All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm: omap: hwmod: add debugfs interface
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:11:44 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150120151144.GD6556@saruman> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150120143603.GB6556@saruman>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1466 bytes --]

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:36:03AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:13:57AM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > 
> > > > By exposing the details of hwmod structures
> > > > to debugfs we can much more easily verify
> > > > that changes to hwmod data is correct and won't
> > > > cause regressions.
> > > > 
> > > > The idea is that this can be used to check the
> > > > state of one hwmod, verify hwmod sysc fields, etc.
> > > > 
> > > > For example, this will be used to move some of
> > > > the sysc fields to DT and later verify that they
> > > > are correct pre- and post-patch.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> > > 
> > > This one had a bunch of unnecessary includes and checkpatch issues 
> > > (below).  I cleaned those up here and have queued the result (also below) 
> > > for v3.20.
> > 
> > ... and, the patch doesn't even boot.  Dropped.
> > 
> > If you really want something like this to be merged, resend a version that 
> > boots, and has checkpatch warnings fixed and unnecessary includes dropped.  
> > Otherwise you're just wasting my time.
> 
> you're using a really old version, though. There have been other
> versions which are still under discussion.

not to mention that this was an RFC, not meant for merging at the time
it was sent.

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC/PATCH] arm: omap: hwmod: add debugfs interface
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:11:44 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150120151144.GD6556@saruman> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150120143603.GB6556@saruman>

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:36:03AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:13:57AM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > 
> > > > By exposing the details of hwmod structures
> > > > to debugfs we can much more easily verify
> > > > that changes to hwmod data is correct and won't
> > > > cause regressions.
> > > > 
> > > > The idea is that this can be used to check the
> > > > state of one hwmod, verify hwmod sysc fields, etc.
> > > > 
> > > > For example, this will be used to move some of
> > > > the sysc fields to DT and later verify that they
> > > > are correct pre- and post-patch.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> > > 
> > > This one had a bunch of unnecessary includes and checkpatch issues 
> > > (below).  I cleaned those up here and have queued the result (also below) 
> > > for v3.20.
> > 
> > ... and, the patch doesn't even boot.  Dropped.
> > 
> > If you really want something like this to be merged, resend a version that 
> > boots, and has checkpatch warnings fixed and unnecessary includes dropped.  
> > Otherwise you're just wasting my time.
> 
> you're using a really old version, though. There have been other
> versions which are still under discussion.

not to mention that this was an RFC, not meant for merging at the time
it was sent.

-- 
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150120/d50f40c9/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-20 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-05 22:31 [RFC/PATCH] arm: omap: hwmod: add debugfs interface Felipe Balbi
2014-12-05 22:31 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-20  5:18 ` Paul Walmsley
2015-01-20  5:18   ` Paul Walmsley
2015-01-20  8:13   ` Paul Walmsley
2015-01-20  8:13     ` Paul Walmsley
2015-01-20 14:36     ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-20 14:36       ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-20 15:11       ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2015-01-20 15:11         ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150120151144.GD6556@saruman \
    --to=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.