From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 13:21:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141224182143.GA12922@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <549AB979.4050302@acm.org>
On Wed, Dec 24 2014 at 8:02am -0500,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote:
> On 12/23/14 22:42, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > I've rebased with this fix folded into both the 'for-next' and
> > 'dm-for-3.20-blk-mq' branches of linux-dm.git
>
> Thanks, that's appreciated. However, with this tree I ran into a
> different issue:
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000002a0
> IP: [<ffffffff811b2d18>] blk_account_io_completion+0x48/0x90
> PGD 8150b6067 PUD 8150b4067 PMD 0
> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
...
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ>
> [<ffffffff811b2d9a>] blk_update_request+0x3a/0x300
> [<ffffffffa000902f>] scsi_end_request+0x2f/0x1e0 [scsi_mod]
> [<ffffffffa000b451>] scsi_io_completion+0x101/0x690 [scsi_mod]
> [<ffffffffa000124a>] scsi_finish_command+0xca/0x130 [scsi_mod]
> [<ffffffffa000abff>] scsi_softirq_done+0x12f/0x160 [scsi_mod]
> [<ffffffff811ba1de>] __blk_mq_complete_request_remote+0xe/0x10
> [<ffffffff8109ea6d>] generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x5d/0x150
> [<ffffffff8102c382>] smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x22/0x40
> [<ffffffff813e925a>] call_function_single_interrupt+0x6a/0x70
> <EOI>
> [<ffffffff812f0b15>] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0x55/0xc0
> [<ffffffff812f0b07>] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0x47/0xc0
> [<ffffffff812f0c32>] cpuidle_enter+0x12/0x20
> [<ffffffff81078bcc>] cpu_startup_entry+0x22c/0x2c0
> [<ffffffff8102ca1d>] start_secondary+0x14d/0x170
>
> (gdb) list *(blk_account_io_completion+0x48)
> 0xffffffff811b2d18 is in blk_account_io_completion (block/blk-core.c:2114).
> 2109 struct hd_struct *part;
> 2110 int cpu;
> 2111
> 2112 cpu = part_stat_lock();
> 2113 part = req->part;
> 2114 part_stat_add(cpu, part, sectors[rw], bytes >> 9);
> 2115 part_stat_unlock();
> 2116 }
> 2117 }
> 2118
This is odd considering blk-mq defaults to setting QUEUE_FLAG_IO_STAT,
so each request will have REQ_IO_STAT set.
I'm not sure what would account for this NULL pointer (my code appears
to be slightly different than yours but AFAICT req->part is NULL in your
crash, which shouldn't ever happen if IO stats are enabled).
Are you manually enabling/disabling IO stats via sysfs at all?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-24 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-17 3:59 [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] block: require blk_rq_prep_clone() be given an initialized clone request Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] block: initialize bio member of blk-mq request to NULL Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] block: add blk-mq support to blk_insert_cloned_request() Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 4:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] block: mark blk-mq devices as stackable Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 4:00 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] dm: remove exports for request-based interfaces without external callers Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 4:00 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] dm: split request structure out from dm_rq_target_io structure Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 4:00 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] dm: submit stacked requests in irq enabled context Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 4:00 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] dm: allocate requests from target when stacking on blk-mq devices Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 22:35 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support Keith Busch
2014-12-17 21:43 ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-17 23:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-18 1:41 ` Keith Busch
2014-12-18 4:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-19 14:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-12-19 15:38 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-19 17:14 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-22 15:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-12-22 18:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-23 16:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-12-23 17:13 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-23 21:42 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-24 13:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-12-24 18:21 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2014-12-24 18:55 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-24 19:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-02 17:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-05 21:35 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-06 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-01-06 9:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-06 16:05 ` blk-mq request allocation stalls [was: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support] Mike Snitzer
2015-01-06 16:15 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 10:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-07 15:32 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 16:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-07 16:18 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 16:22 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-07 16:24 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 17:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-07 17:35 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 20:09 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-07 20:40 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-09 19:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-09 21:07 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-09 21:11 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-09 21:40 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-09 21:56 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-09 22:25 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-10 0:27 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-10 1:48 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-10 1:59 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-10 3:10 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 14:46 ` blk-mq request allocation stalls Bart Van Assche
2015-01-12 15:42 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 16:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-12 16:34 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 16:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 16:59 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 17:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-12 17:09 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 17:53 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-12 18:12 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 18:22 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-12 18:35 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-12 19:11 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 20:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-13 12:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-13 14:17 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-13 14:28 ` dm + blk-mq soft lockup complaint Bart Van Assche
2015-01-13 16:20 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-14 9:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-14 9:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-14 18:59 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-15 8:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-15 15:43 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-15 15:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-13 14:59 ` blk-mq request allocation stalls Jens Axboe
2015-01-13 15:11 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-13 15:27 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-13 15:41 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-13 15:14 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-27 18:42 ` blk-mq DM changes for 3.20 [was: Re: blk-mq request allocation stalls] Mike Snitzer
2015-01-28 16:42 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-28 17:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-28 17:49 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-28 18:10 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-29 22:43 ` blk-mq DM changes for 3.20 [was: Re: blk-mq request allocation stalls]X Keith Busch
2015-01-29 23:09 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-29 23:44 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-30 0:32 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 19:05 ` blk-mq request allocation stalls Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 19:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 18:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 22:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141224182143.GA12922@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.