From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] irqchip: nvic: support routable irq domain ops
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:39:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141203093900.GL2129@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417565531-4507-5-git-send-email-stefan@agner.ch>
Hello Stefan,
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 01:12:03AM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Add support for routable irq domain ops like the GIC interrupt
> controller provides. This is useful for asymmetrical multi-
> processor SoCs, such as Freescale Vybrid (VF6xx) which have
> a Cortex-M4 alongside a Cortex-A5 and a interrupt router to
> route the peripheral interrupts between them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-nvic.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h | 25 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-nvic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-nvic.c
> index 4ff0805..dbfb5be 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-nvic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-nvic.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
> #define NVIC_MAX_IRQ ((NVIC_MAX_BANKS - 1) * 32 + 16)
>
> static struct irq_domain *nvic_irq_domain;
> +const struct irq_domain_ops *nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops;
Can you reshuffle the order of functions to make this forward
declaration unnecessary?
> asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry
> nvic_handle_irq(irq_hw_number_t hwirq, struct pt_regs *regs)
> @@ -49,6 +50,73 @@ nvic_handle_irq(irq_hw_number_t hwirq, struct pt_regs *regs)
> handle_IRQ(irq, regs);
> }
>
> +static int nvic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
> + irq_hw_number_t hw)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = irq_map_generic_chip(d, irq, hw);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret))
if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops->map(d, irq, hw);
You could save the default implementations if you do:
if (nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops)
return nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops->map(d, irq, hw);
(maybe also check for map?)
> +}
> +
> +static void nvic_irq_domain_unmap(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops->unmap(d, irq);
> +}
> +
> +static int nvic_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct device_node *controller,
> + const u32 *intspec, unsigned int intsize,
> + unsigned long *out_hwirq,
> + unsigned int *out_type)
> +{
> + *out_hwirq = intspec[0];
> + *out_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
If you demand from the callback to set this, you can just do
nvic_irq_domain_ops.xlate = new_callback;
not sure this is sensible though. Up to you.
> + return nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops->xlate(d, controller, intspec,
> + intsize, out_hwirq, out_type);
> +}
> +
> +struct irq_domain_ops nvic_irq_domain_ops = {
> + .map = nvic_irq_domain_map,
> + .unmap = nvic_irq_domain_unmap,
> + .xlate = nvic_irq_domain_xlate,
> +};
> +
> +/* Default functions for routable irq domain */
> +static int nvic_routable_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
> + irq_hw_number_t hw)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void nvic_routable_irq_domain_unmap(struct irq_domain *d,
> + unsigned int irq)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static int nvic_routable_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct device_node *controller,
> + const u32 *intspec, unsigned int intsize,
> + unsigned long *out_hwirq,
> + unsigned int *out_type)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops nvic_default_routable_irq_domain_ops = {
> + .map = nvic_routable_irq_domain_map,
> + .unmap = nvic_routable_irq_domain_unmap,
> + .xlate = nvic_routable_irq_domain_xlate,
> +};
> +
> +const struct irq_domain_ops *nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops =
> + &nvic_default_routable_irq_domain_ops;
> +
> static int __init nvic_of_init(struct device_node *node,
> struct device_node *parent)
> {
> @@ -70,7 +138,7 @@ static int __init nvic_of_init(struct device_node *node,
> irqs = NVIC_MAX_IRQ;
>
> nvic_irq_domain =
> - irq_domain_add_linear(node, irqs, &irq_generic_chip_ops, NULL);
> + irq_domain_add_linear(node, irqs, &nvic_irq_domain_ops, NULL);
> if (!nvic_irq_domain) {
> pr_warn("Failed to allocate irq domain\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0e92a14
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +/*
> + * include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h
Don't add the filename to a comment. There are more reliable means to
find it out than looking for that comment.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Stefan Agner
Is this indented differently to the paragraph below on purpose?
