All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Consolidate hotplug notifier for instruction emulation
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:07:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150116160730.GY7091@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421325366-13263-3-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:36:05PM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> 
> As of now each insn_emulation has a cpu hotplug notifier that
> enables/disables the CPU feature bit for the functionality. This
> patch re-arranges the code, such that there is only one notifier
> that runs through the list of registered emulation hooks and runs
> their corresponding set_hw_mode.
> 
> We do nothing when a CPU is dying as we will set the appropriate bits
> as it comes back online based on the state of the hooks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/arm64/legacy_instructions.txt |    4 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h         |    2 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c        |  113 +++++++++++++++------------
>  3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/legacy_instructions.txt b/Documentation/arm64/legacy_instructions.txt
> index a3b3da2..0a4dc26 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arm64/legacy_instructions.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/legacy_instructions.txt
> @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ behaviours and the corresponding values of the sysctl nodes -
>    instructions. Using hardware execution generally provides better
>    performance, but at the loss of ability to gather runtime statistics
>    about the use of the deprecated instructions.
> +  Note: Emulation of a deprecated instruction depends on the availability
> +  of the feature on all the active CPUs. In case of CPU hotplug, if a new
> +  CPU doesn't support a feature, it could result in the abortion of the
> +  hotplug operation.

Is this true? We should be able to *emulate* the instruction anywhere,
it's the "hardware execution" setting that needs CPU support.

>  The default mode depends on the status of the instruction in the
>  architecture. Deprecated instructions should default to emulation
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index c7f68d1..a56b45f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
>  #define ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1_BigEndEL0	(0x1UL << 16)
>  #define ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1_BigEnd		(0x1UL << 8)
>  
> +#define SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN 	(1 << 5)
> +
>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>  
>  extern DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_hwcaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> index c363671..be64218 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <asm/system_misc.h>
>  #include <asm/traps.h>
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> +#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>  
>  #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>  #include "trace-events-emulation.h"
> @@ -46,7 +47,7 @@ struct insn_emulation_ops {
>  	const char		*name;
>  	enum legacy_insn_status	status;
>  	struct undef_hook	*hooks;
> -	int			(*set_hw_mode)(bool enable);
> +	int			(*set_hw_mode)(void *enable);

I think it would be cleaner to have a wrapper for the on_each_cpu
variant of this, otherwise we lose the type information altogether.

