From: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
To: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org>
Cc: jdelvare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
Lawnick Michael 61283229
<michael.lawnick-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org>,
Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of: i2c: Add idle-disconnect DT property to PCA954x mux driver
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:19:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150115131935.GE2549@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54B7BBF5.4010001-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1813 bytes --]
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 02:09:09PM +0100, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> Hi Wolfram!
>
> On 15/01/15 13:32, ext Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:00:10PM +0100, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> >> of: i2c: Add idle-disconnect DT property to PCA954x mux driver
> >>
> >> Add idle-disconnect device tree property to PCA954x mux driver. The new property
> >> forces the multiplexer to disconnect child buses in idle state. This is used, for
> >> example, when there are several multiplexers on the same bus and the devices on
> >> the underlying buses might have same I2C addresses.
> >
> > Basically OK. Question to DT maintainers: "idle-disconnect",
> > "i2c-mux-idle-disconnect", or is there another existing binding we could
> > use?
> >
> >> At the same time old (and not used in the tree) platform data binding
> >> deselect_on_exit is removed to simplify the implementation. Old binding has
> >> different (per-channel) semantics and doesn't fit well in the new concept.
> >
> > I'd prefer to keep it. It should be only one || more. It is not really
> > in the way IMO.
>
> It complicates the implementation 3x times :) This is part of our discussion with Laurent:
Does it? I don't want DT and platform_data to behave equally. I just
want to keep being backwards compatible. So, I'd suggest:
(pdata && pdata->modes[num].deselect_on_exit) || idle_disconnect ? pca954x_deselect_mux : NULL);
> > I'm not keen to brake out-of-tree code (if any), but may be it will be
> > decided to drop this per-channel deselect_on_exit, because it's not used at
> > least in the kernel tree...
I couldn't find a user of the platform_data, at all. But removing
platform_data support is a seperate patch, and deprecating platform_data
is a seperate and general issue IMO.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-15 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-19 17:00 [PATCH v2] of: i2c: Add idle-disconnect DT property to PCA954x mux driver Alexander Sverdlin
[not found] ` <5494599A.8050803-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-15 12:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-15 13:09 ` Alexander Sverdlin
[not found] ` <54B7BBF5.4010001-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-15 13:19 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2015-01-15 13:35 ` Alexander Sverdlin
[not found] ` <54B7C206.8030809-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-19 13:29 ` [PATCH v3] of: i2c: Add i2c-mux-idle-disconnect " Alexander Sverdlin
[not found] ` <54BD069C.2080108-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-22 14:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-23 15:41 ` [PATCH v4] " Alexander Sverdlin
[not found] ` <54C26BA9.4050405-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-23 16:13 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-15 14:40 ` [PATCH v2] of: i2c: Add idle-disconnect " Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-15 15:48 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150115131935.GE2549@katana \
--to=wsa-z923lk4zbo2bacvfa/9k2g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=alexander.sverdlin-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jdelvare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=michael.lawnick-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.