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +#ifndef __LINUX_IRQCHIP_ARM_NVIC_H
> +#define __LINUX_IRQCHIP_ARM_NVIC_H
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_NVIC
> +extern const struct irq_domain_ops *nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops;
> +static inline void __init register_routable_domain_ops
> + (const struct irq_domain_ops *ops)
> +{
> + nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops = ops;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM_NVIC */
> +
> +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +#endif /* __LINUX_IRQCHIP_ARM_NVIC_H */
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org>
Cc: shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org,
jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org,
olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org,
arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org,
daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org,
mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org,
galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] irqchip: nvic: support routable irq domain ops
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:39:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141203093900.GL2129@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417565531-4507-5-git-send-email-stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org>
Hello Stefan,
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 01:12:03AM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Add support for routable irq domain ops like the GIC interrupt
> controller provides. This is useful for asymmetrical multi-
> processor SoCs, such as Freescale Vybrid (VF6xx) which have
> a Cortex-M4 alongside a Cortex-A5 and a interrupt router to
> route the peripheral interrupts between them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-nvic.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h | 25 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-nvic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-nvic.c
> index 4ff0805..dbfb5be 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-nvic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-nvic.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
> #define NVIC_MAX_IRQ ((NVIC_MAX_BANKS - 1) * 32 + 16)
>
> static struct irq_domain *nvic_irq_domain;
> +const struct irq_domain_ops *nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops;
Can you reshuffle the order of functions to make this forward
declaration unnecessary?
> asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry
> nvic_handle_irq(irq_hw_number_t hwirq, struct pt_regs *regs)
> @@ -49,6 +50,73 @@ nvic_handle_irq(irq_hw_number_t hwirq, struct pt_regs *regs)
> handle_IRQ(irq, regs);
> }
>
> +static int nvic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
> + irq_hw_number_t hw)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = irq_map_generic_chip(d, irq, hw);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret))
if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops->map(d, irq, hw);
You could save the default implementations if you do:
if (nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops)
return nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops->map(d, irq, hw);
(maybe also check for map?)
> +}
> +
> +static void nvic_irq_domain_unmap(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops->unmap(d, irq);
> +}
> +
> +static int nvic_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct device_node *controller,
> + const u32 *intspec, unsigned int intsize,
> + unsigned long *out_hwirq,
> + unsigned int *out_type)
> +{
> + *out_hwirq = intspec[0];
> + *out_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
If you demand from the callback to set this, you can just do
nvic_irq_domain_ops.xlate = new_callback;
not sure this is sensible though. Up to you.
> + return nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops->xlate(d, controller, intspec,
> + intsize, out_hwirq, out_type);
> +}
> +
> +struct irq_domain_ops nvic_irq_domain_ops = {
> + .map = nvic_irq_domain_map,
> + .unmap = nvic_irq_domain_unmap,
> + .xlate = nvic_irq_domain_xlate,
> +};
> +
> +/* Default functions for routable irq domain */
> +static int nvic_routable_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
> + irq_hw_number_t hw)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void nvic_routable_irq_domain_unmap(struct irq_domain *d,
> + unsigned int irq)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static int nvic_routable_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct device_node *controller,
> + const u32 *intspec, unsigned int intsize,
> + unsigned long *out_hwirq,
> + unsigned int *out_type)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops nvic_default_routable_irq_domain_ops = {
> + .map = nvic_routable_irq_domain_map,
> + .unmap = nvic_routable_irq_domain_unmap,
> + .xlate = nvic_routable_irq_domain_xlate,
> +};
> +
> +const struct irq_domain_ops *nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops =
> + &nvic_default_routable_irq_domain_ops;
> +
> static int __init nvic_of_init(struct device_node *node,
> struct device_node *parent)
> {
> @@ -70,7 +138,7 @@ static int __init nvic_of_init(struct device_node *node,
> irqs = NVIC_MAX_IRQ;
>
> nvic_irq_domain =
> - irq_domain_add_linear(node, irqs, &irq_generic_chip_ops, NULL);
> + irq_domain_add_linear(node, irqs, &nvic_irq_domain_ops, NULL);
> if (!nvic_irq_domain) {
> pr_warn("Failed to allocate irq domain\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0e92a14
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +/*
> + * include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h
Don't add the filename to a comment. There are more reliable means to
find it out than looking for that comment.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Stefan Agner
Is this indented differently to the paragraph below on purpose?