>  };
>  
>  struct insn_emulation {
> @@ -85,6 +86,40 @@ static void remove_emulation_hooks(struct insn_emulation_ops *ops)
>  	pr_notice("Removed %s emulation handler\n", ops->name);
>  }
>  
> +/* Run set_hw_mode(mode) on all active CPUs */
> +static int run_all_cpu_set_hw_mode(struct insn_emulation *insn, bool enable)
> +{
> +	void (*set_hw_mode)(void *) = (void (*) (void *))insn->ops->set_hw_mode;
> +	if (!set_hw_mode)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	on_each_cpu(set_hw_mode, (void *)enable, true);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Run set_hw_mode for all insns on a starting CPU.
> + * Returns:
> + *  0 		- If all the hooks ran successfully.
> + * -EINVAL	- At least one hook is not supported by the CPU.
> + *		  abort the hotplug.
> + */
> +static int run_all_insn_set_hw_mode(void)
> +{
> +	int rc = 0;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	struct insn_emulation *insn;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&insn_emulation_lock, flags);
> +	list_for_each_entry(insn, &insn_emulation, node) {
> +		bool hw_mode = (insn->current_mode == INSN_HW);
> +		if (insn->ops->set_hw_mode &&
> +			insn->ops->set_hw_mode((void*)hw_mode))
> +			rc = -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&insn_emulation_lock, flags);
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
>  static int update_insn_emulation_mode(struct insn_emulation *insn,
>  				       enum insn_emulation_mode prev)
>  {
> @@ -97,10 +132,8 @@ static int update_insn_emulation_mode(struct insn_emulation *insn,
>  		remove_emulation_hooks(insn->ops);
>  		break;
>  	case INSN_HW:
> -		if (insn->ops->set_hw_mode) {
> -			insn->ops->set_hw_mode(false);
> +		if (!run_all_cpu_set_hw_mode(insn, false))
>  			pr_notice("Disabled %s support\n", insn->ops->name);
> -		}
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -111,10 +144,9 @@ static int update_insn_emulation_mode(struct insn_emulation *insn,
>  		register_emulation_hooks(insn->ops);
>  		break;
>  	case INSN_HW:
> -		if (insn->ops->set_hw_mode && insn->ops->set_hw_mode(true))
> +		ret = run_all_cpu_set_hw_mode(insn, true);
> +		if (!ret)
>  			pr_notice("Enabled %s support\n", insn->ops->name);
> -		else
> -			ret = -EINVAL;
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -133,6 +165,8 @@ static void register_insn_emulation(struct insn_emulation_ops *ops)
>  	switch (ops->status) {
>  	case INSN_DEPRECATED:
>  		insn->current_mode = INSN_EMULATE;
> +		/* Disable the HW mode if it was turned on at early boot time */
> +		run_all_cpu_set_hw_mode(insn, false);
>  		insn->max = INSN_HW;
>  		break;
>  	case INSN_OBSOLETE:
> @@ -453,8 +487,6 @@ ret:
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -#define SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN (1 << 5)
> -
>  static inline void config_sctlr_el1(u32 clear, u32 set)
>  {
>  	u32 val;
> @@ -465,48 +497,13 @@ static inline void config_sctlr_el1(u32 clear, u32 set)
>  	asm volatile("msr sctlr_el1, %0" : : "r" (val));
>  }
>  
> -static void enable_cp15_ben(void *info)
> -{
> -	config_sctlr_el1(0, SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN);
> -}
> -
> -static void disable_cp15_ben(void *info)
> +static int cp15_barrier_set_hw_mode(void *enable)
>  {
> -	config_sctlr_el1(SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN, 0);
> -}
> -
> -static int cpu_hotplug_notify(struct notifier_block *b,
> -			      unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> -{
> -	switch (action) {
> -	case CPU_STARTING:
> -	case CPU_STARTING_FROZEN:
> -		enable_cp15_ben(NULL);
> -		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> -	case CPU_DYING:
> -	case CPU_DYING_FROZEN:
> -		disable_cp15_ben(NULL);
> -		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> -	}
> -
> -	return NOTIFY_OK;
> -}
> -
> -static struct notifier_block cpu_hotplug_notifier = {
> -	.notifier_call = cpu_hotplug_notify,
> -};
> -
> -static int cp15_barrier_set_hw_mode(bool enable)
> -{
> -	if (enable) {
> -		register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_hotplug_notifier);
> -		on_each_cpu(enable_cp15_ben, NULL, true);
> -	} else {
> -		unregister_cpu_notifier(&cpu_hotplug_notifier);
> -		on_each_cpu(disable_cp15_ben, NULL, true);
> -	}
> -
> -	return true;
> +	if (enable)
> +		config_sctlr_el1(0, SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN);
> +	else
> +		config_sctlr_el1(SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN, 0);
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static struct undef_hook cp15_barrier_hooks[] = {
> @@ -534,6 +531,21 @@ static struct insn_emulation_ops cp15_barrier_ops = {
>  	.set_hw_mode = cp15_barrier_set_hw_mode,
>  };
>  
> +static int insn_cpu_hotplug_notify(struct notifier_block *b,
> +			      unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> +{
> +	int rc = 0;
> +	if ((action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) == CPU_STARTING)
> +		rc = run_all_insn_set_hw_mode();
> +
> +	/* Abort the CPU hotplug if there is an incompatibility */
> +	return notifier_from_errno(rc);

Could we restrict the emulation options instead and just disable hardware
support for the instruction?

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"leo.yan@linaro.org" <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	"yexl@marvell.com" <yexl@marvell.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Consolidate hotplug notifier for instruction emulation
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:07:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150116160730.GY7091@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421325366-13263-3-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:36:05PM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> 
> As of now each insn_emulation has a cpu hotplug notifier that
> enables/disables the CPU feature bit for the functionality. This
> patch re-arranges the code, such that there is only one notifier
> that runs through the list of registered emulation hooks and runs
> their corresponding set_hw_mode.
> 
> We do nothing when a CPU is dying as we will set the appropriate bits
> as it comes back online based on the state of the hooks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/arm64/legacy_instructions.txt |    4 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h         |    2 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c        |  113 +++++++++++++++------------
>  3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/legacy_instructions.txt b/Documentation/arm64/legacy_instructions.txt
> index a3b3da2..0a4dc26 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arm64/legacy_instructions.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/legacy_instructions.txt
> @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ behaviours and the corresponding values of the sysctl nodes -
>    instructions. Using hardware execution generally provides better
>    performance, but at the loss of ability to gather runtime statistics
>    about the use of the deprecated instructions.
> +  Note: Emulation of a deprecated instruction depends on the availability
> +  of the feature on all the active CPUs. In case of CPU hotplug, if a new
> +  CPU doesn't support a feature, it could result in the abortion of the
> +  hotplug operation.

