From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Subject: Re: regression: Clock changes in next-20141205 break at least omap4
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 10:38:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141205183849.GB30437@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5481F79D.4010504@codeaurora.org>
* Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> [141205 10:23]:
> On 12/05/2014 08:55 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Looks like commit 646cafc6aa4d ("clk: Change clk_ops->determine_rate
> > to return a clk_hw as the best parent") breaks booting at least for
> > omap4.
>
> Do you get a compilation warning in arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c ?
Yes so it seems.
> From what I can tell omap3_noncore_dpll_determine_rate() hasn't been
> updated to take a clk_hw pointer instead of clk pointer. It was there in
> the original patch and I'm not sure why Mike dropped that part while
> applying.
OK that makes sense, Mike should apply that part too. Note that also
include/linux/clk/ti.h needs changed accordingly for struct clk_hw,
which you probably had in your orignal patch too. Assuming that's there,
please feel free to add:
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
> index 20e120d..c2da2a0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
> @@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ void omap3_noncore_dpll_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> */
> long omap3_noncore_dpll_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> unsigned long *best_parent_rate,
> - struct clk **best_parent_clk)
> + struct clk_hw **best_parent_clk)
> {
> struct clk_hw_omap *clk = to_clk_hw_omap(hw);
> struct dpll_data *dd;
> @@ -488,10 +488,10 @@ long omap3_noncore_dpll_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>
> if (__clk_get_rate(dd->clk_bypass) == rate &&
> (dd->modes & (1 << DPLL_LOW_POWER_BYPASS))) {
> - *best_parent_clk = dd->clk_bypass;
> + *best_parent_clk = __clk_get_hw(dd->clk_bypass);
> } else {
> rate = omap2_dpll_round_rate(hw, rate, best_parent_rate);
> - *best_parent_clk = dd->clk_ref;
> + *best_parent_clk = __clk_get_hw(dd->clk_ref);
> }
>
> *best_parent_rate = rate;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll44xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll44xx.c
> index 535822f..0e58e5a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll44xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll44xx.c
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ out:
> */
> long omap4_dpll_regm4xen_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> unsigned long *best_parent_rate,
> - struct clk **best_parent_clk)
> + struct clk_hw **best_parent_clk)
> {
> struct clk_hw_omap *clk = to_clk_hw_omap(hw);
> struct dpll_data *dd;
> @@ -237,11 +237,11 @@ long omap4_dpll_regm4xen_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>
> if (__clk_get_rate(dd->clk_bypass) == rate &&
> (dd->modes & (1 << DPLL_LOW_POWER_BYPASS))) {
> - *best_parent_clk = dd->clk_bypass;
> + *best_parent_clk = __clk_get_hw(dd->clk_bypass);
> } else {
> rate = omap4_dpll_regm4xen_round_rate(hw, rate,
> best_parent_rate);
> - *best_parent_clk = dd->clk_ref;
> + *best_parent_clk = __clk_get_hw(dd->clk_ref);
> }
>
> *best_parent_rate = rate;
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: regression: Clock changes in next-20141205 break at least omap4
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 10:38:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141205183849.GB30437@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5481F79D.4010504@codeaurora.org>
* Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> [141205 10:23]:
> On 12/05/2014 08:55 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Looks like commit 646cafc6aa4d ("clk: Change clk_ops->determine_rate
> > to return a clk_hw as the best parent") breaks booting at least for
> > omap4.
>
> Do you get a compilation warning in arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c ?
Yes so it seems.
> From what I can tell omap3_noncore_dpll_determine_rate() hasn't been
> updated to take a clk_hw pointer instead of clk pointer. It was there in
> the original patch and I'm not sure why Mike dropped that part while
> applying.
OK that makes sense, Mike should apply that part too. Note that also
include/linux/clk/ti.h needs changed accordingly for struct clk_hw,
which you probably had in your orignal patch too. Assuming that's there,
please feel free to add:
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
> index 20e120d..c2da2a0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
> @@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ void omap3_noncore_dpll_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> */
> long omap3_noncore_dpll_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> unsigned long *best_parent_rate,
> - struct clk **best_parent_clk)
> + struct clk_hw **best_parent_clk)
> {
> struct clk_hw_omap *clk = to_clk_hw_omap(hw);
> struct dpll_data *dd;
> @@ -488,10 +488,10 @@ long omap3_noncore_dpll_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>
> if (__clk_get_rate(dd->clk_bypass) == rate &&
> (dd->modes & (1 << DPLL_LOW_POWER_BYPASS))) {
> - *best_parent_clk = dd->clk_bypass;
> + *best_parent_clk = __clk_get_hw(dd->clk_bypass);
> } else {
> rate = omap2_dpll_round_rate(hw, rate, best_parent_rate);
> - *best_parent_clk = dd->clk_ref;
> + *best_parent_clk = __clk_get_hw(dd->clk_ref);
> }
>
> *best_parent_rate = rate;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll44xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll44xx.c
> index 535822f..0e58e5a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll44xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll44xx.c
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ out:
> */
> long omap4_dpll_regm4xen_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> unsigned long *best_parent_rate,
> - struct clk **best_parent_clk)
> + struct clk_hw **best_parent_clk)
> {
> struct clk_hw_omap *clk = to_clk_hw_omap(hw);
> struct dpll_data *dd;
> @@ -237,11 +237,11 @@ long omap4_dpll_regm4xen_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>
> if (__clk_get_rate(dd->clk_bypass) == rate &&
> (dd->modes & (1 << DPLL_LOW_POWER_BYPASS))) {
> - *best_parent_clk = dd->clk_bypass;
> + *best_parent_clk = __clk_get_hw(dd->clk_bypass);
> } else {
> rate = omap4_dpll_regm4xen_round_rate(hw, rate,
> best_parent_rate);
> - *best_parent_clk = dd->clk_ref;
> + *best_parent_clk = __clk_get_hw(dd->clk_ref);
> }
>
> *best_parent_rate = rate;
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-05 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-05 16:55 regression: Clock changes in next-20141205 break at least omap4 Tony Lindgren
2014-12-05 16:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-12-05 18:21 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-12-05 18:21 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-12-05 18:38 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2014-12-05 18:38 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <20141212194238.20398.33333@quantum>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1412122310570.29716@utopia.booyaka.com>
[not found] ` <20141215220224.20398.98259@quantum>
2014-12-16 0:21 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-16 0:21 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-16 0:38 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-12-16 0:38 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-12-16 1:31 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-16 1:31 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-16 19:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-12-16 19:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-12-16 20:01 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-16 20:01 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-16 20:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-16 20:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-16 20:45 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-16 20:45 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-16 20:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-16 20:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-16 22:25 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-16 22:25 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-17 9:52 ` Lucas Stach
2014-12-17 9:52 ` Lucas Stach
2014-12-17 11:59 ` Tero Kristo
2014-12-17 11:59 ` Tero Kristo
2014-12-19 16:45 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-19 16:45 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-18 19:23 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-18 19:23 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-18 23:37 ` Mike Turquette
2014-12-18 23:37 ` Mike Turquette
2014-12-19 2:15 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-19 2:15 ` Paul Walmsley
2014-12-20 0:23 ` Mike Turquette
2014-12-20 0:23 ` Mike Turquette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141205183849.GB30437@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.