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +#ifndef __LINUX_IRQCHIP_ARM_NVIC_H
> +#define __LINUX_IRQCHIP_ARM_NVIC_H
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_NVIC
> +extern const struct irq_domain_ops *nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops;
> +static inline void __init register_routable_domain_ops
> + (const struct irq_domain_ops *ops)
> +{
> + nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops = ops;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM_NVIC */
> +
> +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +#endif /* __LINUX_IRQCHIP_ARM_NVIC_H */
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Cc: shawn.guo@linaro.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, jason@lakedaemon.net, olof@lixom.net,
arnd@arndb.de, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mark.rutland@arm.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] irqchip: nvic: support routable irq domain ops
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:39:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141203093900.GL2129@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417565531-4507-5-git-send-email-stefan@agner.ch>
Hello Stefan,
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 01:12:03AM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Add support for routable irq domain ops like the GIC interrupt
> controller provides. This is useful for asymmetrical multi-
> processor SoCs, such as Freescale Vybrid (VF6xx) which have
> a Cortex-M4 alongside a Cortex-A5 and a interrupt router to
> route the peripheral interrupts between them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-nvic.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h | 25 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-nvic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-nvic.c
> index 4ff0805..dbfb5be 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-nvic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-nvic.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
> #define NVIC_MAX_IRQ ((NVIC_MAX_BANKS - 1) * 32 + 16)
>
> static struct irq_domain *nvic_irq_domain;
> +const struct irq_domain_ops *nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops;
Can you reshuffle the order of functions to make this forward
declaration unnecessary?
> asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry
> nvic_handle_irq(irq_hw_number_t hwirq, struct pt_regs *regs)
> @@ -49,6 +50,73 @@ nvic_handle_irq(irq_hw_number_t hwirq, struct pt_regs *regs)
> handle_IRQ(irq, regs);
> }
>
> +static int nvic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
> + irq_hw_number_t hw)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = irq_map_generic_chip(d, irq, hw);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret))
if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops->map(d, irq, hw);
You could save the default implementations if you do:
if (nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops)
return nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops->map(d, irq, hw);
(maybe also check for map?)
> +}
> +
> +static void nvic_irq_domain_unmap(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops->unmap(d, irq);
> +}
> +
> +static int nvic_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct device_node *controller,
> + const u32 *intspec, unsigned int intsize,
> + unsigned long *out_hwirq,
> + unsigned int *out_type)
> +{
> + *out_hwirq = intspec[0];
> + *out_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
If you demand from the callback to set this, you can just do
nvic_irq_domain_ops.xlate = new_callback;
not sure this is sensible though. Up to you.