Is this true? We should be able to *emulate* the instruction anywhere,
it's the "hardware execution" setting that needs CPU support.

>  The default mode depends on the status of the instruction in the
>  architecture. Deprecated instructions should default to emulation
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index c7f68d1..a56b45f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
>  #define ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1_BigEndEL0	(0x1UL << 16)
>  #define ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1_BigEnd		(0x1UL << 8)
>  
> +#define SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN 	(1 << 5)
> +
>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>  
>  extern DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_hwcaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> index c363671..be64218 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <asm/system_misc.h>
>  #include <asm/traps.h>
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> +#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>  
>  #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>  #include "trace-events-emulation.h"
> @@ -46,7 +47,7 @@ struct insn_emulation_ops {
>  	const char		*name;
>  	enum legacy_insn_status	status;
>  	struct undef_hook	*hooks;
> -	int			(*set_hw_mode)(bool enable);
> +	int			(*set_hw_mode)(void *enable);

I think it would be cleaner to have a wrapper for the on_each_cpu
variant of this, otherwise we lose the type information altogether.

>  };
>  
>  struct insn_emulation {
> @@ -85,6 +86,40 @@ static void remove_emulation_hooks(struct insn_emulation_ops *ops)
>  	pr_notice("Removed %s emulation handler\n", ops->name);
>  }
>  
> +/* Run set_hw_mode(mode) on all active CPUs */
> +static int run_all_cpu_set_hw_mode(struct insn_emulation *insn, bool enable)
> +{
> +	void (*set_hw_mode)(void *) = (void (*) (void *))insn->ops->set_hw_mode;
> +	if (!set_hw_mode)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	on_each_cpu(set_hw_mode, (void *)enable, true);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Run set_hw_mode for all insns on a starting CPU.
> + * Returns:
> + *  0 		- If all the hooks ran successfully.
> + * -EINVAL	- At least one hook is not supported by the CPU.
> + *		  abort the hotplug.
> + */
> +static int run_all_insn_set_hw_mode(void)
> +{
> +	int rc = 0;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	struct insn_emulation *insn;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&insn_emulation_lock, flags);
> +	list_for_each_entry(insn, &insn_emulation, node) {
> +		bool hw_mode = (insn->current_mode == INSN_HW);
> +		if (insn->ops->set_hw_mode &&
> +			insn->ops->set_hw_mode((void*)hw_mode))
> +			rc = -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&insn_emulation_lock, flags);
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
>  static int update_insn_emulation_mode(struct insn_emulation *insn,
>  				       enum insn_emulation_mode prev)
>  {
> @@ -97,10 +132,8 @@ static int update_insn_emulation_mode(struct insn_emulation *insn,
>  		remove_emulation_hooks(insn->ops);
>  		break;
>  	case INSN_HW:
> -		if (insn->ops->set_hw_mode) {
> -			insn->ops->set_hw_mode(false);
> +		if (!run_all_cpu_set_hw_mode(insn, false))
>  			pr_notice("Disabled %s support\n", insn->ops->name);
> -		}
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -111,10 +144,9 @@ static int update_insn_emulation_mode(struct insn_emulation *insn,
>  		register_emulation_hooks(insn->ops);
>  		break;
>  	case INSN_HW:
> -		if (insn->ops->set_hw_mode && insn->ops->set_hw_mode(true))
> +		ret = run_all_cpu_set_hw_mode(insn, true);
> +		if (!ret)
>  			pr_notice("Enabled %s support\n", insn->ops->name);
> -		else
> -			ret = -EINVAL;
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -133,6 +165,8 @@ static void register_insn_emulation(struct insn_emulation_ops *ops)
>  	switch (ops->status) {
>  	case INSN_DEPRECATED:
>  		insn->current_mode = INSN_EMULATE;
> +		/* Disable the HW mode if it was turned on at early boot time */
> +		run_all_cpu_set_hw_mode(insn, false);
>  		insn->max = INSN_HW;
>  		break;
>  	case INSN_OBSOLETE:
> @@ -453,8 +487,6 @@ ret:
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -#define SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN (1 << 5)
> -
>  static inline void config_sctlr_el1(u32 clear, u32 set)
>  {
>  	u32 val;
> @@ -465,48 +497,13 @@ static inline void config_sctlr_el1(u32 clear, u32 set)
>  	asm volatile("msr sctlr_el1, %0" : : "r" (val));
>  }
>  
> -static void enable_cp15_ben(void *info)
> -{
> -	config_sctlr_el1(0, SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN);
> -}
> -
