From: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
To: Walter Lozano <walter-30ULvvUtt6G51wMPkGsGjgyUoB5FGQPZ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org,
Romain.Baeriswyl-ux6zf3SgZrrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
atull-yzvPICuk2ABMcg4IHK0kFoH6Mc4MB0Vx@public.gmane.org,
raymond.tan-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
carlpeng008-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] i2c: designware: Avoid initcall and initialize the driver like a regular one
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 20:02:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141222190233.GA1014@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1419272149-28716-1-git-send-email-walter-30ULvvUtt6G51wMPkGsGjgyUoB5FGQPZ@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1195 bytes --]
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 03:15:49PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote:
> Currently, the driver is relying on a subsys_initcall() to register
> the platform driver struct. This is typically done to allow early uses
> of the I2C bus (for instance, I2C regulators used from early machine code).
>
> While this might work on some cases, it breaks on others. For instance,
> I2C devices with GPIO-wired interrupts will fail to request the
> interrupt because of this initcall usage.
>
> This commits attempts to fix the above issue, by converting the I2C
> driver into a regular kernel platform driver. This guarantees it will
> probe after GPIOs drivers.
>
> Platforms based on devicetree won't be affected by this change.
Huh, why is that?
> Legacy platforms, relying on the I2C being available early, might need
> to implement proper defered mechanisms to overcome potential problems.
NAK. We can't say "Let's cause a regression to force people to fix
things that used to work" IMO. You exactly pointed out the problem that using
subsys_initcall() creates.
What about fixing the drivers you use to support deferred probing when
acquitin the irq?
Regards,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Walter Lozano <walter@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
Cc: mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, Romain.Baeriswyl@abilis.com,
atull@opensource.altera.com, raymond.tan@intel.com,
carlpeng008@gmail.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] i2c: designware: Avoid initcall and initialize the driver like a regular one
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 20:02:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141222190233.GA1014@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1419272149-28716-1-git-send-email-walter@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1195 bytes --]
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 03:15:49PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote:
> Currently, the driver is relying on a subsys_initcall() to register
> the platform driver struct. This is typically done to allow early uses
> of the I2C bus (for instance, I2C regulators used from early machine code).
>
> While this might work on some cases, it breaks on others. For instance,
> I2C devices with GPIO-wired interrupts will fail to request the
> interrupt because of this initcall usage.
>
> This commits attempts to fix the above issue, by converting the I2C
> driver into a regular kernel platform driver. This guarantees it will
> probe after GPIOs drivers.
>
> Platforms based on devicetree won't be affected by this change.
Huh, why is that?
> Legacy platforms, relying on the I2C being available early, might need
> to implement proper defered mechanisms to overcome potential problems.
NAK. We can't say "Let's cause a regression to force people to fix
things that used to work" IMO. You exactly pointed out the problem that using
subsys_initcall() creates.
What about fixing the drivers you use to support deferred probing when
acquitin the irq?
Regards,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-22 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-22 18:15 [RFC] i2c: designware: Avoid initcall and initialize the driver like a regular one Walter Lozano
2014-12-22 18:15 ` Walter Lozano
[not found] ` <1419272149-28716-1-git-send-email-walter-30ULvvUtt6G51wMPkGsGjgyUoB5FGQPZ@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-22 19:02 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2014-12-22 19:02 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-23 12:53 ` Walter Lozano
2014-12-23 12:53 ` Walter Lozano
2014-12-23 14:57 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-12-23 14:57 ` Ezequiel Garcia
[not found] ` <549982BE.3080500-30ULvvUtt6G51wMPkGsGjgyUoB5FGQPZ@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-23 15:26 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-23 15:26 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-23 15:32 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-12-23 15:32 ` Ezequiel Garcia
[not found] ` <54998B1A.9020208-30ULvvUtt6G51wMPkGsGjgyUoB5FGQPZ@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-23 16:23 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-23 16:23 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141222190233.GA1014@katana \
--to=wsa-z923lk4zbo2bacvfa/9k2g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Romain.Baeriswyl-ux6zf3SgZrrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=atull-yzvPICuk2ABMcg4IHK0kFoH6Mc4MB0Vx@public.gmane.org \
--cc=carlpeng008-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=raymond.tan-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=walter-30ULvvUtt6G51wMPkGsGjgyUoB5FGQPZ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.