> + return nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops->xlate(d, controller, intspec,
> + intsize, out_hwirq, out_type);
> +}
> +
> +struct irq_domain_ops nvic_irq_domain_ops = {
> + .map = nvic_irq_domain_map,
> + .unmap = nvic_irq_domain_unmap,
> + .xlate = nvic_irq_domain_xlate,
> +};
> +
> +/* Default functions for routable irq domain */
> +static int nvic_routable_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
> + irq_hw_number_t hw)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void nvic_routable_irq_domain_unmap(struct irq_domain *d,
> + unsigned int irq)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static int nvic_routable_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct device_node *controller,
> + const u32 *intspec, unsigned int intsize,
> + unsigned long *out_hwirq,
> + unsigned int *out_type)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops nvic_default_routable_irq_domain_ops = {
> + .map = nvic_routable_irq_domain_map,
> + .unmap = nvic_routable_irq_domain_unmap,
> + .xlate = nvic_routable_irq_domain_xlate,
> +};
> +
> +const struct irq_domain_ops *nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops =
> + &nvic_default_routable_irq_domain_ops;
> +
> static int __init nvic_of_init(struct device_node *node,
> struct device_node *parent)
> {
> @@ -70,7 +138,7 @@ static int __init nvic_of_init(struct device_node *node,
> irqs = NVIC_MAX_IRQ;
>
> nvic_irq_domain =
> - irq_domain_add_linear(node, irqs, &irq_generic_chip_ops, NULL);
> + irq_domain_add_linear(node, irqs, &nvic_irq_domain_ops, NULL);
> if (!nvic_irq_domain) {
> pr_warn("Failed to allocate irq domain\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0e92a14
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +/*
> + * include/linux/irqchip/arm-nvic.h
Don't add the filename to a comment. There are more reliable means to
find it out than looking for that comment.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Stefan Agner
Is this indented differently to the paragraph below on purpose?
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +#ifndef __LINUX_IRQCHIP_ARM_NVIC_H
> +#define __LINUX_IRQCHIP_ARM_NVIC_H
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_NVIC
> +extern const struct irq_domain_ops *nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops;
> +static inline void __init register_routable_domain_ops
> + (const struct irq_domain_ops *ops)
> +{
> + nvic_routable_irq_domain_ops = ops;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM_NVIC */
> +
> +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +#endif /* __LINUX_IRQCHIP_ARM_NVIC_H */
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-03 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-03 0:11 [PATCH 00/12] ARM: vf610m4: Add Vybrid Cortex-M4 support Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:11 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` [PATCH 01/12] ARM: dts: vf610: add routable-irqs property for gic node Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` [PATCH 02/12] ARM: dts: vf610: add Miscellaneous System Control Module (MSCM) Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` [PATCH 03/12] irqchip: gic: define register_routable_domain_ops conditional Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 10:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 10:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 10:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 13:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-12-03 13:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-12-03 13:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-12-03 17:28 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 17:28 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 19:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-03 19:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-03 19:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-04 0:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-12-04 0:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-12-04 0:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-12-04 13:35 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-04 13:35 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-04 13:35 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-04 13:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-04 13:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-04 13:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-04 13:50 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-04 13:50 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-04 13:50 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` [PATCH 04/12] irqchip: nvic: support routable irq domain ops Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 9:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2014-12-03 9:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-12-03 9:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-12-03 10:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 10:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 10:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 17:32 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 17:32 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 17:32 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` [PATCH 05/12] irqchip: nvic: increase number of external interrupts to 112 Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 8:12 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-12-03 8:12 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-12-03 8:12 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-12-03 17:40 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 17:40 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 17:40 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` [PATCH 06/12] ARM: imx: add support for MSCM interrupt router Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 10:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 10:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 0:12 ` [PATCH 07/12] Documentation: dt: imx: add MSCM documentation Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 10:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 10:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 10:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 17:49 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 17:49 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 17:49 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` [PATCH 08/12] clocksource: add dependencies for Vybrid pit clocksource Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` [PATCH 09/12] ARM: unify MMU/!MMU addruart calls Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 10:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 10:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 10:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 0:12 ` [PATCH 10/12] ARM: vf610m4: add new machine and SoC for Vybrid on Cortex-M4 Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 10:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 10:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 10:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 18:00 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 18:00 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 18:00 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` [PATCH 11/12] ARM: dts: add support for Vybrid running " Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 11:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 11:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-16 22:19 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-16 22:19 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-16 22:19 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-17 10:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-17 10:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-17 10:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-16 23:41 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-16 23:41 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-17 12:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-17 12:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-18 20:36 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-18 20:36 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-18 20:36 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-18 22:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-18 22:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-18 22:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-20 18:49 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-20 18:49 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` [PATCH 12/12] ARM: vf610m4: add defconfig for Linux on Vybrids Cortex-M4 Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-03 0:12 ` Stefan Agner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141203093900.GL2129@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.