From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: add lubbock-io binding
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:35:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150119083533.GF21886@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421406010-14851-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Add a binding for lubbock motherboard IO board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/lubbock-io.txt | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/lubbock-io.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/lubbock-io.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/lubbock-io.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..33c9e21
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/lubbock-io.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +Intel's pxa255 system development platform motherboard.
s/pxa25/PXA25/
"system development platform motherboard" doesn't quite sit right with me.
How about "Intel Xscale PXA255 development platform (Lubbock)"?
> +This is the motherboard, or IO board, of the pxa25x development system,
> +supporting a lubbock pxa25x SoC board.
Again, this sounds weird.
> +Required properties:
> + - compatible : One of the following chip-specific strings:
> + "intel,lubbock-io"
An odd thing to say with only one entry.
Also, please line it up to the right of the ':' above.
> + - interrupts : The first interrupt is the line the /IRQ signal the IO board
> + multiplex is connected to. The only known case is GPIO0 on the
> + pxa25x SoC.
Can you get someone to help you re-word this into a more fluid
sentence?
> +Optional properties:
> + - interrupts : The second optional interrupt is the base of the interrupts
> + multiplexed by the lubbock motherboard. If unspecified, the
> + range is fully dynamic, and the irqdomain will generate its
> + interrupt base on the fly.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +mb: lubbock-mb at 0 {
> + compatible = "intel,lubbock-io";
> + interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING 400 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&pxairq>;
Whitespace error.
> +};
I'm guessing mb means motherboard? I think it's unusual for a
motherboard to have it's own driver. Usually we provide drivers for
the individual components/peripherals situated on the board.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: add lubbock-io binding
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 08:35:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150119083533.GF21886@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421406010-14851-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Add a binding for lubbock motherboard IO board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/lubbock-io.txt | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/lubbock-io.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/lubbock-io.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/lubbock-io.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..33c9e21
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/lubbock-io.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +Intel's pxa255 system development platform motherboard.
s/pxa25/PXA25/
"system development platform motherboard" doesn't quite sit right with me.
How about "Intel Xscale PXA255 development platform (Lubbock)"?
> +This is the motherboard, or IO board, of the pxa25x development system,
> +supporting a lubbock pxa25x SoC board.
Again, this sounds weird.
> +Required properties:
> + - compatible : One of the following chip-specific strings:
> + "intel,lubbock-io"
An odd thing to say with only one entry.
Also, please line it up to the right of the ':' above.
> + - interrupts : The first interrupt is the line the /IRQ signal the IO board
> + multiplex is connected to. The only known case is GPIO0 on the
> + pxa25x SoC.
Can you get someone to help you re-word this into a more fluid
sentence?
> +Optional properties:
> + - interrupts : The second optional interrupt is the base of the interrupts
> + multiplexed by the lubbock motherboard. If unspecified, the
> + range is fully dynamic, and the irqdomain will generate its
> + interrupt base on the fly.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +mb: lubbock-mb@0 {
> + compatible = "intel,lubbock-io";
> + interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING 400 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&pxairq>;
Whitespace error.
> +};
I'm guessing mb means motherboard? I think it's unusual for a
motherboard to have it's own driver. Usually we provide drivers for
the individual components/peripherals situated on the board.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-19 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-16 11:00 [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: add lubbock-io binding Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-16 11:00 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-16 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mfd: lubbock_io: add lubbock_io board Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-16 11:00 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-19 9:17 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-19 9:17 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-19 9:17 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-19 19:09 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-19 19:09 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-19 19:09 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-20 10:29 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-20 10:29 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-20 10:29 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-20 11:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-20 11:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21 7:46 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-21 7:46 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-21 7:46 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-21 8:16 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-21 8:16 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-21 8:27 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-21 8:27 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-21 8:27 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-21 12:35 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-21 12:35 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-21 12:35 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-21 13:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21 13:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21 13:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21 13:36 ` robert.jarzmik at free.fr
2015-01-21 13:36 ` robert.jarzmik
2015-01-21 13:36 ` robert.jarzmik-GANU6spQydw
2015-01-21 15:10 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-21 15:10 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-21 19:22 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-21 19:22 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-21 19:22 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-21 9:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21 9:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21 9:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21 9:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21 9:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21 16:05 ` unclear ipv6 redirect message (was Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mfd: lubbock_io: add lubbock_io board) Joe Perches
2015-01-21 16:05 ` Joe Perches
2015-01-21 16:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21 16:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21 16:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21 16:40 ` Joe Perches
2015-01-21 16:40 ` Joe Perches
2015-01-21 16:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-21 16:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: pxa: lubbock: use new lubbock_io driver Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-16 11:00 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-19 8:35 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2015-01-19 8:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: add lubbock-io binding Lee Jones
2015-01-19 19:29 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-19 19:29 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-19 19:29 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-20 10:18 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-20 10:18 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150119083533.GF21886@x1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.