* xen-compat.h vs 4.5
@ 2015-01-14 10:36 Jan Beulich
2015-01-14 11:31 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-01-14 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
All,
while we don't have any changes in the public interface depending on
__XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION__ <relation> 0x00040500, shouldn't
we nevertheless update xen-compat.h's
__XEN_LATEST_INTERFACE_VERSION__ for 4.5?
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: xen-compat.h vs 4.5
2015-01-14 10:36 xen-compat.h vs 4.5 Jan Beulich
@ 2015-01-14 11:31 ` Ian Campbell
2015-01-14 11:43 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2015-01-14 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: xen-devel
(CCing Konrad==RM)
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 10:36 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> All,
>
> while we don't have any changes in the public interface depending on
> __XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION__ <relation> 0x00040500, shouldn't
> we nevertheless update xen-compat.h's
> __XEN_LATEST_INTERFACE_VERSION__ for 4.5?
We probably should have done, but I think it is too late now unless we
think we could justify force pushing such a change, which I doubt.
I think it's a bit of a tree falling in the woods change anyway, if
there are no relevant changes would anyone notice if it remained at 4.4?
Perhaps for 4.5.1? (But it doesn't sound entirely stable release
material too me...)
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: xen-compat.h vs 4.5
2015-01-14 11:31 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2015-01-14 11:43 ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-14 18:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-01-14 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell; +Cc: xen-devel
>>> On 14.01.15 at 12:31, <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 10:36 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> while we don't have any changes in the public interface depending on
>> __XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION__ <relation> 0x00040500, shouldn't
>> we nevertheless update xen-compat.h's
>> __XEN_LATEST_INTERFACE_VERSION__ for 4.5?
>
> We probably should have done, but I think it is too late now unless we
> think we could justify force pushing such a change, which I doubt.
>
> I think it's a bit of a tree falling in the woods change anyway, if
> there are no relevant changes would anyone notice if it remained at 4.4?
I noticed when I wanted to set the XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION config
option to 0x00040500 in the 2.6.18-xen tree.
> Perhaps for 4.5.1? (But it doesn't sound entirely stable release
> material too me...)
If we were to do such a change on master only, I think I'd backport
it for 4.5.1 irrespective of how important we'd consider such a change.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: xen-compat.h vs 4.5
2015-01-14 11:43 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2015-01-14 18:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk @ 2015-01-14 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: xen-devel, Ian Campbell
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:43:31AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 14.01.15 at 12:31, <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 10:36 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> while we don't have any changes in the public interface depending on
> >> __XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION__ <relation> 0x00040500, shouldn't
> >> we nevertheless update xen-compat.h's
> >> __XEN_LATEST_INTERFACE_VERSION__ for 4.5?
> >
> > We probably should have done, but I think it is too late now unless we
> > think we could justify force pushing such a change, which I doubt.
> >
> > I think it's a bit of a tree falling in the woods change anyway, if
> > there are no relevant changes would anyone notice if it remained at 4.4?
>
> I noticed when I wanted to set the XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION config
> option to 0x00040500 in the 2.6.18-xen tree.
>
> > Perhaps for 4.5.1? (But it doesn't sound entirely stable release
> > material too me...)
>
> If we were to do such a change on master only, I think I'd backport
> it for 4.5.1 irrespective of how important we'd consider such a change.
<nods> I concur.
>
> Jan
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-14 18:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-14 10:36 xen-compat.h vs 4.5 Jan Beulich
2015-01-14 11:31 ` Ian Campbell
2015-01-14 11:43 ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-14 18:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.