All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: blk-mq request allocation stalls
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:09:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B3FFAE.4070609@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54B3FE89.200@sandisk.com>

On 01/12/2015 10:04 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 01/12/15 17:34, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 01/12/2015 09:12 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On 01/12/15 16:42, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On 01/12/2015 07:46 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>>>> bt_get: __bt_get() returned -1
>>>>> queue_num=2, nr_tags=62, reserved_tags=0, bits_per_word=3
>>>>> nr_free=62, nr_reserved=0, may_queue=0
>>>>> active_queues=8
>>>>
>>>> Can you add dumping of hctx->nr_active when this fails? You case is that
>>>> the may_queue logic says no-can-do, so it smells like the nr_active
>>>> accounting is wonky since you have supposedly no allocated tags, yet it
>>>> clearly thinks that you do.
>>>
>>> Hello Jens,
>>>
>>> The requested output is as follows:
>>>
>>> bt_get: __bt_get() returned -1
>>> queue_num=0, nr_tags=62, reserved_tags=0, bits_per_word=3
>>> nr_free=62, nr_reserved=0, hctx->tags->active_queues=7,
>>> hctx->nr_active=9, hctx_may_queue()=0
>>> active_queues=7
>>
>> So that does look a bit off, we have (supposedly) 9 active requests, but
>> nothing allocated. When the mkfs is done and things are idle, can you
>> try and cat the 'active' file in the mq directory? I want to see if it
>> drops to zero or stays elevated.
>
> Hello Jens,
>
> Sorry that I hadn't been more clear but the __bt_get() data in the
> previous e-mail was gathered when multipathd started instead of when
> mkfs was started. That was the time at which Mike's debug patch reported
> for the first time that __bt_get() returned -1. What is also remarkable
> is that all "__bt_get() returned -1" reports that I checked referred to
> the /dev/dm-0 device and none to any of the underlying devices
> (/dev/sd[cd]).
>
> The tag state after having stopped multipathd (systemctl stop
> multipathd) is as follows:
> # dmsetup table /dev/dm-0
> 0 256000 multipath 3 queue_if_no_path pg_init_retries 50 0 1 1
> service-time 0 2 2 8:48 1 1 8:32 1 1
> # ls -l /dev/sd[cd]
> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 32 Jan 12 17:47 /dev/sdc
> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 48 Jan 12 17:47 /dev/sdd
> # for d in sdc sdd dm-0; do echo ==== $d; (cd /sys/block/$d/mq &&
>    find|cut -c3-|grep active|xargs grep -aH ''); done
> ==== sdc
> 0/active:10
> 1/active:14
> 2/active:7
> 3/active:13
> 4/active:6
> 5/active:10
> ==== sdd
> 0/active:17
> 1/active:8
> 2/active:9
> 3/active:13
> 4/active:5
> 5/active:10
> ==== dm-0
> -bash: cd: /sys/block/dm-0/mq: No such file or directory

OK, so it's definitely leaking, but only partially - the requests are 
freed, yet the active count isn't decremented. I wonder if we're losing 
that flag along the way. It's numbered high enough that a cast to int 
will drop it, perhaps the cmd_flags is being copied/passed around as an 
int and not the appropriate u64? We've had bugs like that before.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-12 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-17  3:59 [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17  3:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] block: require blk_rq_prep_clone() be given an initialized clone request Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17  3:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] block: initialize bio member of blk-mq request to NULL Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17  3:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] block: add blk-mq support to blk_insert_cloned_request() Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17  4:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] block: mark blk-mq devices as stackable Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17  4:00 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] dm: remove exports for request-based interfaces without external callers Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17  4:00 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] dm: split request structure out from dm_rq_target_io structure Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17  4:00 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] dm: submit stacked requests in irq enabled context Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17  4:00 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] dm: allocate requests from target when stacking on blk-mq devices Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 22:35   ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support Keith Busch
2014-12-17 21:43   ` Jens Axboe
2014-12-17 23:06     ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-18  1:41       ` Keith Busch
2014-12-18  4:58         ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-19 14:32       ` Bart Van Assche
2014-12-19 15:38         ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-19 17:14           ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-22 15:28             ` Bart Van Assche
2014-12-22 18:49               ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-23 16:24                 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-12-23 17:13                   ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-23 21:42                     ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-24 13:02                       ` Bart Van Assche
2014-12-24 18:21                         ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-24 18:55                           ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-24 19:26                             ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-02 17:53                               ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-05 21:35                                 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-06  8:59                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-01-06  9:31                                   ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-06 16:05                                     ` blk-mq request allocation stalls [was: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support] Mike Snitzer
2015-01-06 16:15                                       ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 10:33                                         ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-07 15:32                                           ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 16:15                                             ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-07 16:18                                               ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 16:22                                               ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-07 16:24                                                 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 17:18                                                   ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-07 17:35                                                     ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-07 20:09                                                       ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-07 20:40                                           ` Keith Busch
2015-01-09 19:49                                             ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-09 21:07                                               ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-09 21:11                                                 ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-09 21:40                                                   ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-09 21:56                                                     ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-09 22:25                                                       ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-10  0:27                                                         ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-10  1:48                                                           ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-10  1:59                                                             ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-10  3:10                                                               ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 14:46                                                                 ` blk-mq request allocation stalls Bart Van Assche
2015-01-12 15:42                                                                   ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 16:12                                                                     ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-12 16:34                                                                       ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 16:58                                                                         ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 16:59                                                                           ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 17:04                                                                         ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-12 17:09                                                                           ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-01-12 17:53                                                                             ` Keith Busch
2015-01-12 18:12                                                                               ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 18:22                                                                                 ` Keith Busch
2015-01-12 18:35                                                                                   ` Keith Busch
2015-01-12 19:11                                                                                     ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 20:21                                                                                       ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-13 12:29                                                                                         ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-13 14:17                                                                                           ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-13 14:28                                                                                             ` dm + blk-mq soft lockup complaint Bart Van Assche
2015-01-13 16:20                                                                                               ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-14  9:16                                                                                                 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-14  9:16                                                                                                   ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-14 18:59                                                                                                   ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-15  8:11                                                                                                     ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-15 15:43                                                                                                       ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-15 15:55                                                                                                         ` Bart Van Assche
2015-01-13 14:59                                                                                     ` blk-mq request allocation stalls Jens Axboe
2015-01-13 15:11                                                                                       ` Keith Busch
2015-01-13 15:27                                                                                         ` Keith Busch
2015-01-13 15:41                                                                                         ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-13 15:14                                                                                       ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-27 18:42                                                                                       ` blk-mq DM changes for 3.20 [was: Re: blk-mq request allocation stalls] Mike Snitzer
2015-01-28 16:42                                                                                         ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-28 17:44                                                                                           ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-28 17:49                                                                                             ` Jens Axboe
2015-01-28 18:10                                                                                               ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-29 22:43                                                                                               ` blk-mq DM changes for 3.20 [was: Re: blk-mq request allocation stalls]X Keith Busch
2015-01-29 23:09                                                                                                 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-29 23:44                                                                                                   ` Keith Busch
2015-01-30  0:32                                                                                                     ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 19:05                                                                                   ` blk-mq request allocation stalls Jens Axboe
2015-01-12 19:07                                                                                 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-01-12 18:19                                                                           ` Mike Snitzer
2014-12-17 22:51   ` [PATCH v3 0/8] dm: add request-based blk-mq support Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54B3FFAE.4070609@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.