From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] mm: vmscan: account slab pages on memcg reclaim
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:46:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150113074633.GG2110@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150112221839.GB25609@phnom.home.cmpxchg.org>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 05:18:39PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:30:37PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > Since try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() can now call slab shrinkers, we
> > should initialize reclaim_state and account reclaimed slab pages in
> > scan_control->nr_reclaimed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
> > ---
> > mm/vmscan.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index 16f3e45742d6..b2c041139a51 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -367,13 +367,16 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
> > * the ->seeks setting of the shrink function, which indicates the
> > * cost to recreate an object relative to that of an LRU page.
> > *
> > - * Returns the number of reclaimed slab objects.
> > + * Returns the number of reclaimed slab objects. The number of reclaimed
> > + * pages is added to *@ret_nr_reclaimed.
> >
> > static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> > struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > unsigned long nr_scanned,
> > - unsigned long nr_eligible)
> > + unsigned long nr_eligible,
> > + unsigned long *ret_nr_reclaimed)
>
> Can't we just return the number of pages directly from this function?
Hmm, we can. That would look better, of course. However, reclaimed_slab
can be 0 even if we reclaimed tons of dentries/inodes, simply because
they are freed by rcu. In this case, we can abort drop_slab beforehand.
Do you think it's OK?
Thanks,
Vladimir
>
> > @@ -426,7 +434,7 @@ void drop_slab_node(int nid)
> > freed = 0;
> > do {
> > freed += shrink_slab(GFP_KERNEL, nid, memcg,
> > - 1000, 1000);
> > + 1000, 1000, &nr_reclaimed);
> > } while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) != NULL);
> > } while (freed > 10);
>
> This is the only caller that cares about the return value, and it's a
> magic number that could probably be changed to comparing with a magic
> number of pages instead.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] mm: vmscan: account slab pages on memcg reclaim
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:46:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150113074633.GG2110@esperanza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150112221839.GB25609@phnom.home.cmpxchg.org>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 05:18:39PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:30:37PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > Since try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() can now call slab shrinkers, we
> > should initialize reclaim_state and account reclaimed slab pages in
> > scan_control->nr_reclaimed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
> > ---
> > mm/vmscan.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index 16f3e45742d6..b2c041139a51 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -367,13 +367,16 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
> > * the ->seeks setting of the shrink function, which indicates the
> > * cost to recreate an object relative to that of an LRU page.
> > *
> > - * Returns the number of reclaimed slab objects.
> > + * Returns the number of reclaimed slab objects. The number of reclaimed
> > + * pages is added to *@ret_nr_reclaimed.
> >
> > static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> > struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > unsigned long nr_scanned,
> > - unsigned long nr_eligible)
> > + unsigned long nr_eligible,
> > + unsigned long *ret_nr_reclaimed)
>
> Can't we just return the number of pages directly from this function?
Hmm, we can. That would look better, of course. However, reclaimed_slab
can be 0 even if we reclaimed tons of dentries/inodes, simply because
they are freed by rcu. In this case, we can abort drop_slab beforehand.
Do you think it's OK?
Thanks,
Vladimir
>
> > @@ -426,7 +434,7 @@ void drop_slab_node(int nid)
> > freed = 0;
> > do {
> > freed += shrink_slab(GFP_KERNEL, nid, memcg,
> > - 1000, 1000);
> > + 1000, 1000, &nr_reclaimed);
> > } while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) != NULL);
> > } while (freed > 10);
>
> This is the only caller that cares about the return value, and it's a
> magic number that could probably be changed to comparing with a magic
> number of pages instead.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-13 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-12 9:30 [PATCH -mm 1/2] mm: vmscan: account slab pages on memcg reclaim Vladimir Davydov
2015-01-12 9:30 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-01-12 9:30 ` [PATCH -mm 2/2] mm: vmscan: init reclaim_state in do_try_to_free_pages Vladimir Davydov
2015-01-12 9:30 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-01-12 22:26 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-01-12 22:26 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-01-13 7:55 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-01-13 7:55 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-01-12 22:18 ` [PATCH -mm 1/2] mm: vmscan: account slab pages on memcg reclaim Johannes Weiner
2015-01-12 22:18 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-01-13 7:46 ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2015-01-13 7:46 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-01-15 13:17 ` Michal Hocko
2015-01-15 13:17 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150113074633.GG2110@esperanza \
--to=vdavydov@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.