[PATCH f2fs] f2fs: pids_lock can be static

[PATCH f2fs] f2fs: pids_lock can be static

[kbuild test robot]

fs/f2fs/trace.c:19:12: sparse: symbol 'pids_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
 trace.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/trace.c b/fs/f2fs/trace.c
index 92fa38a..517dfe5 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/trace.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/trace.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 #include "trace.h"
 
 RADIX_TREE(pids, GFP_ATOMIC);
-spinlock_t pids_lock;
+static spinlock_t pids_lock;
 struct last_io_info last_io;
 
 static inline void __print_last_io(void)

[f2fs:linux-3.4 31/33] fs/f2fs/trace.c:19:12: sparse: symbol 'pids_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?

[kbuild test robot]

tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs linux-3.4
head:   a725baf7b8472a0b97dc12ed4d1c147cad2f3e8c
commit: 37a78eb5019798c94d4543c48e1d6490a552e1c7 [31/33] f2fs: add spin_lock to cover radix operations in IO tracer
reproduce:
  # apt-get install sparse
  git checkout 37a78eb5019798c94d4543c48e1d6490a552e1c7
  make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
  make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> fs/f2fs/trace.c:19:12: sparse: symbol 'pids_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
http://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild                 Intel Corporation