that series. The main remaining issue is that I couldn't work
out a way not breaking the defconfigs, even after talking with the
Kconfig maintainer so doing first sama5 then sam9/rm9200 will break the
defconfigs for sam9/rm9200 twice.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-27 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-27 16:06 [PATCH 00/11] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91rm9200 Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 01/11] ARM: at91: remove at91rm9200 legacy boards files Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06   ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 02/11] ARM: at91: remove at91rm9200 legacy board support Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06   ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 03/11] ARM: at91: switch configuration option to SOC_AT91RM9200 Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06   ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 04/11] ARM: at91/Kconfig: remove ARCH_AT91RM9200 option for drivers Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06   ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 05/11] ARM: at91: always USE_OF from now on Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06   ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 06/11] ARM: at91/trivial: update Kconfig comment to mention SAMA5 Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06   ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 07/11] ARM: at91: remove all !DT related configuration options Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06   ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 08/11] ARM: at91: remove clock data in at91sam9n12.c and at91sam9x5.c files Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06   ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 09/11] ARM: at91: remove old at91-specific clock driver Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06   ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 10/11] ARM: at91: remove legacy IRQ driver and related code Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06   ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:20   ` Julia Lawall
2014-11-27 16:20     ` Julia Lawall
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 11/11] ARM: at91: remove unused IRQ function declarations Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06   ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:49 ` [PATCH 00/11] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91rm9200 Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-27 16:49   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-27 17:12   ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2014-11-27 17:12     ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-11-27 17:38     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-27 17:38       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28  9:36       ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-28  9:36         ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-28 10:25         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 10:25           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 10:48           ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-28 10:48             ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 23:12     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-27 23:12       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-27 23:39       ` Boris Brezillon
2014-11-27 23:39         ` Boris Brezillon
2014-11-27 23:41         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-27 23:41           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28  0:28       ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-11-28  0:28         ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-11-28  8:27         ` Alexander Stein
2014-11-28  8:27           ` Alexander Stein
2014-11-28  8:49           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28  8:49             ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 11:31             ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-11-28 11:31               ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-11-28 12:06               ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 12:06                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 11:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-11-28 11:13   ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141127171243.GL4508@piout.net \
    --to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.