From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Make drm_read() more robust against multithreaded races
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 09:44:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141205084416.GH20350@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417727005-26301-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 09:03:25PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The current implementation of drm_read() faces a number of issues:
>
> 1. Upon an error, it consumes the event which may lead to the client
> blocking.
> 2. Upon an error, it forgets about events already copied
> 3. If it fails to copy a single event with O_NONBLOCK it falls into a
> infinite loop of reporting EAGAIN.
> 3. There is a race between multiple waiters and blocking reads of the
> events list.
>
> Here, we inline drm_dequeue_event() into drm_read() so that we can take
> the spinlock around the list walking and event copying, and importantly
> reorder the error handling to avoid the issues above.
>
> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Imo if you go through all the trouble of fixing the corner-cases then we
should also have a testcase to exercise them. Otherwise I expect this to
fall apart again. So a little igt would be great.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
> index 91e1105f2800..076dd606b580 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c
> @@ -478,63 +478,59 @@ int drm_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_release);
>
> -static bool
> -drm_dequeue_event(struct drm_file *file_priv,
> - size_t total, size_t max, struct drm_pending_event **out)
> +ssize_t drm_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buffer,
> + size_t count, loff_t *offset)
> {
> + struct drm_file *file_priv = filp->private_data;
> struct drm_device *dev = file_priv->minor->dev;
> - struct drm_pending_event *e;
> - unsigned long flags;
> - bool ret = false;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, flags);
> + ssize_t ret = 0;
>
> - *out = NULL;
> - if (list_empty(&file_priv->event_list))
> - goto out;
> - e = list_first_entry(&file_priv->event_list,
> - struct drm_pending_event, link);
> - if (e->event->length + total > max)
> - goto out;
> + if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, buffer, count))
> + return -EFAULT;
>
> - file_priv->event_space += e->event->length;
> - list_del(&e->link);
> - *out = e;
> - ret = true;
> + spin_lock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
> + for (;;) {
> + if (list_empty(&file_priv->event_list)) {
> + if (ret)
> + break;
>
> -out:
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags);
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> -ssize_t drm_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buffer,
> - size_t count, loff_t *offset)
> -{
> - struct drm_file *file_priv = filp->private_data;
> - struct drm_pending_event *e;
> - size_t total;
> - ssize_t ret;
> + if (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
> + ret = -EAGAIN;
> + break;
> + }
>
> - if ((filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) == 0) {
> - ret = wait_event_interruptible(file_priv->event_wait,
> - !list_empty(&file_priv->event_list));
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> - }
> + spin_unlock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
> + ret = wait_event_interruptible(file_priv->event_wait,
> + !list_empty(&file_priv->event_list));
> + spin_lock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + break;
> +
> + ret = 0;
> + } else {
> + struct drm_pending_event *e;
> +
> + e = list_first_entry(&file_priv->event_list,
> + struct drm_pending_event, link);
> + if (e->event->length + ret > count)
> + break;
> +
> + if (__copy_to_user_inatomic(buffer + ret,
> + e->event, e->event->length)) {
> + if (ret == 0)
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + break;
> + }
>
> - total = 0;
> - while (drm_dequeue_event(file_priv, total, count, &e)) {
> - if (copy_to_user(buffer + total,
> - e->event, e->event->length)) {
> - total = -EFAULT;
> - break;
> + file_priv->event_space += e->event->length;
> + ret += e->event->length;
> + list_del(&e->link);
> + e->destroy(e);
> }
> -
> - total += e->event->length;
> - e->destroy(e);
> }
> + spin_unlock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
>
> - return total ?: -EAGAIN;
> + return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_read);
>
> --
> 2.1.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-05 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-04 10:56 [PATCH 1/2] drm: Fix memory leak at error path of drm_read() Takashi Iwai
2014-12-04 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm: Implement nonblocking mode in drm_read() Takashi Iwai
2014-12-04 11:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm: Fix memory leak at error path of drm_read() Daniel Vetter
2014-12-04 11:50 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-12-04 11:51 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-12-04 11:51 ` Chris Wilson
2014-12-04 11:56 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-12-04 12:13 ` Chris Wilson
2014-12-04 12:27 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-12-04 12:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-04 16:31 ` Chris Wilson
2014-12-04 16:38 ` Chris Wilson
2014-12-04 16:55 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-12-04 21:03 ` [PATCH] drm: Make drm_read() more robust against multithreaded races Chris Wilson
2014-12-05 2:19 ` shuang.he
2014-12-05 20:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-05 8:42 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-01-05 10:18 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2014-12-05 8:44 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2014-12-04 17:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm: Fix memory leak at error path of drm_read() Daniel Vetter
2014-12-05 8:01 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141205084416.GH20350@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.