All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jweiner@redhat.com,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, rientjes@google.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: proc: task_mmu: show page size in /proc/<pid>/numa_maps
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 17:55:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150105225504.GC1795@t510.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150105133500.e0ce4b090e6b378c3edc9c56@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 01:35:00PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon,  5 Jan 2015 12:44:31 -0500 Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > This patch introduces 'kernelpagesize_kB' line element to /proc/<pid>/numa_maps
> > report file in order to help identifying the size of pages that are backing
> > memory areas mapped by a given task. This is specially useful to
> > help differentiating between HUGE and GIGANTIC page backed VMAs.
> > 
> > This patch is based on Dave Hansen's proposal and reviewer's follow-ups
> > taken from the following dicussion threads:
> >  * https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/21/454
> 
> Dave's changelog contains useful information which this one lacked.  I
> stole some of it.
> 
> : The output of /proc/$pid/numa_maps is in terms of number of pages like
> : anon=22 or dirty=54.  Here's some output:
> : 
> : 7f4680000000 default file=/hugetlb/bigfile anon=50 dirty=50 N0=50
> : 7f7659600000 default file=/anon_hugepage\040(deleted) anon=50 dirty=50 N0=50
> : 7fff8d425000 default stack anon=50 dirty=50 N0=50
> : Looks like we have a stack and a couple of anonymous hugetlbfs
> : areas page which both use the same amount of memory.  They don't.
> : 
> : The 'bigfile' uses 1GB pages and takes up ~50GB of space.  The
> : anon_hugepage uses 2MB pages and takes up ~100MB of space while the stack
> : uses normal 4k pages.  You can go over to smaps to figure out what the
> : page size _really_ is with KernelPageSize or MMUPageSize.  But, I think
> : this is a pretty nasty and counterintuitive interface as it stands.
> : 
> : This patch introduces 'kernelpagesize_kB' line element to
> : /proc/<pid>/numa_maps report file in order to help identifying the size of
> : pages that are backing memory areas mapped by a given task.  This is
> : specially useful to help differentiating between HUGE and GIGANTIC page
> : backed VMAs.
> : 
> : This patch is based on Dave Hansen's proposal and reviewer's follow-ups
> : taken from the following dicussion threads:
> :  * https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/21/454
> :  * https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/20/66
> 
> 
> > +	seq_printf(m, " kernelpagesize_kB=%lu", vma_kernel_pagesize(vma) >> 10);
> 
> This changes the format of the numa_maps file and can potentially break
> existing parsers.  Please discuss.
> 
> I'd complain about the patch's failure to update the documentation,
> except numa_maps appears to be undocumented.  Sigh.  What the heck is "N0"?
>
That's a nice opportunity to attempt to sharp my doc writing skills.
Sorry for the total failure to identify it earlier.
I just took it as a TODO note to send a patch to document this interface soon.

Happy new year.
-- Rafael

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jweiner@redhat.com,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, rientjes@google.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: proc: task_mmu: show page size in /proc/<pid>/numa_maps
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 17:55:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150105225504.GC1795@t510.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150105133500.e0ce4b090e6b378c3edc9c56@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 01:35:00PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon,  5 Jan 2015 12:44:31 -0500 Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > This patch introduces 'kernelpagesize_kB' line element to /proc/<pid>/numa_maps
> > report file in order to help identifying the size of pages that are backing
> > memory areas mapped by a given task. This is specially useful to
> > help differentiating between HUGE and GIGANTIC page backed VMAs.
> > 
> > This patch is based on Dave Hansen's proposal and reviewer's follow-ups
> > taken from the following dicussion threads:
> >  * https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/21/454
> 
> Dave's changelog contains useful information which this one lacked.  I
> stole some of it.
> 
> : The output of /proc/$pid/numa_maps is in terms of number of pages like
> : anon=22 or dirty=54.  Here's some output:
> : 
> : 7f4680000000 default file=/hugetlb/bigfile anon=50 dirty=50 N0=50
> : 7f7659600000 default file=/anon_hugepage\040(deleted) anon=50 dirty=50 N0=50
> : 7fff8d425000 default stack anon=50 dirty=50 N0=50
> : Looks like we have a stack and a couple of anonymous hugetlbfs
> : areas page which both use the same amount of memory.  They don't.
> : 
> : The 'bigfile' uses 1GB pages and takes up ~50GB of space.  The
> : anon_hugepage uses 2MB pages and takes up ~100MB of space while the stack
> : uses normal 4k pages.  You can go over to smaps to figure out what the
> : page size _really_ is with KernelPageSize or MMUPageSize.  But, I think
> : this is a pretty nasty and counterintuitive interface as it stands.
> : 
> : This patch introduces 'kernelpagesize_kB' line element to
> : /proc/<pid>/numa_maps report file in order to help identifying the size of
> : pages that are backing memory areas mapped by a given task.  This is
> : specially useful to help differentiating between HUGE and GIGANTIC page
> : backed VMAs.
> : 
> : This patch is based on Dave Hansen's proposal and reviewer's follow-ups
> : taken from the following dicussion threads:
> :  * https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/21/454
> :  * https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/20/66
> 
> 
> > +	seq_printf(m, " kernelpagesize_kB=%lu", vma_kernel_pagesize(vma) >> 10);
> 
> This changes the format of the numa_maps file and can potentially break
> existing parsers.  Please discuss.
> 
> I'd complain about the patch's failure to update the documentation,
> except numa_maps appears to be undocumented.  Sigh.  What the heck is "N0"?
>
That's a nice opportunity to attempt to sharp my doc writing skills.
Sorry for the total failure to identify it earlier.
I just took it as a TODO note to send a patch to document this interface soon.

Happy new year.
-- Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-05 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-05 17:44 [PATCH v2] fs: proc: task_mmu: show page size in /proc/<pid>/numa_maps Rafael Aquini
2015-01-05 17:44 ` Rafael Aquini
2015-01-05 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2015-01-05 21:35   ` Andrew Morton
2015-01-05 22:55   ` Rafael Aquini [this message]
2015-01-05 22:55     ` Rafael Aquini
2015-01-05 23:08     ` Rafael Aquini
2015-01-05 23:08       ` Rafael Aquini
     [not found]     ` <20150105152037.5a33e34652db6b82fcfd46bf@linux-foundation.org>
2015-01-06  0:21       ` Rafael Aquini
2015-01-06  0:21         ` Rafael Aquini
2015-01-06  0:31         ` Andrew Morton
2015-01-06  0:31           ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150105225504.GC1795@t510.redhat.com \
    --to=aquini@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.