> -static void disable_cp15_ben(void *info)
> +static int cp15_barrier_set_hw_mode(void *enable)
>  {
> -	config_sctlr_el1(SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN, 0);
> -}
> -
> -static int cpu_hotplug_notify(struct notifier_block *b,
> -			      unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> -{
> -	switch (action) {
> -	case CPU_STARTING:
> -	case CPU_STARTING_FROZEN:
> -		enable_cp15_ben(NULL);
> -		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> -	case CPU_DYING:
> -	case CPU_DYING_FROZEN:
> -		disable_cp15_ben(NULL);
> -		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> -	}
> -
> -	return NOTIFY_OK;
> -}
> -
> -static struct notifier_block cpu_hotplug_notifier = {
> -	.notifier_call = cpu_hotplug_notify,
> -};
> -
> -static int cp15_barrier_set_hw_mode(bool enable)
> -{
> -	if (enable) {
> -		register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_hotplug_notifier);
> -		on_each_cpu(enable_cp15_ben, NULL, true);
> -	} else {
> -		unregister_cpu_notifier(&cpu_hotplug_notifier);
> -		on_each_cpu(disable_cp15_ben, NULL, true);
> -	}
> -
> -	return true;
> +	if (enable)
> +		config_sctlr_el1(0, SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN);
> +	else
> +		config_sctlr_el1(SCTLR_EL1_CP15BEN, 0);
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static struct undef_hook cp15_barrier_hooks[] = {
> @@ -534,6 +531,21 @@ static struct insn_emulation_ops cp15_barrier_ops = {
>  	.set_hw_mode = cp15_barrier_set_hw_mode,
>  };
>  
> +static int insn_cpu_hotplug_notify(struct notifier_block *b,
> +			      unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> +{
> +	int rc = 0;
> +	if ((action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) == CPU_STARTING)
> +		rc = run_all_insn_set_hw_mode();
> +
> +	/* Abort the CPU hotplug if there is an incompatibility */
> +	return notifier_from_errno(rc);

Could we restrict the emulation options instead and just disable hardware
support for the instruction?

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-16 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-15 12:36 [PATCHv2 0/3] Handle SETEND for AArch32 tasks Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-15 12:36 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-15 12:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: Track system support for mixed endian EL0 Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-15 12:36   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-16 15:53   ` Will Deacon
2015-01-16 15:53     ` Will Deacon
2015-01-16 16:15     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-16 16:15       ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-19  9:41       ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-19  9:41         ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-15 12:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Consolidate hotplug notifier for instruction emulation Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-15 12:36   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-16 16:07   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-01-16 16:07     ` Will Deacon
2015-01-16 16:32     ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-16 16:32       ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-16 16:44       ` Will Deacon
2015-01-16 16:44         ` Will Deacon
2015-01-16 16:48         ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-16 16:48           ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-16 16:47     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-16 16:47       ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-15 12:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Emulate SETEND for AArch32 tasks Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-15 12:36   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-16 16:56   ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-16 16:56     ` Mark Rutland
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-21 12:43 [PATCHv3 0/3] Handle " Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-21 12:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: Track system support for mixed endian EL0 Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-21 12:43   ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Consolidate hotplug notifier for instruction emulation Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-21 12:43     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-01-23 12:31     ` Punit Agrawal
2015-01-23 12:31       ` Punit Agrawal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150116160730.GY7091@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.